Partner selection is critical for organisational performance for both core and non-core offerings of a firm. Using a multiple-case study, we analyse the partner selection process related to the firm’s non-core offerings. The analysis suggests that partner selection is a multiple-stage process rather than a single-stage process. Partners are evaluated against the first set of criteria comprising value offering and technological complexity, generating possible decision sets through trade-off. Once the first stage decision is favourable, partners are assessed against another set of criteria at the next stage. For low technological complexity, the criteria are propensity to scale up and competitive advantage, whereas for high technological complexity, the criteria are organisational compatibility and technological sophistication. The decision sets from the final stage conclude partner selection and possible on boarding.
ArrowK. J. (1974). The limits of organization. Norton.
2.
BadaraccoJ. L. (1988). General Motor’s Asian alliances. Harvard Business School Press.
3.
BaconE., WilliamsM. D., & DaviesG. (2020). Coopetition in innovation ecosystems: A comparative analysis of knowledge transfer configurations. Journal of Business Research, 115, 307–316.
4.
BarneyJ. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
5.
BaumJ. A. C., CalabreseT., & SilvermanB. S. (2000). Don’t go it alone: alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 267–294.
6.
BaumJ. A. C., & IngramP. (2002). Interorganizational learning and network organisation: toward a behavioral theory of the interfirm. In MarchJ. G. & AugierM. (Eds), The economics of change, choice, and structure: Essays in the memory of Richard M. Cyert (pp. 191–218). Edward Elgar.
7.
BeekunR. I., & GlickW. H. (2001a). Development and test of a contingency framework of coupling. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37, 385–407.
8.
BeekunR.I. & GlickW.H., (2001b). Organisation structure from a loose coupling perspective: A multi-dimensional approach. Decision Sciences, 32, 227–250.
9.
CannonJ. P., AchrolR. S., & GundlachG. T. (2000). Contracts, Norms, and plural form governance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 180–194.
10.
ChildJ., & FaulknerD. (1998). Strategies of cooperation: Managing alliances, networks and joint ventures. Oxford University Press.
11.
CohenW., & LevinthalD. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99, 569–596.
12.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
13.
DimovD., & MilanovH. (2010). The interplay of need and opportunity in venture capital investment syndication. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(4), 331–348.
DyerJ. H. & SinghH. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of inter-organisational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 600–679.
16.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 32, 532–550.
17.
EisenhardtK. M., & GraebnerM. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.
18.
GibbertM., RuigrokW., & WickiB. (2008). What passes as a rigorous case study?Strategic Management Journal, 29(13), 1465–1474.
19.
GioiaD. A., CorleyK. G., & HamiltonA. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organisational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.
20.
GurumurthyA., SoniG., PrakashS., & BadhotiyaG. K. (2013). Review on supply chain management research—An Indian perspective. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 2(1) 1–19.
21.
HahnR., & GoldS. (2014). Resources and governance in “base of the pyramid”-partnerships: Assessing collaborations between businesses and non-business actors. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1321–1333
22.
HarriganK. R. (1988). Strategic alliances and partner asymmetries. Management International Review, 28, 53–72.
23.
HarrisonJ. S., HittM. A., HoskissonR. E., & IrelandR. D. (1991). Synergies and post-acquisition performance: Difference versus similarities in resource allocations. Journal of Management, 17, 173–190.
24.
HarrisonJ. S., HittM. A., HoskissonR. E., & IrelandR. D. (2001). Resources complementary in business combinations: Extending the logic of organisation alliances. Journal of Management, 27, 679–690
25.
HennartJ. (1988). A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4), 361–374.
26.
HittM. A., DacinM. T., LevitasE., ArregleJ., & BorzaA. (2000). Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: Resource-based and organisational learning perspective. Academics of Management Journal, 43, 449–467.
27.
HittM. A., Harrison.J. S., & Ireland.R. D. (2001). Mergers and acquisitions: A guide to creating vaue for shareholders. Oxford University Press
28.
HoetkerG., & MellewigtT. (2009). Choice and performance of governance mechanisms: matching alliance governance to asset type. Strategic Management Journal, 30(10), 1025–1044.
29.
HofmanE., HalmanJ., & LooyB., (2016). Do design rules facilitate or complicate architectural innovation in innovation alliance networks?Research Policy, 45, 1436–1448.
30.
HowellsJ., JamesA.D. & MalikK., (2004). Sourcing external knowledge: A decision support framework for firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 27, 143–154.
31.
HuberG. P., & PowerD. J. (1985). Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management Journal, 6(2), 171–180.
32.
KaleP., SinghH., & PerlmutterH. (2000). Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 217–237.
33.
KapoorP. S; JayasimhaK. R., & SadhA. (2013). Brand-related, consumer to consumer, communication via social media. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 2(1), 43–59
34.
KohJ. & VenkatramanN. (1991). Joint venture formations and stock market reactions: An assessment in the information technology sector. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 869–892.
