Video Caravan in Engaging Development: Reflexivity,Agency and Bridging Communication

Abstract

The relation between indigenous people and development agencies is much discussed in anthropology (Bicker et al., 2004; Pottier et al., 2003; Sillitoe et al., 2002). This relation is more often than not, one of conflict. A conflict that builds from distrust by the people on the development agent and disrespect from the latter on the former. The research on which this article is based addresses this conflict by recording the voice of the Konda Reddis, an indigenous group, through video for development communication. The video recorded peoples’ responses periodically to the key question, ‘is life in the hills or in the resettlement colony better, and why?’ Playing back these videos to the different respondents, including officials responsible for the development programme, in between responses was attempted to help them reflect on what they had said earlier in relation to what others had said, allowing room for them to reflect and respond again. The camera and video recording became the medium of real space and time, bringing the Konda Reddis, development agents and the anthropologist in conversation with each other.

Keywords

Engaged anthropology reflexivity participatory video indigenous people development

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bicker

, Sillitoe

, & Pottier

(Eds.). (2004). Development and local knowledge. New approaches to issues in natural resources management, conservation, and agriculture . Routledge.

Davies

C. A.

(2008). Reflexive ethnography: A guide to researching selves and others . Routledge.

Demmer

(2008). Contested modernities in the “Tribal zone”: The post-Colonial State, Adivasi politics and the making of local modernity in the Northern Nilgiris (South India). Zeitschrift Für Ethnologie , 133(2), 257–282.

Escobar

(1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World . Princeton University Press.

Gewertz

, & Errington

(1991). Twisted histories. Altered contexts: Representing the Chambri in a World System . Cambridge University Press.

Gross

, & Platner

(2002). Commentary: Anthropology as social work: Collaborative models of anthropological research. Anthropology News , 43(8), 4.

Herzfeld

(2010). Engagement, gentrification, and the neoliberal hijacking of History. Current Anthropology , 51(2), S259–S268.

Hobart

(1993). An anthropological critique of development: The growth of ignorance . Routledge.

Johnston

B. R.

(2010). Social responsibility and the anthropological citizen. Current Anthropology , 51(2), S235–S248.

10.

Kirsch

(2006). Reverse anthropology: Indigenous analysis of social and environmental relations in New Guinea . Stanford University Press.

11.

T. M.

(2007). The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics . Duke University Press.

12.

Mummidi

(2020). The impact of attempted resettlement on the Konda Reddis, South India. In Layton

(Ed.), The anthropology of displaced communities (pp. 107–124). Sean Kingston.

13.

Mummidi

(2021). Realigning dispossession and negotiating development: The Konda Reddis’ ‘Capacity to aspire’. Sociological Bulletin . https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920970315

14.

Novellino

(2003). From seduction to miscommunication: The confession and presentation of local knowledge in participatory development. In Pottier

, Bicker

, & Sillitoe

(Eds.), Negotiating local knowledge: Power and identity in development (pp. 273–297). Pluto Press.

15.

Pottier

, Bicker

, & Sillitoe

(Eds.). (2003). Negotiating local knowledge: Power and identity in development . Pluto Press.

16.

Shah

(2017). Ethnography? Participant observation, a potentially revolutionary praxis. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory , 7(1), 45–59.

17.

Sillitoe

, Bicker

, & Pottier

(Eds.). (1998). The development of indigenous knowledge: A new applied anthropology. Current Anthropology , 39(2), 223–252.

18.

Sillitoe

, Bicker

, & Pottier

(Eds.). (2002). Participating in development: Approaches to indigenous knowledge . Routledge.

19.

Sundar

(Ed.). (2016). The Scheduled Tribes and their India . Oxford University Press.

20.

Xaxa

(2003). Tribes in India. In Das

(Ed.), The Oxford India companion to sociology and social anthropology (pp. 373–408). Oxford University Press.

21.

Xaxa

, Usha

, Bara

, Kamal

, Bang

, Basant

, & Panda

(2014). Report of the high-level committee on socio-economic, health and educational status of Tribal communities of India . Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India. https://archive.nyu.edu/handle/2451/36746