It is shown that the 36 country real effective exchange rate (REER) of India, which is I(1), becomes stationary once a single exogenous shock (corresponding to the implementation of the liberalization policy by the government of India) is separated from its stochastic component and modelled as a break in the deterministic trend. The implication of this for the export supply function is enormous. While without the break real export has a long-run relationship with REER and gross domestic product, with the break the relationship no more exists.
AltinayG. (2005). Structural breaks in long-term Turkish macroeconomic data, 1923–2003. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 5(4), 117–130.
2.
Bahmani-OskooeeMohsenKaraOrhan. (2003). Relative responsiveness of trade flows to a change in prices and exchange rate. International Review of Applied Economics, 17(3), 293–308.
3.
BhattacharyyaR.MukherjeeJ. (2014). Structural breaks and the effect of exchange rate on India’s exports. InCurrent issues in international trade: Methodologies and development implications for the world economy. New York, USA: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
4.
BecF.BassilC., 2009. Federal funds rate stationarity: New evidence. Economics Bulletin, 29(2), 867–872.
5.
DickeyD. A.FullerW. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431.
6.
GhoshJ. (1990). Exchange rates and trade balance some aspects of recent Indian experience. Economic and Political Weekly, 25(8) March, 441–445.
7.
GopinathG.ItskhokiO.RigobonR. (2010). Currency choice and exchange rate pass-through. American Economic Review, 100(1), 304–336.
8.
JoshiV.LittleI. M. D. (1994). India: Macroeconomics and political economy, 1964–1991. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
9.
KapetaniosG. (2005). Unit-root testing against the alternative hypothesis of up to m structural breaks. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 26(1), 123–133.
10.
KimD.PerronP. (2009). Unit root tests allowing for a break in the trend function at an unknown time under both the null and alternative hypotheses. Journal of Econometrics, 148(1), 1–13.
11.
KohliR. (2002). Real exchange rate stationarity in managed floats. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(5), 2February, 475–482.
12.
LeeJ.StrazicichM. (2003). Minimum LM unit root test with two structural breaks. Reviewof Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1082–1089.
13.
LeeJ.StrazicichM. (2004). Minimum LM unit root test with one structural break. Working Papers 04–17, Boone, NC: Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.
14.
LumsdaineR.PapellD. (1997). Multiple trends breaks and the unit root hypothesis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(2), 212–218.
15.
NayyarD. (1988). India’s export performance: Underlying factors and constraints. In LucasR. E. B.PapanekG. F. (Eds), The Indian economy: Recent development and future prospects. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
16.
NelsonC. R.PlosserC. I. (1982). Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series. Journal of Monetary Economics, 10, 139–162.
17.
NunesL.NewboldP.KuanC. M. (1997). Testing for unit roots with breaks: Evidence on the great crash and the unit root hypothesis reconsidered. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 59(4), 435–448.
18.
PerronP. (1989). The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica, 57(6), 1361–1401.
19.
PesaranM. H.ShinY. (1999). An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. In StromS. (ed.), Econometrics and economic theory in the 20th century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium (Chapter 11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Reserve Bank of India (RBI). (2005). Reserve Bank of India Bulletin, December.
21.
SarkarP. (1994). India’s balance of payment and exchange rate behaviour since 1971: A new approach. Economic and Political Weekly, 29(35), 43–48.
22.
Sinha RoyS. (2001). Post-reforms exports growth in India: An exploratory analysis. RIS Discussion Paper # 13, Research and Information System for the Non-aligned and Other Developing Countries, New Delhi.
23.
SrinivasanT. N. (1998). India’s export performance: A comparative analysis. In AhluwaliaI. J.LittleI. M. D. (Eds), India’s economic reforms and development: Essays for Manmohan Singh. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
24.
VeeramaniC. (2007). Sources of India’s export growth in pre and post reform periods. Economic and Political Weekly, 23June, 2419–2427.
25.
VeeramaniC. (2008). Impact of exchange rate appreciation on India’s exports. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(22), 10–15.
26.
WilsonP.TatK. C. (2001). Exchange rates and the trade balance: The case of Singapore 1970 to 1996. Journal of Asian Economics, 12(1), 47–63.
27.
ZivotE.AndrewsD. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251–270.
