The article explores the role of the political regime on asset returns in an International Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) framework based on a sample of 17 emerging countries. The results reveal that the political regime has substantial impact on average stock returns. Firms in autocratic regimes have higher average returns that exceed the required returns. This is consistent with the fact that autocratic institutions have compensations for greater chances of bankruptcy, political instability and nationalization of assets. Results are robust to an alternative model to the standard CAPM risk model as well as to an unbalanced sample of countries.
AcemogluD.JohnsonS.RobinsonJ. (2001). Colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369–1401.
2.
AcemogluD.JohnsonS.RobinsonJ. (2002). Reversal of fortune: Geography and institutions in the making of the modern world income distribution. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(4), 1231–1294.
3.
AdlerM.DumasB. (1983), International portfolio choice and corporation finance: A synthesis. Journal of Finance, 38, 925–984.
4.
BarroRobert. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407–443.
5.
BlackFischerJensenMichael C.ScholesMyron. (1972). The capital asset pricing model: Some empirical tests. In JensenM.C. (Ed.), Studies in the theory of capital markets (pp. 79–121). New York: Praeger.
6.
BeckT.LevineR.LoayzaN. (2000). Financial development and the sources of growth. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 261–300.
7.
BeckT.Demirguc-KuntA.LevineR. (2000). A new database on financial development and structure. World Bank Economic Review, 14(3), 597– 605.
8.
BeckT.Demirguc-KuntA.LevineR. (2003). Law, endowment and finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 70(2), 137–181.
9.
BeckT.A.LevineR. (2003). Legal institutions and financial development. In MenardClaudeShirleyMary M. (Eds), Handbook for new institutional economics. Norwell MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10.
BusseMathias. (2003). Democracy and FDI. Discussion Paper Series 26260, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.
11.
ChangJow-ranErrunzaVihangHoganKedHungMao-wei. (2005). An intertemporal international asset pricing model: Theory and empirical evidence. European Financial Management, 11(2), 173–194.
12.
ClagueC.KeeferC.P.KnackS.OlsonM. (1996). Property and contract rights under democracy and dictatorship. MPRA Paper 25720, University Library of Munich, Germany.
13.
ClarkEphraimTunaruRadu. (2003). Emerging markets: Stock market investing with political risk. EFMA 2001 Lugano Meetings: Middlesex University Business School Discussion Paper No. 6, Cass Business School Research Paper.
14.
De SantisG.GerardB. (1998). How big is the premium for currency risk?Journal of Financial Economics, 49(3), 375–412.
15.
DumasB.SolnikB. (1995). The world price of foreign exchange risk. Journal of Finance, 50(2), 445–479.
16.
FamaE.FrenchK. (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance47(2), 427–465.
17.
FamaE.FrenchK. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56.
18.
FamaE.MacBethJ. (1973). Risk, return and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 607–636.
19.
GiovanniniA.JorionP. (1989). The time-variation of risk and return in the foreign exchange and stock market. Journal of Finance, 44(2), 307–325.
20.
GuptaDipak K.MadhavanM.BleeA. (1998). Democracy, economic growth and political instability: An integrated perspective. Journal of Socio-Economics, 27(5), 588–611.
21.
HarveyC.R. (1995). Predictable risk and returns in emerging markets. Review of Financial Studies, 8(3), 773–816.
22.
HuangYongfu. (2005). Will political liberalisation bring about financial development?Working Paper. University of Bristol.
JorionP. (1991). The pricing of exchange rate risk in the stock market. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 26(3), 361–376.
25.
KnackStephenKeeferPhilip. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: Cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics and Politics, 7(3), 207–227.
26.
KorajczykRobertVialletClaude. (1989). An empirical investigation of international asset pricing. Review of Financial Studies, 2(4), 553–585.
27.
La PortaR.Lopez-de-SilanesF.ShleiferA.VishnyR.W. (1997). Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance, 52(3), 1131–1150.
28.
La PortaR.Lopez-de-SilanesF.ShleiferA.VishnyR.W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155.
29.
MinierJ.A. (1998). Democracy and growth: Alternative approaches. Journal of Economic Growth, 3(3), 241–266.
30.
NilssonBirger. (2002). International asset pricing and the benefits and the benefits from world market diversification. Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, Lund University.
31.
North Douglas C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, 5(1), 97–112.
32.
NorthDouglasWeingastBarry. (1989). Constitutions and commitment: The evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth century England. Journal of Economic History, 49(4), 803–832.
33.
PerssonTorsten. (2005). Forms of democracy, policy and economic development. NBER Working Paper 11171.
34.
PoirsonH. (1998). Essais en Economie de la Croissance and du Développement. Thèse de Doctorat, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales.
35.
RajanR.G.ZingalesL. (2003). The great reversals: The politics of financial development in the twentieth century. Journal of Financial Economies, 69(1), 5–50.
36.
RobbockStefan H.SimondsK. (1973). International business and multinational enterprise. Homewood: R. Irwin.
37.
RodrikD. (1996). Labor standards in international trade: Do they matter and what do we do about them? In LawrenceRobertRodrikDaniWalleyJohn (Eds), Emerging agenda for global trade: High states for developing countries. Washington DC: Overseas Development Council.
38.
TavaresJ.WacziargR. (2001). How democracy affects growth. European Economic Review, 45(8), 1341–1378.
