This article presents the application of the systems thinking and modelling methodology for analyzing multiple stakeholders with conflicting stakes. It illustrates this methodological framework using a New Zealand transport infrastructure case. By moving beyond the usual stakeholder analysis tools, comprising of matrices or lists of criteria or attributes, this study tries to plug the gap in the stakeholder literature pertaining to the need for a stakeholder analysis approach that can capture complex and dynamic issues in stakeholder management. The results of the experiments conducted, using a systems model developed in this study, highlight the need for holistic approaches instead of simple solutions, while dealing with complex problems involving multiple stakeholders.
AckoffR. (1974). Redesigning the future. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
2.
AghalayaS. N., EliasA. A., & PatiR. K. (2012). Analysing reverse logistics in the Indian pharmaceuticals industry: A systems approach. In 26th Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management (ANZAM) Conference, 5–7 December 2012 (pp. 1–18). Perth, Australia. ISBN: 978–0–9874158–0–6.
3.
BourneL., & WalkerD. H. T. (2005). Visualising and mapping stakeholder influence. Management Decision, 43(5), 649–660.
4.
BrocklesbyJ., & CummingsS. (1995). Combining hard, soft, and critical methodologies in systems research: The cultural constraints. Systems Research, 12(3), 239–245.
5.
DonaldsonT., & PrestonL. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
6.
EliasA. A. (2008). Towards a shared system model of stakeholders in environmental conflict. International Transactions of Operational Research, 15(2), 239–253.
7.
EliasA. A. (2012). A system dynamics model for stakeholder analysis in environmental conflicts. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55(3), 387–406.
8.
EliasA. A. (2016a). Analysing the stakes of stakeholders in research and development project management: A systems approach. R&D Management, 46(4), 749–760.
9.
EliasA. A. (2016b). Stakeholder analysis for lean six sigma project management. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 7(4), 394–405
10.
EliasA. A., CavanaR. Y., & JacksonL. S. (2001). Stakeholder analysis to enrich the systems thinking and modelling methodology. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference of the Systems Dynamics Society (pp. 52–53). Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
11.
EliasA. A. (2002). Stakeholder analysis for R&D project management. R&D Management, 32(4), 301–310.
12.
EliasA. A., & MathewS. K. (2015). Offshore IT outsourcing between India and New Zealand: A systemic analysis. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(3), 33–54.
13.
EliasA., & ZwikaelO. (2007). Stakeholder participation in project management: A New Zealand study. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management Operations Management Symposium. Melbourne.
14.
FreemanR. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman Publishing.
15.
FreemanR. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
16.
FreemanR. E., HarrisonJ. S., WicksA. C., ParmarB. L., & De ColleS. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press.
17.
Greater Wellington Regional Council. (2007). The Wellington regional land transport strategy, 2007–2016. Wellington: Greater Wellington Regional Council.
18.
MaaniK. E., & CavanaR. Y. (2007). Systems thinking and modelling: Understanding change and complexity. New Zealand: Prentice Hall.
19.
MendelowA. (1991). Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Information Systems. Cambridge, MA.
20.
MitchellR., AgleB., & WoodD. (1997). Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
21.
NarayanaS. A, EliasA. A., & PatiR. K. (2014). Reverse logistics in the pharmaceuticals industry: A systemic analysis. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 25(2), 379–398.
22.
NTZA (2016). About us. Retrieved from https://www.nzta.govt.nz/about-us
23.
RamirezR. (1999). Stakeholder analysis and conflict management. In BucklesD. (Ed.), Cultivating peace: Conflict and collaboration in natural resource management (pp. 101–126). Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre.
24.
RhenmanE. (1968). Organisationsplanering. Stockholm, Sweden: PA Norstedt & Soner.
25.
RichmondB., & PetersonS. (1997). An introduction to systems thinking. Hanover, NH: High Performance Systems.
26.
RowleyT. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of management Review, 22(4), 887–910
27.
SethiP. (1971). Up against the corporate wall. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
28.
StaveK. A. (2002). Using system dynamics to improve public participation in environmental decisions. System Dynamics Review, 18(2), 139–167.
29.
StermanJ. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. New York, NY: Irwin/McGraw Hill.
30.
Stuff (2015), Basin Reserve flyover project killed off by the High Court, Retrieved from http://www.stuff.co.nz/motoring/news/71325907/basin-reserve-flyover-project-killed-off-by-the-high-court
31.
Stuff (2014). Board of inquiry says ‘NO’ to Basin flyover, Retrieved from http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/10297832/Board-of-inquiry-says-NO-to-Basin-flyover
32.
TaylorB. (1971). The future development of corporate strategy. The Journal of Business Policy, 2(2), 22–38.
33.
VennixJ. A. M. (1996). Group model building: Facilitating team learning using system dynamics. Chichester: John Wiley.
