Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a buzzword worldwide. In today’s globalized world, one of the great challenges faced by firms is integration of CSR in business. Stakeholders require a lot more from companies than merely pursuing growth and profitability. They demand information about economic, social and environmental performances of the companies. Previous studies in developed countries have confirmed that a true and sincere corporate communication leads to the building of stakeholders’ trust. There is, however, a dearth of such studies in developing countries such as India. This study is an attempt to bridge the gap by conducting an exploratory study on how the top management of a company reports CSR. Using the technique of content analysis, this article assessed the extent and nature of CSR reporting by Indian companies. We used multiple regression analysis to evaluate how well a set of predictors explain the social disclosure practices of Indian firms. The results indicated that there is no significant relationship between a firm’s profitability and its corporate social disclosure (CSD). However, a firm’s ownership (private sector or public sector) has influence on CSD practices. The findings also suggest that firm size has a positive association with CSD under the community development theme. This implies that large companies with public visibility favour community development. Finally, the study ends with a conclusion that has strong managerial implications: sincere and honest social reporting can harness a better relationship with all stakeholders.
AbbottW. F., & MonsenR. J. (1979). On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self-reported disclosure as method of a measuring corporate social involvement. Academy of Measurement Journal, 22(3), 501–515.
2.
AbramsF. (1951). Management responsibilities in a complex world. Harvard Business Review, 29(5), 29–34.
3.
AlonI., LattemanC., FetscherinM., LiS., & SchneiderA. M. (2010). Usage of public corporate communications of social responsibility in Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC). International Journal of Emerging Markets, 5(1), 6–22.
4.
AmranA., & DeviS. S. (2008). The impact of government and foreign affiliate influence on corporate social reporting: The case of Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(4), 386–404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02686900810864327
5.
AnasA., RashidH. M. A., & AnnuarH. A. (2015). The effect of award on CSR disclosures in annual reports of Malaysian PLCs. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(4), 1–28.
6.
BarnardC. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BasalamahA. S., & JermiasJ. (2005). Social and environmental reporting and auditing in Indonesia. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 7(1), 109–127.
8.
BaskinJ. (2006). Corporate Responsibility in Emerging Markets. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 24 (December), 29–47.
9.
BatraG. S. (1996). Dynamics of social auditing in corporate enterprises: A study of the Indian corporate sector. Managerial Auditing Journal, 11(2), 36–45.
10.
BebbingtonJ., GrayR.H. & OwenD. (1999). Seeing the Wood for the Trees: Taking the Pulse of Social and Environmental Accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 12(1), 47–52.
11.
BelalA. R. (2001). A study of corporate social disclosures in Bangladesh. Managerial Auditing Journal, 76(5), 274–289.
12.
BelkaouiA., & KarpikP. G. (1989). Determinants of the corporate decision to disclose social information. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2(1), 36–51.
13.
BhatiaA., & TuliS. (2014). An empirical analysis of sustainability disclosure practices: Evidence from India and China. IIM Kozhikode Society and Management Review, 3(2), 135–148.
14.
BirthG., IlliaL., LauratiF., & ZampariniA. (2008). Communicating CSR: Practices among Switzerland’s top 300 companies. Corporate Communication: An International Journal, 13(2), 182–196.
15.
BoessoG., & KumarK. (2007). Drivers of corporate voluntary disclosure: A framework and empirical evidence from Italy and the United States. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(2), 269–296.
16.
BrancoM. C., & RodriguesL. L. (2006). Communication of corporate social responsibility by Portuguese banks: A legitimacy theory perspective. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11(3), 232–248.
17.
ChapelW., & JeremyM. (2005). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A seven-country study of CSR web site reporting. Business and Society, 44(4), 415–447.
18.
CornelissenJ. (2004). Corporate communications, theory and practice. London: SAGE Publications.
19.
CowenS. S., FerreriL. B., & ParkerL. D. (1987). The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2), 111–122.
20.
De VilliersC., & Van StadenС. J. (2006). Can less environmental disclosure have a legitimizing effect? Evidence from Africa. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(8), 763–781.
21.
DonaldsonT., & PrestonL. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
22.
EellsR. (1960). The meaning of modern business. New York: Columbia University Press.
23.
ElkingtonJ. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing Ltd.
24.
Ernst & Ernst. (1978). Social responsibility disclosure: Survey of Fortune 500 annual reports. Cleveland, OH: Ernst & Ernst.
25.
FreemanR. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Ballinger.
26.
FriedmanM. (1970, September13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 32–33, 122–124.
27.
FroomanJ. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. The Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205.
28.
GolobU., & BartlettJ. L. (2007). Communicating about corporate social responsibility: A comparative study of CSR reporting in Australia and Slovenia. Public Relations Review, 33(1), 1–9.
29.
GrayR., KouhyR., & LaversS. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77.
30.
GrayR., OwenD., & MaundersK. (1987). Corporate social reporting: Accounting and accountability. London: Prentice-Hall.
31.
GrayR. H. (2002). Of messiness, systems and sustainability: Towards a more social and environmental finance and accounting. British Accounting Review, 34(4) December, 357–386
32.
