The land reform programme of the South African government aims, among other things, at generating large-scale employment, increasing rural incomes and combatting poverty. However, the programme equally enforces an agribusiness model that promotes large-scale production through failure to subdivide the large farms, and encouraging the beneficiaries to use the land in the manner that the former white landowners did. The article demonstrates the unsuitability of large-scale production for the land reform beneficiaries, given its unsustainable production costs. On the contrary, the limited costs associated with the small-scale model allow the beneficiaries, including those relying on off-farm income, to produce with better effect.
African National Congress (ANC) (1994). Reconstruction and development programme. Johannesburg: Umanyano Publications.
2.
AliberM., & CousinsB. (2013). Livelihoods after land reform in South Africa. Journal of Agrarian Change, 13(1), 140–165.
3.
AnseeuwW., & MathebulaN. (2008). Evaluating land reform’s contribution to South Africa’s pro-poor growth pattern. Paper presented at the TIPS Annual Forum. Retrieved from http://www.tips.org.za/publication/evaluating-land-reforms-contribution-south-africas-pro-poor-growth-pattern
4.
ArrighiG. (1970). Labour supplies in historical perspective: A study of the proletarianization of the African peasantry in Rhodesia. Journal of Development Studies, 6(3), 197–234.
5.
AtkinsonD. (2007). Going for broke: The fate of farm workers in arid South Africa. Cape Town: HSRC Press.
6.
BernsteinH. (2007). Agrarian questions of capital and labour: Some theory about land reform (and a periodisation). In NtsebezaL. & HallR. (Eds.), The land question in South Africa: The challenge of transformation and redistribution (pp. 27–59). Cape Town: HSRC.
7.
BundyC. (1979). The rise and fall of the South African peasantry. Cape Town: David Phillip.
8.
ConnellR. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
9.
CousinsB. (2013). Smallholder irrigation schemes, agrarian reform and accumulation from above and from below in South Africa. Journal of Agrarian Change, 13(1), 116–139.
10.
CousinsB. (2015). Through a glass darkly: Towards agrarian reform in South Africa. In CousinsB. & WalkerC. (Eds.), Land divided, land restored: Land reform in South Africa for the 21st century (pp. 250–269). Johannesburg: Jacana.
11.
Department of Land Affairs (DLA) (1997). White paper on South African land policy. Pretoria: Government Printers.
12.
Department of Rural Development and Land, Reform (DRDLR) (2013). Policy for the recapitalisation and development programme of the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform. Pretoria: Government Printers.
13.
De SchutterO. (2011). How not to think of land-grabbing: Three critiques of large-scale investments in farmland. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(2), 249–279.
14.
GriffinK., KhanA. R., & IckowitzA. (2004). In defence of neo-classical neo-populism. Journal of Agrarian Change, 4(3), 361–386.
15.
HallR. (2004). A political economy of land reform in South Africa. Review of African Political Economy, 31(100), 213–227.
16.
HallR. (2009). Dynamics in the commercial farming sector. In HallR. (Ed.), Another countryside? Policy options for land and agrarian reform in South Africa (pp. 121–131). Bellville: PLAAS.
17.
HallR., & KepeT. (2017). Elite capture and state neglect: New evidence on South Africa’s land reform. Review of African Political Economy, 44(151), 122–130.
18.
KepeT., & HallR. (2018). Land redistribution in South Africa: Towards decolonisation or recolonisation?Politikon, 45(1), 128–137.
19.
MabandlaN. (2015). Rethinking Bundy: Land and the black middle class-accumulation beyond the peasantry. Development Southern Africa, 32(1), 76–89.
20.
MafejeA. (2003). The agrarian question, access to land, and peasant responses in Sub-Saharan Africa. Geneva: UNRISD.
21.
McMichaelP. (2011). The food regime in the land grab: Articulating ‘global ecology’ and political economy. Paper presented at the International Conference on Global Land Grabbing, Land Deal Politics Initiative, University of Sussex, Brighton.
22.
Movement of Rural Landless Workers (2013). Agrarian program of the MST: Struggle, build people’s agrarian reform. Paper prepared for presentation at the Sixth National MST Congress, Brasilia.
23.
NcapayiF. (2013). Land and changing social relations in South Africa’s former reserves: The case of Luphaphasi in Sakhisizwe Local Municipality, Eastern Cape (PhD thesis). University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
24.
Republic of South Africa (RSA) (1996). Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gov.za/legislation/constitution/SAConstitution-web-eng.pdf
25.
RusengaC. (2017). The socio-economic consequences of the agribusiness model on the land reform beneficiaries in the Greater Tzaneen Municipality, South Africa: The case of the Elangeni project (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
26.
ScoonesI., MarongweN., MavedzengeB., MurimbarimbaF., MaheneheneJ., & SukumeC. (2011). Zimbabwe’s land reform: Challenging the myths. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(5), 967–993.
27.
SenderJ. (2016). Backward capitalism in rural South Africa: Prospects for accelerating accumulation in the Eastern Cape. Journal of Agrarian Change, 16(1), 3–31.
28.
Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) (2009). Census of commercial agricultural 2007: Preliminary. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.
29.
United Nations (2008). Best practices for organic policy: What developing country governments can do to promote the organic agriculture sector. Paper prepared for the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development hosted by the United Nations Environment Programme, New York.
30.
WilsonF. (1975). Farming, 1866–1966. In WilsonM. & ThompsonL. (Eds.), The Oxford history of South Africa: South Africa 1870–1966 (Vol. 2, pp. 104–171). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
