Upon being sworn in as the 56th Ecuadorian President on 15 January 2007, Rafael Correa immediately convened, through a referendum, a National Constituent Assembly to draw up a new constitution. One of the concerns of the assembly was to translate into law a food-sovereignty proposal put forward by social movements. In the process of becoming law, the food-sovereignty proposal was much changed. How is it possible that the final version, the law, so far fell short of the food-sovereignty movement’s original proposal? Addressing this question implies a reflection on the role of the state. We argue that (a) instead of strengthening the role of peasants, their participation was reduced to a bureaucratic structure (a ‘council’) that lacked the capacity to define or implement policies, and (b) the issue of the social function of land and land-reform was removed. I therefore conclude that the social movements’ proposal for food sovereignty was stripped of its essentials.
Acción Ecológica & Heifer (2009). Carta abierta sobre la Ley de Soberanía Alimentaria [Open Letter on the Law on Food Sovereignty]. Retrieved from www.ecoportal.net
2.
AustinJ. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
BorrasS. (2008). La Vía Campesina and its global campaign for Agrarian reform. Journal of Agrarian Change, 8(2–3), 258–289.
4.
BorrasS. (2010). The politics of transnational Agrarian movements. Development and Change, 41(5), 771–803.
5.
BorrasS., EdelmanM., & KayC. (2008). Transnational Agrarian movements: Origins and politics, campains and impact. Journal of Agrarian Change, 8(2), 169–204.
6.
BoserupE. (1965). The conditions of agricultural grow. New York, NY: Earthscan.
7.
CAFOLIS (2009). Trabajando por una propuesta de Ley de Soberanía Alimentaria [We are working for a Food Sovereignty Law]. Retrieved from cafolis.org
8.
CalderonG. (2008, June3). Hambrientos pero soberanos [We are hungry, but we are sovereign]. El Universo. Retrieved from https://www.eluniverso.com/2008/06/03/0001/21/03CFCE09355C409B8D4D2C6CCF892F09.html
9.
Colectivo Agrario (2009). Soberanía Alimentaria. Porque creemos en el debate: propuestas de legislación [Because we believe in the debate. Proposals to legislate]. Quito: Colectivo Agrario.
10.
CONAIE (2007). Constitución del Estado Plurinacional de la República del Ecuador. Propuesta de la Confederación de Nacionalidades Indígenas del Ecuador [Constitution of the Plurinational State of the Republic of Ecuador. Proposal of the Confederation of Indigenous Nationalities of Ecuador] . Quito: Confederación de Nacionalidades Indígenas del Ecuador.
11.
CorderoL. (1989 [1982]). Diccionario Quichua Castellano y Castellano Quichua [Quichua Castellano and Castellano Quichua Dictionary]. Quito: Corporación Editora Nacional.
12.
DasV., & PooleD. (2004). State and its margins: Comparative ethnographies. In DasV. & PooleD. (Eds.), Anthropology in the margins of the state (pp. 3–33). Santa Fe: SAR Press.
13.
Della PortaD., AndrettaM., MoscaL., & ReiterH. (2006). Globalization from below: Transnational activists and protest networks. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minessota Press.
14.
DesmaraisA. (2002). The via Campesina: Consolidating an international peasant and farm movement. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 29(2), 91–124.
15.
Ecuador (1998). Constitución 1998. Political Database of Americas. Retrieved from pdba.georgetown.edu
16.
Ecuador (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador [Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador]. Quito Publicacion Oficial de la Asamblea Nacional Constituyente (Official publication of the National Constituent Assembly).
17.
Ecuador (2009). Ley Orgánica de Regimén de Soberanía Alimentaria. Registro Oficial 583. Quito: 5 Mayo.
18.
ECUARUNARI (2008). Proyecto de Ley de Soberanía Alimentaria para el Buen Vivir. Unpublished Quito: Ecuarunari.
19.
El Comercio (2008). Soberanía Alimentaria ¿Qué significa? [Food Sovereignty What does it mean?] Retrieved from elcomercio.com
20.
El Universo (2008, June4). Politica. Asambleista cuestiona términos usados en la nueva Constitución [Assemblyman doubts the terms used in the constitution]. Retrieved eluniverso.com
21.
FENOCIN (2008). FENOCIN: Por un plan nacional agrario y la inter-culturalidad [Towards a national agrarian plan and interculturality]. Retrieved from uasb.edu.ec
22.
GuerreroA. (1991). La semantica de la dominación: el concertaje de indios [The semantic of domination: the indians concertaje]. Quito: Libri Mundi.
23.
GuptaA., & SharmaA. (2006). Globalization and poscolonial states. Current Anthropology, 47(2), 277–307.
24.
HernándezL., & DesmaraisA. (2009, October15). ‘Feeding the world and cooling the planet’: La Vía Campesina’s Fifth International Conference. Retrieved from viacampesina.org
25.
KeckM., & SikkinkK. (1998). Activist beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26.
La Hora (2006, December2). Jóvenes debaten sobre impactos del TLC [Young people discuss the impacts of the FTA]. Retrieved from lahora.com.ec
27.
La Via Campesina (2013). Paraguay: Declaración de Yvapuruvu, semillas en resistencia [Yvapuruvu Declaration. Seeds resisting dispossession]. Retrieved from viacampesina.org
28.
LatourB. (1994). On technical mediation. Philosophy, sociology, genealogy. InCommon knowledge (pp. 29–64). Retrieved from http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/54-TECHNIQUES-GB.pdf
29.
McKayB., RyanN., & Walsh-DilleyM. (2014). The ‘state’ of food sovereignty in Latin America: Political projects and alternative pathways in Venezuela, Ecuador, and Bolivia. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(6), 1175–1200. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.964217
30.
Nyeleni (2007). Nyeleni, synthesis report. Retrieved from nyeleni.org
31.
RichardsP. (1985). Indigenous agricultural revolution: Ecology and food production in West Africa. London, UK: Unwin Hyman.
32.
RoseN. (2006). Governing ‘advanced’ liberal democracies. In SharmaA. & GuptaA. E. (Eds.), The anthroplogy of the state (pp. 144–168). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
33.
RoseN., & MillerP. (2010). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. The British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 271–303.
34.
RoseroF. (2008). La Asamblea Nacional Constituyente: tensiones entre la utopía deseada y el cambio posible [The National Constituent Assembly: Tensions between the desired utopia and possible change]. Retrieved from institut-gouvernance.org
35.
RossetP. (2004). El Derecho a la Tierra. Cuatro textos sobre reforma agraria [The right to land. Four texts on agrarian reform]. Barcelona: Agora Nord-Sud.
36.
RossetP. (2006). Food is different: Why we must get the WTO out of agriculture. Bangalore: Natinal Printing Press.
37.
ScottJ. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT and London, UK: Yale University Press.
38.
SIPAE (2007). Hacia una agenda para las economías campesinas del Ecuador [Towards an agenda for the peasant economies of Ecuador]. Quito: SIPAE.
39.
SIPAE (2008). Propuesta Agraria del SIPAE para la nueva constitución [SIPAE, agrarian proposal for the new constitution]. Alerta Agraria, 9, 1–7.
40.
Van der PloegJ. D. (2003). The virtual farmer. Assen: Royal van Gorcum.
41.
WindfuhrM., & JonsenJ. (2005). UK food group. Retrieved from ukabc.org
42.
WiskerkeJ. S. C., & van der PloegJ. D. (2004). Seeds in transition: Essays on novelty production, niches and regimes in agriculture. Assen: Royal Van Gorcum.
