One of the most contentious policy issues in India is the demand for labour market flexibility. This paper empirically investigates two major reasons normally advanced in literature for explaining the phenomena of ‘jobless growth’ in the organized manufacturing sector and consequently introducing labour flexibility, namely (i) job security laws by strictly regulating hire and fire of workers makes labour adjustment process virtually impossible to undertake and (ii) rising real wages encourage adoption of capital intensive techniques in production – each impeding (not necessarily independently) employment growth. From our empirical analysis we find little evidence to support these claims. In fact, evidence suggests considerable flexibility in workforce adjustment already enjoyed by firms through growing use of contract workers. Employment stagnation is rather explained by the method employed by Annual Survey of Industries to estimate workers and the underlying nature of technological progress witnessed in the organized manufacturing sector during the study period.
AhluwaliaI. J. (1992). Productivity and growth in Indian manufacturing. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
2.
AnantT. C. A., MohapatraR., NagarajR., & SasikumarS. K. (2006). Labour markets in India: Issues and perspectives. In FelipeJ. & BasinstokeR. Hasan (Eds), Essays in industrial policy (pp. 148–165). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
3.
BesleyT., & BurgessR. (2004). Can labour regulation hinder economic performance? Evidence from India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 91–134.
4.
BhalotraS. (1998). The puzzle of jobless growth in Indian manufacturing. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 60(1), 5–32.
5.
DeshpandeL., SharmaA. N., KaranA., & SarkarS. (2004). Liberalization and labour: Labour market flexibility in Indian manufacturing. New Delhi: Institute for Human Development.
6.
FallonR. P., & LucasR. E. B. (1991). The impact of changes in job security regulations in India and Zimbabwe. The World Bank Economic Review, 5(3), 395–413.
7.
FallonR. P., & LucasR. E. B. (1993). Job security regulations and the dynamic demand for labor in India and Zimbabwe. Journal of Development Economics, 40(2), 241–275.
8.
GhoseK. A. (1994). Employment in organized manufacturing in India. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 37(2), 143–162.
9.
GhoseK. A. (2005). High wage-low productivity organized manufacturing and the employment challenge in India. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 48(2), 232–242.
10.
GoldarB. (2000). Employment growth in organized manufacturing in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 35(14), 1191–1195.
11.
GoldarB. (2011). Growth in organized manufacturing employment in recent years. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(7), 20–23.
12.
Government of India. (2006). Economic survey 2005–06. New Delhi: Department of Economic Affairs, Economic Division, Ministry of Finance.
13.
GuhaA. (2009). Labour market flexibility: An empirical inquiry into neoliberal propositions. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(19), 45–52.
14.
HahnF., & MatthewsR. C. O. (1964). The theory of economic growth: A survey. The Economic Journal, 74(296), 779–902.
15.
KannanK. P., & ReveendranG. (2009). Growth sans employment: A quarter century of jobless growth in India’s organized manufacturing. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(10), 80–91.
16.
KhanA. U. (2005). Regulating labour markets. In DebroyB. & KaushikP. D. (Eds), Reforming the labour market (pp. 77–107). New Delhi: Academic Foundation.
17.
LucasR. E. B. (1988). India’s industrial policy. In LucasE. B. Robert & PapanekG. (Eds), The Indian economy: Recent development and future prospects (pp. 185–202). Delhi: Oxford University Press.
18.
NagarajR. (1994). Employment and wages in manufacturing industries: Trends, hypothesis and evidence. Economic and Political Weekly, 29(4), 177–186.
19.
NagarajR. (2000). Organized manufacturing employment. Economic and Political Weekly, 35(38), 3445–3448.
20.
PapolaT. S. (1994). Structural adjustment, labour market, flexibility and employment. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 37(1), 3–16.
21.
PatelJ. S. (1974). The technological dependence of developing countries. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 12(1), 1–18.
22.
PatnaikP. (2011a). Labour market flexibility. People’s Democracy, 8May. Retrieved 20December2017, from http://archives.peoplesdemocracy.in/2011/0508_pd/05082011_10.html
RobinsonJ. (1979). Aspects of development and underdevelopment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
RoychowdhuryA. (2014). Labour market flexibility and conditions of labour in the era of globalisation: The Indian Experience. Ph.D. thesis, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.
26.
Second National Commission on Labour Report (SNCL Report). (2002). Report of the national commission on labour (Vols. I and II). New Delhi: Ministry of Labour, Government of India.
27.
SharmaN. A. (2006). Flexibility, employment and labour market reforms in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(21), 2078–2085.
28.
SundarK. R. S. (2005). Labour flexibility debate in India: A comprehensive review and some suggestions. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(21), 2274–2285.
29.
SundarK. R. S. (2009). Dynamics of labour in neoliberal times. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(50), 28–30.
30.
The World Bank. (1989). India: poverty, employment and social services, Chapter 4. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
31.
ZaghaR. (1999). Labour and India’s economic reforms. In SachsJ. D., VarshneyA. & BajpaiN. (Eds), India in the era of economic reforms (pp. 160–185). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
