ASEAN,COVID-19 and Myanmar crisis: Dealing with critical juncture

Abstract

Explaining how international institutions develop is the significant contribution of historical institutionalism (HI) to the study of contemporary world politics. HI offers two important concepts, critical juncture and path dependence, demonstrating dynamics within the institution, leading towards continuity and change. The case of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) during the COVID-19 pandemic and the Myanmar democratic crisis tells us about the impact of the crucial moments on the regional organisation and its responses. Yet, ASEAN is resistant to change. What makes it possible is the question that cannot be answered by using the HI approach. Hence, we explain by employing a theoretical framework founded upon the link between diplomatic culture and institutional legitimacy, adopted from the English School (ES) theory of International Relations (IR). This article argues that ASEAN's diplomatic culture ensures member countrie’s compliance with the Association's code of conduct and prevents external power intrusion into Southeast Asian affairs and interests. Therefore, ASEAN's institutional legitimacy can be maintained. The Association deals with the critical juncture without undertaking any fundamental change.

Keywords

ASEAN critical juncture COVID-19 Myanmar crisis diplomatic culture institutional legitimacy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AAPPB (2021) Torture to Death in Detention. Available at https://aappb.org/?p=15746 (accessed 18 August 2021).

ADB (2022) COVID-19 Pushed 4.7 Million More People in Southeast Asia into Extreme Poverty in 2021, but Countries are Well Positioned to Bounce Back — ADB 16 March. Available at https://www.adb.org/news/covid-19-pushed-4-7-million-more-people-southeast-asia-extreme-poverty-2021-countries-are-well (accessed 3 December 2022).

Allard

(2021) ASEAN Appoints Brunei Diplomat as Envoy to Myanmar. Reuters, 4 August Available at https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/asean-appoints-bruneis-erywan-yusof-envoy-myanmar-sources-2021-08-04/ (accessed 7 September 2021).

Amador

(2021) The Continuing Erosion of ASEAN Centrality. ASEAN Focus 36. Singapore: ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.

Amaya

De Lombaerde

(2021) Regional cooperation is essential to combating health emergencies in the Global South. Globalization and Health 17(9): 2–6.

ASEAN (2021) Close to USD 8 Million in Pledges Raised to Support ASEAN’s Humanitarian Assistance in Myanmar. 18 August. Available at https://asean.org/close-to-usd8-million-in-pledges-raised-to-support-aseans-humanitarian-assistance-in-myanmar/ (accessed 7 August 2021).

ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (2022) Malaysian Foreign Minister and international parliamentarians demand stronger action on Myanmar 19 September. Available at https://aseanmp.org/2022/09/19/malaysian-foreign-minister-and-international-parliamentarians-demand-stronger-action-on-myanmar/ (accessed 3 December 2022).

ASEAN Summit (2022) ASEAN Leaders’ Declaration on Mainstreaming Four Priority Areas of the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific Within ASEAN-Led Mechanisms. Phnom Penh: 40th ASEAN Summit.

ASEAN-China Summit (2021) Joint Statement of the ASEAN-China Special Summit to Commemorate the 30th Anniversary of ASEAN-China Dialogue Relations: Comprehensive Strategic Partnership for Peace, Security, Prosperity and Sustainable Development. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.

10.

ASEAN-United States Summit (2019) Chairman’s Statement of the 7th ASEAN-United States Summit. Bangkok: 7th ASEAN-United States Summit.

11.

ASEAN-United States Summit (2021) Chairman’s Statement of the 9th ASEAN-United States Summit. Brunei Darussalam: 9th ASEAN-United States Summit.

12.

(2013) The association of Southeast Asian nations: Between internal and external legitimacy. In: Zaum

(ed) Legitimating International Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 132–161.

13.

Beech

(2021) Myanmar Coup puts the Seal on Autocracy’s Rise in Southeast New York Times, 12 April. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/12/world/asia/myanmar-coup-autocracy-democracy.html (accessed 7 September 2021).

14.

Bukovansky

(2002) Legitimacy and Power Politics: The American and French Revolutions in International Political Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

15.

