This article analyzes the evolving trends in tenancy contracts in India. Using official statistical data, the study observes a U-shaped pattern in the proportion of land leased and the share of cultivators engaged in tenancy over time. This declined until 1991–1992 and was followed by a considerable increase since 2002–2003. Notably, in the 1970s, semi-medium cultivators were the predominant tenant class. However, in the revival phase, landless and near-landless households emerged as the principal demanders for land under the tenancy. The article argues that in the 1970s, the green revolution and the changes in public policy related to agriculture caused an increase in productivity and profitability and the introduction of markets for many factors and output which were previously nontraded, all of which induced a decline in the extent of tenancy. In the subsequent phase, as the impact of new technology tapered out and state support declined, the rising cost of cultivation and reduced returns created disincentives for landowners to cultivate, giving rise to absenteeism and an employment and livelihood crisis and leading to the revival of tenancy and the emergence of labor-supplying households as the primary tenant group.
AbrahamV. (2017). Stagnant employment growth: Last three years may have been the worst. Economic & Political Weekly, 52(38), 13–17.
2.
AbrahamV. (2024). Ruptured rural transformation from non-farm to mixed households in rural India. Economic & Political Weekly, 59(50), 84–93.
3.
BalajiA. M., & VijayR. (2024). Diminution and feminisation of informal manufacturing Enterprises. Economic & Political Weekly, 59(22), 28–31.
4.
BalakrishnanP. (2000). Agriculture and economic reforms: Growth and welfare. Economic & Political Weekly, 35(12), 999–1005.
5.
BandyopadhyayR. (1993). Land system in India: A historical review. Economic & Political Weekly, 28(52), A149–A155.
6.
BanerjeeA., & IyerL. (2005). History, institutions, and economic performance: The legacy of colonial land tenure systems in India. American Economic Review, 95(4), 1190–1213.
7.
BansalG. (2020). Tenancy and accumulation: A study of capitalist farm sector in Punjab. Review of Agrarian Studies, 10(2), 28–47.
8.
BansalV., UsamiY., & RawalV. (2018). Agricultural tenancy in contemporary India. SSER Monograph 18/1, Society for Social and Economic Research, New Delhi.
9.
BardhanP. K. (1979). Agricultural development and land tenancy in a peasant economy: A theoretical and empirical analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(1), 48–57.
10.
BardhanP. K., SrinivasanT. (1971). Cropsharing tenancy in agriculture: A theoretical and empirical analysis. American Economic Review, 61(1), 48–64.
11.
BasoleA., & BasuD. (2011). Relations of production and modes of surplus extraction in India: Part 1, Agriculture. Economic & Political Weekly, 46(14), 41–58.
12.
BhaduriA. (1983). The economic structure of backward agriculture. Academic Press.
13.
Bhagat-GangulyV. (Ed.). (2016). Land rights in India: Policies, movements and challenges. Routledge.
14.
BhallaG. S., & SinghG. (2001). Indian agriculture: Four decades of development. Sage Publications.
15.
BhattacharjeeM. R. (2020). Development and internal outmigration in India in post-economic reform era. Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 4, 713–735.
16.
BhattacharyaR. (2015). A review of employment scenario in India in the post-liberalization Era. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(2), 27–48.
17.
BhattacharyaS. (2022). Agricultural tenancy in contemporary rural India [PhD thesis, School of Development Studies, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai].
18.
ByresT. J. (Ed.) (1983). Sharecropping and sharecropper. Frank Cass.
19.
ChakravartiA. (2001). Caste and agrarian class: A view from Bihar. Economic & Political Weekly, 36(17), 1449–1462.
20.
ChandR., & ParappurathuS. (2012). >Temporal and spatial variations in agricultural growth and its determinants, 47(26–27), 55–65.
21.
ChavanP., & SivamuruganT. (2017). Formal credit and small farmers in India. In SwaminathanM. & BaskiS. (Eds.), How do small farmers fare? Evidence from village studies in India (pp. 230–272). Tulika Books.
22.