GuthrieJ. E., & MathewsM. R. (1985). Corporate social accounting in Australasia. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 7, 251–277.
33.
GuthrieJ. E., & ParkerL. D. (1990). Corporate social disclosure practice: A comparative international analysis. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 3, 159–175.
34.
HackstonD., & MilneM. J. (1996). Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(1), 77–108.
35.
HaniffaR. M., & CookeT. E. (2005). The impact of culture and corporate governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391–430.
36.
HuangT., & WangA. (2010). Sustainability reports in China: Content analysis. International Conference on Future Information Technology and Management Engineering, 2, 154–158. doi:10.1109/FITME.2010.5654711
37.
ImamS. (2000). Corporate social performance reporting in Bangladesh. Managerial Auditing Journal, 15(3), 133–141.
38.
IngramR. W., & FrazierK. B. (1980). Environmental performance and corporate disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(2), 614–622.
39.
KansalM., & SinghS. (2012). Measurement of corporate social performance: An Indian perspective. Social Responsibility Journal, 8(4), 527–546.
40.
KPMG. (2005). KPMG International survey of corporate responsibility reporting. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: KPMG.
41.
KPMG. (2013). India corporate social responsibility survey 2013. Retrieved from https://home.kpmg.com/xx/en/home/insights/2013/12/kpmg-survey-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2013.html (assessed on 10October2015)
42.
KrippendorffK. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
43.
MahadeoJ. D., Oogarah-HanumanV., & SoobaroyenT. (2011). A longitudinal study of corporate disclosures in a developing economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(4), 545–558.
44.
MaonF., LindgreenA., & SwaenV. (2009). Designing and implementing corporate social responsibility: An integrative framework grounded in theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 71–89.
45.
MathewsM. R. (1997). Twenty-five years of social and environmental accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10(4), 481–531.
46.
MattinglyJ. E. (2004). Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 520–523.
47.
MilneM. J., & AdlerR. W. (1999). Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 12(3), 237–256.
48.
MurthyV. (2008). Corporate social disclosure practices of top software firm in India. Global Business Review, 9(2), 173–188.
49.
MuttakinM. B., & SubramanianN. (2015). Firm ownership and board characteristics: Do they matter corporate social responsibility disclosure of Indian companies?Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 6(2), 138–165.
50.
PattenD. M. (1991). Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting & Public Policy, 10(4), 297–308.
51.
PiacentiniM., MacFadyenL., & EadieD. (2000). Corporate social responsibility in food retailing. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 28(11), 459–469.
52.
PreussL., & BarkemeyerR. (2011). CSR priorities of emerging economy firms: Is Russia a different shape of BRIC?Corporate Governance, 11(4), 371–385.
53.
RamanS. R. (2006). Corporate social reporting in India: A view from the top. Global Business Review, 7(2), 313–324. doi: 10.1177/097215090600700208.
54.
RatanajongkolS., DaveyH., & LowM. (2006). Corporate social reporting in Thailand: The news is all good and increasing. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 3(1), 67–83.
55.
RobertsR. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595–612.
56.
RowleyT., & BermanS. L. (2000). A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Business and Society Review, 39(4), 397–418.
57.
SharmaA., & KiranR. (2012). Corporate social responsibility in changing markets: New mechanism and newer initiatives. African Journal of Business Management, 6(16), 5479–5490.
58.
ShenC. H., & ChangY. (2009). Ambition versus conscience, does corporate social responsibility pay off? The application of matching methods. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 133–153.
59.
SinghD. R., & AhujaJ. M. (1983). Corporate social reporting in India. International Journal of Accounting Education & Research, 18(2), 150–169.
60.
SinghA., & VermaP. (2014). From philanthropy to mandatory CSR: A journey towards mandatory corporate social responsibility in India. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 3(8), 72–78.
61.
SmithA. (1937). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Modern Library edition. New York: Random House.
62.
SteurerR. (2006). Mapping stakeholder theory anew: From the ‘stakeholder theory of the firm’ to three perspectives on business–society relations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 55–61.
63.
TeohH. Y., & ThongG. (1984). Another look at corporate social responsibility and reporting: An empirical study in a developing country. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9(2), 189–206.
64.
UNDP, India British Council, CII, PricewaterhouseCoopers Report. (2002). Corporate social responsibility survey. Retrieved from http://www.britishcouncil.org/indiarights-csrsurvey_report_2002.pdf
65.
UnermanJ. (2000). Methodological issues: Reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(5), 667–681.
66.
WanderleyL. S. O., LucianR., FaracheF., & de Sousa FilhoJ. M. (2008). CSR information disclosure on the web: A context-based approach analyzing the influence of country of origin and industry sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 369–378.
67.
ZakimiF., & HamidA. (2004). Corporate social disclosure by banks and finance companies: Malaysian evidence. Corporate Ownership and Control, 1(4), 118–130.
68.
ZeghalD., & AhmedS. A. (1990). Comparison of social responsibility information disclosure media used by Canadian firms. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 3(1), 38–53.