Bull

(1977) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics., Fourth Edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

16.

Capoccia

(2015) Critical junctures and institutional change. In: Mahoney

Thelen

(eds) Advances in Comparative Historical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 147–179.

17.

Capoccia

Kelemen

(2007) The study of critical junctures: Theory, narrative and counterfactuals in institutional theory. World Politics 59(3): 341–369.

18.

Charter of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (2007).

19.

Clark

(2003) Legitimacy in global order. Review of International Studies 29: 75–95.

20.

Cook

ADB

(2010) Positions of responsibility: A comparison of ASEAN and EU approaches towards Myanmar. International Politics 47(3–4): 433–449.

21.

Croissant

Haynes

(2021) Democratic regression in Asia: Introduction. Democratisation 28(2): 1–21.

22.

David

(2007) Path dependence: A foundational concept for historical social science. Cliometrica 1(2): 91–114.

23.

Dellmuth

Jan

Jonas

(2019) Institutional sources of legitimacy for international organisations: Beyond procedure versus performance. Review of International Studies 45(4): 627–646.

24.

Emmers

(2017) Enduring mistrust and conflict management in Southeast Asia: An assessment of ASEAN as a security community. TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia 5(1): 75–97.

25.

Enos

(2021) ASEAN’S Response to Myanmar Coup is Failing The Heritage Foundation, 23 July. Available at https://www.heritage.org/asia/commentary/aseans-response-myanmar-coup-failing (accessed 7 September 2021).

26.

Eubank

(2021) Interview: ‘I Haven't Seen Airstrikes in Karen State For Over 20 Years. RFA Available at https://www.rfa.org/english/news/myanmar/rangers-03312021191818.html (accessed 18 Augustus 2021).

27.

Haacke

(2003a) ASEAN’s Diplomatic and Security Culture: Origins, Development and Prospects. London: Routledge.

28.

Haacke

(2003b) ASEAN’s diplomatic and security culture: A constructivist assessment. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 3(1): 57–87.

29.

Haacke

(2005) Enhanced interaction with Myanmar and the project of a security community: Is ASEAN refining or breaking with its diplomats and security culture? Contemporary Southeast Asia 27(2): 188–216.

30.

Hanung

Judhistari

(2021) One Vision, Different Responses: An Analysis of ASEAN Member States’ Responses to the Myanmar Coup and Recommendations. Policy Brief. Bangkok: FORUM-ASIA.

31.

Harding

Tower

(2021) Myanmar Coup Weakens Southeast Asia Security and Cooperation. USIP. Available at https://www.usip.org/publications/2021/04/myanmar-coup-weakens-southeast-asia-security-and-cooperation (accessed 18 Augustus 2021).

32.

Heydarian

(2021) Myanmar Coup Reveals Urgent Need for ASEAN Overhaul. Nikkei Asia. Available at https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/Myanmar-coup-reveals-urgent-need-for-ASEAN-overhaul (accessed 21 August 2021).

33.

Hiebert

(2020) COVID-19 Threatens Democracy in Southeast Asia. East Asia Forum Available at https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2020/05/25/covid-19-threatens-democracy-in-southeast-asia/ (accessed 21 August 2021).

34.

Honna

(2020) Military politics in pandemic Indonesia. The Asia-Pacific Journal 18(5): 1–9.

35.

Human Rights Watch (2022) ASEAN: Act to Stop Myanmar Military Abuses. 1 November. Available at https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/11/01/asean-act-stop-myanmar-military-abuses (accessed 3 December 2022).

36.

Hurd

(1999) Legitimacy and authority in international politics. International Organization 53(2): 379–408.

37.

Justice for Myanmar (2022) ASEAN’s Complicity in the Myanmar Military’s Atrocity Crime. 10 May. Available at https://www.justiceformyanmar.org/stories/aseans-complicity-in-the-myanmar-militarys-atrocity-crimes (accessed 3 December 2022).

38.

Katanyuu

(2006) Beyond non-interference in ASEAN: The association's role in Myanmar's national reconciliation and democratisation. Asian Survey 46(6): 825–845.

39.