DasA., & UsmaiY. (2018). Wage rates in rural India, 1998–99 to 2016–17. Review of Agrarian Studies, 7(2), 4–38.
23.
DasA., DharN. S., MunjalK., & SwaminathanM. (2024). Patterns of income growth in an eastern Uttar Pradesh village, 2006–2023. Economic & Political Weekly, 59(43), 54–62.
24.
DebU., PramanikS., KhanP. E., & BantilanC. (2016). Tenancy and agricultural productivity in southern India: Nature, extent, trends and determinants. Journal of Rural Development, 35(3), 435–464.
25.
DharN. S., & PatraS. (2017). Labour in small farm: Evidence from village studies. In BaksiS., & SwaminathanM. (Eds.), How do small farmers fare? (pp. 62–95). Tulika Publications.
26.
EllisF. (1998). Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification. The Journal of Development Studies, 35(1), 1–38.
27.
EvensonR. E., & GollinD. (2003). Assessing the impact of the green revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science, 300(5620), 758–762.
28.
Government of India (GoI). (2017). Report of committee on state agrarian relations and the unfinished task in land reforms. Department of Land Resources, Ministry of Rural Development.
29.
KayatekinS. A. (1996). Sharecropping and class: A preliminary analysis. Rethinking Marxism, 9(1), 28–57.
30.
KerswellT., & PratapS. (2019). Liberalisation in India: Does it resolve or aggravate employment problems?Journal of Contemporary Asia, 49(4), 626–649.
31.
KooperA. (1983). Sharecroppers and landlords in Bengal, 1930–50: The dependency web and its implications. In ByresT. J. (Ed.), Sharecropping and sharecropper (pp. 232–261). Frank Cass.
32.
KotwalA., RamaswamiB., & WadhawaW. (2011). Economic liberalization and Indian economic growth: What’s the evidence?Journal of Economic Literature, 49(4), 1152–1199.
33.
KumarN., & PandeyM. (2021). Labor process in rural Bihar: A set of survival strategies. International Journal of Financial Management and Economics, 4(2), 118–128.
34.
KumarS. (2022). New farm bills and farmers’ resistance to neoliberalism. Sociological Bulletin, 71(4), 483–494.
35.
KunduA., & GoswamiP. (2022). Causes behind tenancy contract among the marginal farmers of West Bengal, India and its impact on their livelihood. Artha Vijnana, 64(1), 1–19.
36.
LercheJ. (2015). Regional patterns of agrarian accumulation in India. In Harriss-WhiteB. & HeyerJ. (Eds.), Indian capitalism in development (pp. 46–65). Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
37.
Maria-CaballeroJ. (1983). Sharecropping as an efficient system: Further answers to an old puzzle. In ByresT. J. (Ed.), Sharecropping and sharecropper (pp. 107–119). Frank Cass.
38.
MuraliD., & VijayR. (2017). Revival of agricultural sector and increasing tenancy in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 52(31), 18–23.
39.
NadkarniM. V. (1976). Tenants from dominant class: A developing contradiction in land reform. Economic & Political Weekly, 11(52), A137–A146.
40.
NadkarniM. V. (2002). Land reforms: A bus that India missed which may never come again. Indian Journal of Agriculture Economics, 57(4), 751–761.
41.
NayyarD. (2017). Economic liberalisation in India: Then and now. Economic & Political Weekly, 52(2), 41–48. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44166888
42.
NSSO. (1958). First report on land holdings, rural sector, 1955. Government of India.
43.
NSSO. (2006). Household ownership holdings in India, 2003. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India.
44.
NSSO. (2015). Household ownership and operation holding in India, 2013. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India.
45.
NSSO. (2016). Income, expenditure, productive assets and indebtedness of agricultural households in India, 2013. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India.
46.
NSSO. (2021). Situation assessment of agricultural households and land livestock holdings in rural India, 2019. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India.
47.
PandeyM., & VijayR. (2024). Analysing livelihood strategies of landless manual labour households in rural Bihar: A study of a North Bihar village. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 67, 443–463.
48.
