The present study seeks to access and compare the sustainability reporting practices in two major economies, that is, India and China. Index developed under global reporting initiative (GRI) guidelines is used. Content analysis is employed as a data collection tool. A total of 17 companies from BSE-30 (India) and 19 companies from SSE 50 (China), producing sustainability reports within the time period 2006–2007 to 2010–2011, comprise the sample set. Independent sample t test is used to compare the disclosure practices of India and China. Also, Kruskal–Wallis H test is applied for inter-category and inter-industry comparison of both countries. The results reveal that the sustainability disclosure scores are higher with respect to Indian companies as compared to Chinese companies. The results of independent sample t test are also significant at 1 per cent level of significance. However, Kruskal–Wallis H test suggests insignificant differences in the category-wise and industry-wise disclosure scores of both countries, that is, India and China. It is strongly recommended that China should strive more for sustainability practices in order to keep pace with its counterpart, that is, India.
AlonI.LattemanC.FetscherinM.LiS.SchneiderA.-M. (2010). Usage of public corporate communications of social responsibility in Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC). International Journal of Emerging Markets, 5(1), 6–22.
2.
BaskinJ. (2006). Value, values and sustainability: Corporate responsibility in emerging market companies. Retrieved from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1094573orhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1094573
3.
BelalA. R. (2001). A study of corporate social disclosures in Bangladesh. Managerial Auditing Journal, 16(5), 274–289.
4.
BSR, Going local, increasing the value of local sustainability. (October2010). Retrieved from http://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR_Going_Local.final.pdf
5.
ChatterjeeB.MirM. Z. (2008). The current status of environmental reporting by Indian companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(6), 609–629.
6.
DaubC.-H. (2007). Assessing the quality of sustainability reporting: An alternative methodological approach,Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 75–85.
7.
DillingP. F. A. (2010). Sustainability reporting in a global context: What are the characteristics of corporations that provide high quality sustainability reports—An empirical analysis. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 9(1), 19–30.
8.
ElkingtonJ. (2004). Enter the triple bottom line. 1–16. Retrieved from http://kmhassociates.ca/resources/1/Triple%20Bottom%20Line%20a%20history%201961-2001.pdf
9.
ErlandssonM.OlinderM. (2009). Environmental sustainability reporting—Development in Sweden 1998–2008, Bachelor Thesis, University of Gothenburg, 1–75, Retrieved from http://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/20810/1/gupea_2077_20810_1.pdf
10.
EvansC. (2003). Corporate social responsibility—sustainability: The bottom line, Accountancy,131, 6.
11.
GuthrieJ.FarnetiF. (2008). GRI sustainability reporting by Australian public sector organizations. Public Money and Management, 28(6), 361–366.
12.
HuangT.WangA. (2010). Sustainability reports in China: Content analysis. International Conference on Future Information Technology and Management Engineering, 154–158. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=05654711
13.
JoseA.LeeS.-M. (2007). Environmental reporting of global corporations: A content analysis based on website disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4), 307–321.
14.
KhavehA.NikhasemiS. R.HaqueA.YousefiA. (2012). Voluntary sustainability disclosure, revenue, and shareholders wealth–A perspective from Singaporean companies. Business Management Dynamics, 1(9), 6–12.
15.
KnoepfelI. (2001). Dow Jones sustainability group index: A global benchmark for corporate sustainability. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 8(1), 6–15.
16.
KolkA. (2010). Trajectories of sustainability reporting by MNC’s. Journal of World Business, 45(4), 367–374.
17.
KolkA.HongP.Van DolenW. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in China: An analysis of domestic and foreign retailers’ sustainability dimension. Business Strategy and Environment, 19(5), 289–303.
18.
KPMG. (2008). Sustainability reporting a guide, 1–32. Retrieved from http://www.kpmg.com/AU/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/Sustainability-Reporting-A-guide.pdf
19.
LattemannC.FetscherinM.AlonI.LiS.SchneiderA.-M. (2009). CSR communication intensity in Chinese and Indian multinational companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 426–442.
20.
LiN.ToppinenA.TuppuraA.PuumalainenK.HujalaM. (2011). Determinants of sustainability disclosure in the Global Forest Industry. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 16(1), 33–40.
21.
MadsenH.SindingK.UlhoiJ. P. (1997). Sustainability and corporate environmental focus: An analysis of Danish small and medium sized companies. Managerial and Decision Economics, 18(6), 443–453.
22.
MakB. L. M.ChanW. W. (2007). A study of environmental reporting: International Japanese airlines. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 12(4), 303–312.
23.
MarrewijkM. VanWereM. (2003). Multiple levels of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 107–119.
24.
McWilliamsA.SiegelD. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.
25.
MorsingM.SchultzM. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European View, 15(4), 323–338.
26.
MurthyV. (2008). Corporate social disclosure practices of top software firms in India. Global Business Review, 9(2), 173–188.
27.
Pearson Science 8: 5.2 Energy changes—Future Sparks (2012). Retrieved from futuresparks.org.au/.../pearson_science_8_sb_chapter_5_unit_5.2.pdf
28.
PreussL.BarkemeyerR. (2011). CSR priorities of emerging economy firms: Is Russia a different shape of BRIC?Corporate Governance, 11(4), 371–385.
29.
QuickR. (2008–2006). Voluntary sustainability reporting practices in Germany: A study on reporting quality. Portuguese Journal of Accounting and Management, 5, 7–35.
30.
RaarJ. (2002). Environmental initiatives: Towards triple bottom line reporting. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 7(3), 169–183.
31.
RatanajongkolS.DaveyH.LowM. (2006). Corporate social reporting in Thailand. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 3(1), 67–83.
32.
RobertsD. H.KoeplinJ. P. (2007). Sustainability reporting practices in Portugal: Greenwashingor triple bottom line. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 6(9), 29–40.
33.
SahayA. (2004). Environmental reporting by Indian corporations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11(1), 12–22.
34.
ShahS.BhaskarA. S. (2010). Natural environment management at Larsen & Toubro’s ECC division—a case study. Asia-Pacific Business Review, VI(1), 115–121.
35.
SIRAN, KLD, & Social Investment Forum (2008). Sustainability reporting in emerging markets, 1–23. Retrieved from http://www.unpri.org/files/EMDP/2008%20SIRAN%20sustainability%20reporting%20in%20Emerging%20Markets.pdf
36.
TD Corprate Responsibility Report (2011). Rerieved from http://www.tdcanadatrust.com/easyweb5/crr-2011/environment/financing/risk_profile.jsp
37.
ZwetslootG. I. J. M.MarrewijkM. N. A. van (2004). From quality to sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(2), 79–82.