Kurlantzick

(2021) Myanmar’s Coup Emblematic of Regional Democracy Failures. Council of Foreign Relations. Available at https://www.cfr.org/blog/myanmars-coup-emblematic-regional-democracy-failures (accessed 21 August 2021).

40.

Mahoney

(2001) Path dependent explanations of regime change: Central America in comparative perspective. Studies in Comparative International Development 36(1): 111–141.

41.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia (2020) 21st ASEAN Plus Three Foreign MInisters’ Meeting via Video Conference, 9 September 2020. Available at https://kemlu.go.id/portal/en/read/1668/berita/21st-asean-plus-three-foreign-ministers-meeting-via-video-conference-9-september-2020 (accessed 3 December 2022).

42.

Muhibat

(2021) Embracing Change to Stay Resilient. ASEAN Focus 36. Singapore: ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.

43.

Narine

(2006) The English school and ASEAN. The Pacific Review 19(2): 199–218.

44.

Paulsen

(2021) ASEAN must Facilitate Myanmar’s Return to Democracy. The Jakarta Post, 20 February. Available at https://www.thejakartapostcom/academia/2021/02/19/asean-must-facilitate-myanmars-return-to-democracy.html (accessed 7 September 2021).

45.

Pradhan

(2008) Struggle for democracy in Myanmar: Response of neighbours, United States and ASEAN. Jadavpur Journal of International Relations 11–12(1): 228–241.

46.

Quayle

(2013) Southeast Asia and the English School of International Relations: A Region-Theory Dialogue. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

47.

Renshaw

(2013) Democratic transformation and regional institutions: The case of Myanmar and ASEAN. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 32(1): 29–54.

48.

Rixen

Viola

(2015) Putting path dependence in its place: Toward a taxonomy of institutional change. Journal of Theoretical Politics 27(2): 301–323.

49.

Rixen

Viola

Zürn

(2016) Historical Institutionalism and International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

50.

Rosyidin

Dir

AAB

(2021) Why states do not impose sanctions: Regional norms and Indonesia’s diplomatic approach towards Myanmar on the Rohingya issue. International Politics 58(5): 738–756.

51.

Ruland

(2021) COVID-19 and ASEAN: Strengthening state-centrism, eroding inclusiveness, testing cohesion. Italian Journal of International Affairs 56(2): 72–92.

52.

Sharp

(2004) The idea of diplomatic culture and its sources. In: Slavik

(ed) Intercultural Communication and Diplomacy. Geneva: Diplofoundation, pp. 361–379.

53.

Sharp

(2009) Diplomatic Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. London: SAGE.

54.

Suchman

(1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review 20(3): 571–610.

55.

The ASEAN Declaration (Bangkok Declaration) (1967).

56.

The Jakarta Post (2021) ASEAN Deadlocked in Selection of Special Envoy to Myanmar, 6 July. Available at https://www.thejakartapostcom/seasia/2021/07/06/asean-deadlocked-in-selection-of-special-envoy-to-myanmar.html (accessed 7 September, 2021).

57.

Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia (1976).

58.

UNDP/United Nations Development Program (2021) COVID-19, Coup d'Etat and Poverty: Compounding Negative Shocks and Their Impact on Human Development in Myanmar UNDP Report. Available at https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/UNDP-RBAP-COVID-19-Coup-d-Etat-and-Poverty-Impact-on-Myanmar-2021.pdf (accessed 20 August 2021).

59.

UNHCR (2022) Myanmar Situation. Available at https://reporting.unhcr.org/myanmarsituation (accessed 3 December 2022).

60.

Vatikiotis

(2006) Resolving Internal Conflicts in Southeast Asia: Domestic Challenges and Regional Perspectives. Contemporary Southeast Asia, pp. 27–47.

61.

WHO (2021) COVID-19, Myanmar Situation. Available at https://covid19.who.int/region/searo/country/mm (accessed 8 September 2021).

62.

Yoshimatsu

(2022) ASEAN and great power rivalry in regionalism: From East Asia to the Indo-Pacific. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs.

63.

Zone of Peace, Freedom and Neutrality Declaration (1971).