PantC. (1980). Exploitation and interrelated tenancy and credit transactions. Indian Economic Review, 15(4), 243–253.
49.
PantC. (1983). Tenancy and family resources. Journal of Development Economics, 12(1983), 27–39.
50.
ParthasarathyG., & PothanaV. (1983). Capitalism in agriculture and peasant farming: Case of Godavari delta. Economic & Political Weekly, 18(39), A93–A97.
51.
PatnaikU. (1998). Tenancy and accumulation. In BasuK. (Ed.), Agrarian questions (pp. 155–201). Oxford University Press.
52.
PatnaikU. (2010). On some fatal fallacies. Economic & Political Weekly, 53(42), 81–89.
53.
PursellG., & GulatiA. (1993). Liberalizing Indian agriculture: An agenda for reform [World Bank Working Paper, No. 1172, Policy Research Department]. The World Bank.
54.
RaiP. C. (2019). Significance of rural-urban migration in India post-liberalization. Indian Journal of Economics and Development, 7(6), 1–6.
55.
RamachandranV. K. (2011). The state of agrarian relation in India today. The Marxist, 27(1), 51–89.
56.
RamachandranV. K., & RawalV. (2009). The impact of liberalization and globalization. Global Labor Journal, 1(1), 56–91.
57.
RamachandranV., RawalV., & SwaminathanM. (2010). Socio-economic surveys of three villages in Andhra Pradesh. Tulika Books.
58.
RamakumarR. (2012). Continuity and change in “New India.” In D’CostaA. P. (Ed.), A new India? Critical reflection in long twentieth century (pp. 42–70). Anthem Publication.
59.
RamakumarR. (2022). Distress in field: Indian agriculture after economic liberalisation. Tulika Books.
60.
RaoJ. M. (1996). Agriculture development under state planning. In ByresT. J. (Ed.), The state, development planning and liberalisation in India (pp. 127–171). Oxford University Press.
61.
ReddyD. N., ReddyA. A., & BantilanM. C. S. (2014). The impact of Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) on rural labor markets and agriculture. India Review, 13(3), 251–273.
62.
ShahG., & SahD. C. (2002). Land reform in India: Performance and challenges in Gujarat and Maharashtra. Sage Publishers.
63.
SinghI. (1989). Reverse tenancy in Punjab agriculture: Impact of technological change. Economic & Political Weekly, 24(25), A86–A92.
64.
SinghS. (2000). Crisis in Punjab agriculture. Economic & Political Weekly, 35(23), 1889–1892.
65.
SkoufiasE. (1995). Household resources, transaction costs, and adjustment through land tenancy. Land Economics, 71(1), 42–56.
66.
StiglitzJ. E. (1986). The new development economics. World Development, 14(2), 257–265.
67.
SwaminathanM., & BaksiS. (Eds.). (2017). How do small farmers fare? Evidence from village studies in India. Tulika Books.
68.
ThornerA. (1982). Semi-feudalism or capitalism? Contemporary debate on classes and modes of production in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 17(49), 1961–1968.
69.
ThornerD., & ThornerA. (1962). Land and labor in India. Asia Publication House.
70.
UpadhyaC. B. (1988). The farmer-capitalists of coastal Andhra Pradesh. Economic & Political Weekly, 23(28), 1433–1442.
71.
VarmaB. N., & SharmaR. (1984). Tenancy in backward agrarian setting: A case study of North Bihar. Social Scientist, 12(8), 46–54.
72.
VijayR. (2012). Structural retrogression and rise of “new landlords” in Indian agriculture: An empirical exercise. Economic & Political Weekly, 47(5), 37–45.
73.
VyasV. S. (1970). Tenancy in dynamic setting. Economic & Political Weekly, 5(26), A73–A80.
74.
World Bank. (1991). India: 1991 country economic memorandum (vol. 1). Country Operation Division, Indian Country Division, India Country Department, Asia Region.
75.
World Bank. (2024). Absentee landlords and land tenancy [Policy Research Working Paper, No. 10865, World Bank Group]. South Asia Region, Office of the Chief Economist.