35.
LiaoS.-H., ChangW.-J., & LeeC.-C. (2008). Mining marketing maps for business alliances. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), 1338–1350.
36.
LiuY. S.. DeligonulS., CavusgilE., & ChiouJ. (2018). Always trust in old friends? Effects of reciprocity in bilateral asset specificity on trust in international B2B partnerships. Journal of Business Research, 90, 171–185.
37.
MarsdenP. V. (1990). Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 435–463.
38.
MatandaM. J., & FreemanS. (2009). Effect of perceived environmental uncertainty on exporter–importer inter-organisational relationships and export performance improvement. International Business Review, 18(1), 89–107.
39.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and Expanded from ‘Case Study Research in Education’, Jossey-Bass Publishers. In MetcalfeJ. S. (Ed.), Evolutionary economics and creative destruction (Vol. 1). Psychology Press.
40.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE Publications.
41.
MossT. W., Dahik LoorA. C., & Diaz ParadaF. (2021). Partnerships as an enabler of resourcefulness in generating sustainable outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106089
42.
MoweryD. C., OxleyJ. E., & SilvermanB. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 77–92.
43.
MurphyM., PerrotF., & Rivera-SantosM. (2012). New perspectives on learning and innovation in cross-sector collaborations. Journal of Business Research, 65(12), 1700–1709.
44.
OlavarrietaS., & EllingerA. E. (1997). Resource-based theory and strategic logistics research. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 27(9/10), 559–587.
45.
PisanoG. P. (1989). Using equity participation to support exchange: Evidence from the biotechnology industry. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 5, 109–126.
46.
PechlanerH., & VolggerM. (2012). How to promote cooperation in the hospitality industry: Generating practitioner-relevant knowledge using the GABEK qualitative research strategy. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 24(6), 925–945.
47.
PoppoL., & ZengerT. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707–725.
48.
PrattM.G., & RosaJ.A., (2003). Transforming work-family conflict into commitment in network marketing organisations. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 395–418.
49.
PuraniK.; SahadevS., & KumarD. S. (2014). Globalization and academic research: The case of sustainability marketing. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 3(1) 93–99.
50.
RaiJ. S., & SinghA, (2019). The impact of team association on attendees’ product knowledge and purchase intentions: A case of Indian Premier League. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 9(2), 1–11
51.
ReficcoE., & MarquezP. (2009). Inclusive networks for building BOP markets. Business & Society, 51(3), 512–556.
52.
Rivera-SantosM., RufínC., & KolkA. (2012). Bridging the institutional divide: Partnerships in subsistence markets. Journal of Business Research, 65(12), 1721–1727.
53.
RodanS. (2010). Structural holes and managerial performance: Identifying the underlying mechanisms. Social Networks, 32, 168–179.
54.
RostK., (2011). The strength of strong ties in the creation of innovation. Research Policy, 40, 588–604.
55.
SabelC. (1993). Studied trust: Building new form of cooperation in a volatile economy. Human Relations, 46(9), 1133–1170.
56.
SadovnikovaA., PujariA., & MikhailitchenkoA. (2016). Radical innovation in strategic partnerships: A framework for analysis. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1829–1833.
57.
ScuottoV., BeatriceO., ValentinaC.NicotraM., GioiaL. D., & BriamonteM. F. (2020). Uncovering the micro-foundations of knowledge sharing in open innovation partnerships: An intention-based perspective of technology transfer. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119906
58.
ShipilovA. V., & LiS. X. (2008). To have a cake and eat it too? Structural holes’ influence on status accumulation and market performance in collaborative networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(1), 73–108.
59.
SoekijadM., & AndriessenE. (2003). Conditions for knowledge sharing in competitive alliances. European Management Journal, 21(5), 578–587.
60.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications.
61.
StuartT. E. (2000). Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21(8), 791–811.
62.
TortorielloM., McEvilyB., & KrackhardtD. (2014). Being a catalyst of innovation: the role of knowledge diversity and network closure. Organization Science, 26(2), 423–438.
63.
TucchiC. L. (1996). Firm heterogeneity and performance of international strategic technology alliances [Paper presentation]. Strategic Management Society Annual Meeting, Mexico City, October 1996.
64.
Van MaanenJ. (1995). Crossroads style as theory. Organisation Science, 6(1), 133–143.
65.
Von HippelE. (1988). The sources of innovation. Oxford University Press.
66.
WalskeJ. M., ZacharakisA., & Smith-DoerrL. (2007). Effect of venture capital syndication networks on entrepreneurial success. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 27(3), 38–52.
67.
WassmerU. (2009). Alliance portfolios: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 36(1), 141–171.
68.
YinR. K. (2013). Validity and generalisation in future case study evaluations. Evaluation, 19(3), 321–332.
69.
ZaheerA., & SodaG. (2009). Network evolution: The origins of structural holes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 1–31.
