Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study examines the ability of the uses and gratifications construct to explain the motivations (gratifications sought) and the satisfactions (gratifications obtained) of college students' newspaper reading. This study also explores similarities and differences between U.S. and Korean college students' newspaper-reading behavior. One major finding is that Korean students spend more time reading newspapers than do Americans. The findings of this study support the existence of at least three distinct dimensions of gratifications sought in the Korean sample: interaction utility, information seeking, and diversion factor. In the U.S. sample, on the other hand, there were four distinct dimensions of gratifications sought: information-seeking, interaction utility, decisional utility, and diversion. This study concludes that the gratifications sought factors of the two countries are highly similar although not completely identical.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blumler

(1979). “The Role of Theory in Uses and Gratifications Studies,” Communication Research 6, pp. 9–36

Blumler

Gurevitch

Katz

(1985). “Reaching out: A Future for Gratifications Research,” pp. 255–73. in Rosengren

Wenner

Palmgreen

(eds), Media Gratifications Research: Current Perspectives. Beverly Hills: Sage

Elliot

(1974). “Uses and Gratifications Research: A Critique and Sociological Alternatives,” pp. 249–68. in Blumler

Katz

(eds), The Uses of Mass Communication. Beverly Hills: Sage

Elliott

W. R.

Resenberg

W. L.

(1987). “The 1985 Philadelphia Newspaper Strike: A Uses and Gratifications Study,” Journalism Quarterly 64, pp. 678–87

Fishbein

Ajzen

(1975). Beliefs, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior. Reading: Addison-Wesley

Greenberg

B. S.

(1974). Gratifications of Television Viewing and Their Correlations with British Children, pp. 71–92. in Blumler

J. G.

Katz

(eds), The Uses of Mass Communications. Beverly Hills: Sage

Hall

E. T.

(1977). Beyond Culture. Garden City: Doubleday

Hofstede

(1980). Culture's Consequences. Newbury Park: Sage

Levy

(1978). “Television News Uses: A Cross-National Comparison,” Journalism Quarterly 55, pp. 334–37

10.

Lichtenstein

Rosenfeld

L. B.

(1983). Uses and Misuses of Gratifications Research: An Explication of Media Functions, Communication Research 10, pp. 97–109

11.

McCombs

(1977). “Newspaper Readership and Circulation,” in ANPA News Research Report No. 3. Reston: ANPA News Research Bureau

12.

Palmgreen

(1984). “Uses and Gratifications: A Theoretical Perspective,” pp. 20–55. in Bostrom

R. N.

(eds), Communication Yearbook 8. Beverly Hills: Sage

13.

Palmgreen

Rayburn

(1982). “Gratifications Sought and Media Exposure: An Expectancy-Value Model,” Communication Research 9, pp. 561–80

14.

Palmgreen

Rayburn

(1985). “A Comparison of Gratification Models of Media Satisfaction,” Communication Monographs, 52, pp. 334–46

15.

Palmgreen

Wenner

Rayburn

(1980). “Relationships between Gratification Sought and Obtained: A Study of Television News,” Communication Research 7, pp. 161–92

16.

Payne

G. A.

Severn

J. J. H.

Dozier

D. M.

(1988). “Uses and Gratifications Motives as Indicators of Magazine Readership,” Journalism Quarterly 65, pp. 909–13

17.

Rosengren

K. E.

(1974). “Uses and Gratifications: A Paradigm Outlined,” pp. 269–86. in Blumler

Katz

(eds.), The Uses of Mass Communication. Beverly Hills: Sage

18.

Rubin

A. M.

Perse

E. M.

(1987). “Audience Activity and Television News Gratifications,” Communication Research 14, pp. 58–84

19.

Swanson

D. L.

(1977). “The Uses and Misuses of Uses and Gratifications,” Human Communication Research 3, pp. 214–21

20.

Swanson

D. L.

(1979). “Political Communication Research and the Uses and Gratifications Model: A Critique,” Communication Research 6, pp. 36–53

21.

Swanson

D. L.

Babrow

A. S.

(1989). “Uses and Gratifications: The Influence of Gratification-Seeking and Expectancy-Value Judgments on the Viewing of Television News,” pp. 361–375. in Dervin

Grossberg

O'Keefe

Wartella

(eds), Rethinking Communication: Paradigm Exemplars. Newbury Park: Sage

22.

Towers

W. M.

(1985). “Weekday and Sunday Readership Seen Through Uses and Gratifications,” Newspaper Research Journal 6, pp. 20–32

23.

Towers

W. M.

(1986). “Uses and Gratifications of Magazine Readers: A Cross-Media Comparison,” Mass Comm Review, pp. 44–51

24.

Triandis

H. C.

(1988). “Collectivism vs. Individualism: A Reconceptualization of a Basic Concept in Cross-Cultural Psychology,” pp. 60–95. in Verma

Bagley

(eds), Cross-Cultural Studies of Personality, Attitudes and Cognition. London: Macmillian

A Cross-National Study of Newspaper Reading Patterns in the United States and Korea: An Analysis Based on the Uses and Gratifications Construct

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References