The monetary policy (MP) targets the short end of the yield curve (YC) although real economic activity is dependent upon the medium to long-term market interest rates. Conventional wisdom is that decrease in the MP target rate leads to an immediate decrease in market interest rates, and an increase in bond prices; yet evidence for this view is elusive. Therefore, the question of how does the MP translate across the YC remains at the forefront of many recent policy debates. Bringing the foundations of expectation hypothesis and empirical analysis of Sri Lanka market interest rates for the period 2000–2009 explains that MP impact monotonically decreases over the YC at the short end and become segmented towards long term of the YC. The impact appears to be weaker and increasingly segmented at times of financial and economic uncertainties. This invites policy attention on the part of MP effectiveness, structural impediments and market confidence in Sri Lanka.
BalduzziP.BertolaF.ForesiS.KlapperL. (1998). Interest rate targeting and the dynamics of short term rates. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 30, 26–50.
2.
BatesS.VaugirardV. (2009). Monetary transmission channels around the subprime crisis: The US experience. Global Economy & Finance Journal, 2(2) (September), 138–156.
3.
BernankeB.BlinderA. (1992). The federal funds rate and channels of monetary transmission. American Economic Review, 82(4), 901–921.
4.
BindseilU. (2004). Monetary policy implementation: Theory, past and present. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB), Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). (September2009). Minutes.
6.
ButtiglioneL.GiovaneDel Q.TristaniO. (1998). In AngeloniI.RovelliR. (Eds), Monetary policy actions and the term structure of interest rates: A cross-country analysis. Macmillan Press.
7.
CampbellJ.Y.ShillerR.J. (1991). Yield spreads and interest rate movements: A bird’s eye view. Review of Economic Studies, 58(3) (May), 495–514.
8.
CalomirisC. (2008). The subprime crisis: What’s old, what’s new, and what’s next?Federal reserve of Kansas City colloquium on “Maintaining financial stability in a changing financial system”. Wyoming: Jackson Hole, 21–22August.
9.
Central Bank of Sri Lanka. (a). Annual Report. Various Issues. Colombo: CBSL Press.
10.
Central Bank of Sri Lanka. (b). Review of external sector developments. Various Press Releases. Colombo.
11.
CochraneD.OrcuttG.H. (1949). Application of least squares regression to error terms. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44, 32–61.
12.
CookT.HahnT. (1989). The effect of changes in the federal funds rate target on market interest rates in the 1970s. Journal of Monetary Economics, 24, 331–351.
13.
CooperG. (2008). The origin of financial crises. New York: Vintage Books.
14.
CoxJ.C.IngersolJ.E.RossS.A. (1985). A theory of the term structure of interest rates. Econometrica, 53(2) (March), 385–407.
15.
DrakosK. (2001). Monetary policy and the yield curve in an emerging market: The Greek case. Emerging Markets Review, 2, 244–262.
16.
DrakosK. (2002). A daily view of the term structure dynamics: Some international evidence. De Economist, 150(1), 41–52.
17.
DurbinJ. (1970). Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression when some of the regressors are lagged dependent variables. Econometrica, 38, 420–421.
18.
EstrellaA.MishkinF. (1996). The yield curve as a predictor of U.S. recessions. Current Issues in Economic and Finance, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 2(7).
19.
Federal Reserve Board of Governors. (2008). Minutes. Federal Open Market Committee, October.
20.
Federal Reserve Board of Governors. (2009). Minutes. Federal Open Market Committee, September.
21.
HaldaneA.ReadV. (2000). Monetary policy surprises and yield curve. Bank of England Working Paper 106.
22.
International Monetary Fund. (2009). World Economic Outlook, April. Retrieved from www.imf.org
23.
JohansenS. (1992). Testing weak exogeneity and the order of co-integration in UK money demand data. Journal of Policy Modelling, 14, 313–334.
24.
KuttnerK. (2001). Monetary policy surprises and interest rates: Evidence from the fed funds futures market. Journal of Monetary Economics, 47, 523–544.
25.
MishkinF.S. (1990). The information in longer maturity term structure about future inflation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, 815–828.
26.
MishkinF.S. (2009). Is monetary policy effective during financial crises?National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper (14678).
27.
ObstfeldM. (2009). Lenders of last resort in a globalized world. International Conference, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan, Tokyo, 27–28 May.
28.
OdaN.UedaK. (2005). The effects of bank of Japan’s zero interest rate commitment and quantitative monetary easing on the yield curve: A macro finance-approach. Bank of Japan Working Paper Series, 05-E-6.
29.
PraisS.J.WinstenC.B. (1954). Trend estimators and serial correlation. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 383.
30.
RudebuschG. (1995). Federal reserve interest rate targeting, rational expectations and the term structure. Journal of Monetary Economics, 35, 245–274.
31.
ShillerR.J. (2008). The subprime solution. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
32.
SmetsF.TsatsaronisK. (1997). Why does the yield curve predict economic activity? Dissecting the evidence for Germany and the United States. Bank for International Settlements Working Paper 49.
33.
ThorntonD.L. (2000). Lifting the veil of secrecy from monetary policy: Evidence from the Fed’s early discount rate policy. Journal Money Credit Banking, 32(2), 155–167.
34.
ThorntonD.L. (2004). Testing the expectation hypothesis: Some new evidence for Japan. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 86(5), 21–39.
35.
WalshE.C. (2010). Monetary theory and policy, second edition. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT Press.
