This study examines the role of the ritual economy in maintaining socio-economic stability within the Tangkhul community of Kangpokpi district, Manipur. Despite the influence of modernisation, such as the introduction of Christianity and education, which have led to the decline of many traditional rituals, core practices like marriage ceremonies, seed-sowing festivals and meat distribution continue to play crucial roles in the community’s economic and social life. By analysing these rituals, this paper suggests that they serve as vital mechanisms of resource redistribution, social cohesion and cultural preservation. Specifically, marriage rituals facilitate wealth exchange and strengthen familial bonds, while seed-sowing festivals promote agricultural productivity and community cooperation. Additionally, the practice of distributing specific portions of hunted game to particular kin, such as the maternal uncle, married sister and eldest brother, illustrates a culturally embedded system of meat sharing governed by kinship norms and customary obligations. Through ethnographic research, this paper demonstrates how these persistent ritual practices remain central to the economic stability and communal solidarity of the Tangkhul, despite challenges posed by religious and socio-economic changes.
AdamsK. M. (2006). Art as politics: Re-crafting identities, tourism, and power in Tana Toraja, Indonesia. University of Hawaii Press.
2.
BlochM., & ParryJ. (Eds.). (1989). Money and the morality of exchange. Cambridge University Press.
3.
DoveM. R. (1985). The agroecological mythology of the Javanese and the political economy of Indonesia. Indonesia, 39, 1–36.
4.
Evans-PritchardE. E. (1940). The Nuer: A description of the modes of livelihood and political institutions of a Nilotic people. Oxford University Press.
5.
GodelierM. (1999). The enigma of the gift(N. Scott, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.(Original work published 1996).
6.
GraeberD. (2011). Debt: The first 5,000 years. Melville House.
7.
GregoryC. A. (2015). Gifts and commodities(2nd ed.). HAU Books.
8.
GurvenM. (2004). To give and to give not: The behavioral ecology of human food transfers. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(4), 543–583.
9.
HodgsonD. L. (2001). Once intrepid warriors: Gender, ethnicity, and the cultural politics of Maasai development. Indiana University Press.
10.
HoramR. (2019). The Tangkhul Naga traditional custom of marriage. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 6(3), 600–606.
11.
IvashchenkoY. S., & IvanovA. A. (2019). Ritual exchange and its economic aspects in traditional culture. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 333, 57–61.
12.
JamirA. (2018). Christianity and socio-cultural change among the Ao Nagas. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 23(4), 60–64.
13.
JoyR. (2014). Polytheism to monotheism: Impact of Christianity among the Tangkhul Naga tribe of North-East India. South Asian Anthropologist, 14(1), 73–80.
14.
KeaneW. (2007). Christian moderns: Freedom and fetish in the mission encounter. University of California Press.
15.
KeishamS. S., & ShimrayR. G. G. J. (2021). Tangkhul traditional system of education and its relevance in the modern Indian context. Gorteria Journal, 34(1), 275–309.
16.
KosterJ. (2011). Interhousehold meat sharing among Mayangna and Miskito horticulturalists in Nicaragua. Human Nature, 22, 394–415.
17.
KrasniqiL. (2023). Cultural resilience in the face of globalization: An anthropological exploration of traditional societies’ adaptation strategies and identity dynamics. Interdisciplinary Journal Papier, 4(4), 31–38.
18.
LeachE. R. (1964). Political systems of highland Burma: A study of Kachin social structure. Fletcher and Son.
19.
LongkumerA. (2010). Reform, identity and narratives of belonging: The Heraka movement in Northeast India. Continuum.
20.
MaussM. (2002). The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies(W. D. Halls, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1925).
21.
NongbriB. L. (2016). Change and continuity: An analysis of the interaction of Khasi traditional religion with Christianity. In MalekandathilP., PachuaaJ. L. K., & SarkarT. (Eds.), Christianity in Indian history: Issues of culture, power and knowledge (pp. 58–75). Primus Books.
22.
PeelJ. D. Y. (2000). Religious encounter and the making of the Yoruba. Indiana University Press.
23.
PolanyiK. (1944). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Beacon Press.
24.
RamshanO. T. (2023). Journey into the past: Reliving the village life of pre-colonial Tangkhul Naga society. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 10(3), 181–190.
25.
RobbinsJ. (2004). Becoming sinners: Christianity and moral torment in a Papua New Guinea society. University of California Press.
26.
RuivahK. (1993). Social change among the Nagas (Tangkhul). Cosmo Publications.
27.
SahlinsM. (1972). Stone age economics. Routledge.
28.
ShangpamK. (2012). Impact of Christianity on the Tangkhuls of Ukhrul town, Manipur(Doctoral Dissertation, North Eastern Hill University). Shodhganga. http://hdl.handle.net/10603/169481
29.
ShimrayR. A. (2014). Traditional human relationship with nature: With special reference to the Tangkhul Naga. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 4(2), 1–4.
30.
ThanmungM. (2015). Christianity and social change among the Naga tribes of Manipur. Language in India, 15(2), 256–267.
31.
TuckerB., & NelsonD. R. (2017). What does economic anthropology have to contribute to studies of risk and resilience?Economic Anthropology, 4(2), 161–172.
32.
TurnerV. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Aldine Publishing Company.
33.
TurnerV. (1974). Dramas, fields, and metaphors: Symbolic action in human society. Cornell University Press.
34.
VarekanA. S. (2024). Once self-sufficient and egalitarian tribal economy transformed into dependent economy: The Tangkhul economy. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 12(5), 611–618.
35.
WatanabeJ. M. (2007). Ritual economy and the negotiation of autarky and interdependence in a ritual mode of production. In WellsE. C. & Davis-SalazarK. L. (Eds.), Mesoamerican ritual economy: Archaeological and ethnological perspectives (pp. 301–322). University Press of Colorado.
36.
WellsE. C., & Davis-SalazarK. L. (2007). Mesoamerican ritual economy: Materialization as ritual and economic process. In WellsE. C. & Davis-SalazarK. L. (Eds.), Mesoamerican ritual economy: Archaeological and ethnological perspectives (pp. 1–26). University Press of Colorado.
37.
WellsE. C., & McAnanyP. A. (Eds.). (2012). Dimensions of ritual economy. Emerald Group Publishing.
