Rethinking Sustainability from a Gandhian Perspective: A Discourse on Cognitive Justice

Abstract

It was Gandhi who gave centrality to plural ways of thinking and knowing. His entire life and work are directed against the hegemonic order of knowledge production and dissemination. The hegemonic forms of knowledge spearheaded by scientism produce hierarchies between those who possess and profess it and those who do not. Other forms of knowing and acting upon, with and within the environment are rendered illegitimate and unscientific. It is within this context that we need to rethink the concept of sustainability that has emerged as another form of bio-power. Those ontologies that result in unsustainable activities and damage to the environment are also the ones through which sustainability is understood. It is now time to rethink and reimagine the entire discourse on sustainability from a Gandhian perspective that provides an antithesis to the dominant ideologies. The alternative ways of connecting with the environment and a need for a ‘politics’ that brings these alternative debates to the centre of our consciousness are something where Gandhian philosophy shows us the way.

This article tries to understand the concept of sustainability as bio-power and how the Gandhian perspective re-centres this debate around issues of relational ontology, pluriverse and cognitive justice. The utilitarian conception and an occupying ontology towards the environment led to a concept of sustainability powered by scientism. Opposed to this conception is the Gandhian perspective that gives ample space to the locals and the idea of ‘self’ in order to bring about sustainable development. The article also argues that the criticism directed against Gandhi regarding bringing up the issue of ‘moral politics’ through his idea of self is also unfounded and needs to be rejected. Gandhian ideas do not absolve the state from its responsibilities towards its people and the environment, but they bring in the active agency of the people and the ‘self’ in the process of bringing about change in the society.

Keywords

Gandhi sustainability bio-power relational ontology pluriverse occupying ontology cognitive justice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brightman

, & Lewis

(Eds). (2017). The anthropology of sustainability: Beyond development and progress . Palgrave Macmillan.

D’Souza

(2006). Drowned and dammed: Colonial capitalism and flood control in Eastern India . Oxford University Press.

Dasmann

(1976). Future primitive: Ecosystem people versus biosphere people. CoEvolution Quarterly , 11, 26–31.

De Sousa Santos

(2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide . Routledge.

Escobar

(2017). Sustaining the pluriverse: The political ontology of territorial struggles in Latin America. In Brightman

& Lewis J

(Eds.), The anthropology of sustainability: Beyond development and progress (pp. 237–256). Palgrave Macmillan.

Faubion

(Ed.). (2000). Power: The essential works of Michael Foucault (Vol. 3). New York Press.

Foucault

(1991). Governmentality. In Graham

, Colin

, & Peter

(Eds), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). University of Chicago Press.

Foucault

(1997). The birth of biopolitics. In Paul

(Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 73–79). The New York Press.

Gadgil

, & Guha

(1992). This fissured land: An ecological history of India . Oxford University Press.

10.

Gandhi

M. K.

(1947). India of my dreams . Navjeevan Trust.

11.

Ghosh

(2016). The great derangement: Climate change and the unthinkable . Penguin Random House.

12.

Givens

T. E.

(2021). Radical empathy: Finding a path to bridging radical divides . Bristol University Press.

13.

Joshi

P. C.

(2017). Human rights, wild life and environment protection. Social Change , 47(1), 1–10.

14.

Joshi

P. C.

, & Khattri

(2019). On Gandhi and sanitation. Journal of Anthropological Survey of India , 68(2), 1–15.

15.

Khattri

(2018). Rethinking sustainability – A process facilitating change: From an anthropological perspective. World Focus , 39(8), 1–11.

16.

Khattri

, & Joshi

P. C.

(2015). Biomedicalization and Gandhi’s vision of health: Observations from Sevagram. Economic & Political Weekly , 50(10), 53–58.

17.

Legg

, & Heath

(Eds). (2018). South Asian governmentalities: Michel Foucault and the question of postcolonial ordering . Cambridge University Press.

18.

Mitra

R. P.

(2019). Mahatma Gandhi and Tribal Development. Journal of Anthropological Survey of India , 68(2), 234–244.

19.

Naess

(1989). Ecology, community and lifestyle: Outline of an ecosophy . Cambridge University Press.

20.

Parekh

(1989). Gandhi’s political philosophy: A critical examination . Macmillan.

21.

Singer

(2000). Marx: A very short introduction . Oxford University Press.

22.

Srivastava

V. K.

(2019). Editorial (special issue on Gandhi). Journal of Anthropological Survey of India , 68(2), 135–141.

23.

Srivastava

V. K.

(2020). The Mahatma and anthropology [Lecture no. 3. Gandhian thought and its contemporary relevance. Short-term course. August 25–31]. Human Resource Development Center. University of Allahabad.

24.

Sundar

(2005). The construction and destruction of ‘Indigenous’ knowledge in India’s joint forest management program. In Ellen

, Parkes

& Bicker

(Eds), Indigenous environmental knowledge and its transformations: Critical anthropological perspectives (pp. 79–100). Taylor and Francis e-library.

25.

Verma

, Ram

, Ginwal

, Pande

, & Bisht

P. S.

(2023). Mahatma Gandhi’s view on environment and sustainable development. Journal of Foundational Research , XXXI(2), 1–9.