While formally a federation that vests significant powers in the sub-national bodies of government and leaves it for its federal units and municipalities to decide who will govern them by conducting elections, the Russian Federation is effectively a centralized authoritarian state. This paper uses evidence from the September 2017 sub-national elections in Russia to examine the role of formal political institutions in sustaining the country’s political regime. The analysis shows that the political domination of the pro-government party over the regional political assemblies is sustained by a complex combination of party regulations and electoral rules. In particular, gubernatorial elections are organized and conducted in a way that ensures the victories of the incumbent governors who are effectively appointed by the president of Russia.
BaderMVan HamC (2015) What explains regional variation in election fraud? Evidence from Russia: a research note. Post-Soviet Affairs31(6): 514–528.
2.
BahryD (2005) The new federalism and the paradoxes of regional sovereignty in Russia. Comparative Politics37(2): 127–146.
3.
BlakkisrudH (2011) Medvedev’s new governors. Europe-Asia Studies63(3): 367–395.
4.
BlakkisrudH (2015) Governing the governors: legitimacy vs control in the reform of the Russian regional executive. East European Politics31(1): 104–121.
5.
BunceV (1998) Subversive institutions: the end of the Soviet state in comparative perspective. Post-Soviet Affairs14(4): 323–354.
6.
BusyginaIFilippovMTaukebaevaE (2018) To decentralize or to continue on the centralization track: The cases of authoritarian regimes in Russia and Kazakhstan. Journal of Eurasian Studies9(1): 61–71.
7.
ChaistyP (2012) Members and leaders in Russian party organizations. East European Politics28(3): 283–297.
8.
DeBardelebenJZherebtsovM (2014) The reinstated gubernatorial elections in Russia: a return to open politics?REGION: Regional Studies of Russia Eastern Europe and Central Asia3(1): 3–36.
9.
DemchenkoOGolosovGV (2016) Federalism, gubernatorial power and the incorporation of subnational authoritarianism in Russia: a theory-testing empirical inquiry. Acta Politica51(1): 61–79.
10.
DickovickJT (2007) Municipalization as central government strategy: central-regional-local politics in Peru, Brazil, and South Africa. Publius: The Journal of Federalism37(1): 1–25.
11.
EpsteinDJ (2014) Ballot access, vlast’ dominance and pomoshchnik political culture in Russia’s subnational executive elections. REGION: Regional Studies of Russia Eastern Europe and Central Asia3(1): 83–123.
12.
FilippovMShvetsovaO (1999) Asymmetric bilateral bargaining in the new Russian Federation: a path-dependence explanation. Communist and Post-Communist Studies32(1): 61–76.
GandhiJLust-OkarE (2009) Elections under authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science12: 403–422.
15.
GandhiJPrzeworskiA (2007) Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats. Comparative Political Studies40(11): 1279–1301.
16.
Gel’manV (2004) The unrule of law in the making: the politics of informal institution building in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies56(7): 1021–1040.
17.
Gel’manV (2015) Political opposition in Russia: a troubled transformation. Europe-Asia Studies67(2): 177–191.
18.
Gel’manVRyzhenkovSBrieM (2003) Making and Breaking Democratic Transitions: The Comparative Politics of Russia’s Regions. Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
19.
Gel’manVRossC (eds) (2010) The Politics of Sub-National Authoritarianism in Russia. Burlington: Ashgate.
20.
GolosovGV (2006) The structure of party alternatives and voter choice in Russia: evidence from the 2003–2004 regional legislative elections. Party Politics12(6): 707–725.
GolosovGV (2011b) The regional roots of electoral authoritarianism in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies63(4): 93–110.
23.
GolosovG V (2012) The 2012 political reform in Russia: the interplay of liberalizing concessions and authoritarian corrections. Problems of Post-Communism59(6): 3–14.
24.
GolosovGV (2013a) Proportional representation and authoritarianism: evidence from Russia’s regional election law reform. Representation49(1): 83–95.
25.
GolosovGV (2013b) Machine politics: the concept and its implications for post-Soviet studies. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization21(4): 459–480.
26.
GolosovGV (2014) The last resort of political regionalism: electoral blocs in Russia’s regional legislative elections, 2003–2005. East European Politics30(1): 71–85.
27.
GolosovGV (2015a) Do spoilers make a difference? Instrumental manipulation of political parties in an electoral authoritarian regime, the case of Russia. East European Politics31(2): 170–186.
28.
GolosovGV (2015b) The idiosyncratic dynamics of party system nationalization in Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs31(5): 397–419.
29.
GolosovGVGushchinaKKononenkoP (2016) Russia’s local government in the process of authoritarian regime transformation: incentives for the survival of local democracy. Local Government Studies42(4): 507–526.
30.
GoodeJP (2007) The puzzle of Putin’s gubernatorial appointments. Europe-Asia Studies59(3): 365–399.
31.
GoodeJP (2013) The revival of Russia’s gubernatorial elections: liberalization or Potemkin reform?Russian Analytical Digest, no. 139: 9–11.
32.
GorenburgDP (2003) Minority Ethnic Mobilization in the Russian Federation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
HaleHE (2003) Explaining machine politics in Russia’s regions: economy, ethnicity and legacy. Post-Soviet Affairs19(3): 228–263.
34.
HaleHE (2004) The origins of United Russia and the Putin presidency: the role of contingency in party-system development. Demokratizatsiiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization12(2): 169–194.
35.
HaleH EColtonT (2010) Russians and the Putin-Medvedev ’tandemocracy’: a survey-based portrait of the 2007–2008 election season. Problems of Post-Communism57 (2): 3–20.
36.
KahnJ (2000) The parade of sovereignties: establishing the vocabulary of the new Russian federalism. Post-Soviet Affairs16(1): 58–89.
37.
KahnJTrochevABalayanN (2009) The unification of law in the Russian Federation. Post-Soviet Affairs25(4): 310–346.
MagaloniBKricheliR (2010) Political order and one-party rule. Annual Review of Political Science13: 123–143.
40.
MarchL (2009) Managing opposition in a hybrid regime: Just Russia and parastatal opposition. Slavic Review68(3): 504–527.
41.
MatsuzatoK (2001) From ethno-Bonapartism to centralized caciquismo: characteristics and origins of the Tatarstan political regime, 1900–2000. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics17(4): 43–77.
MoraskiBJReisingerWM (2007) Eroding democracy: federal intervention in Russia’s gubernatorial elections. Democratization14(4): 603–621.
46.
MyagkovMOrdeshookPC (2001) The trail of votes in Russia’s 1999 Duma and 2000 presidential elections. Communist and Post-Communist Studies34(3): 353–370.
47.
PanovP (2016) How do governors build a power vertical in the context of mayoral elections?Russian Politics1(3): 252–268.
48.
PanovPRossC (2013) Sub-national elections in Russia: variations in United Russia’s domination of regional assemblies. Europe-Asia Studies65(4): 737–752.
49.
PetrovNLipmanMHaleHE (2014) Three dilemmas of hybrid regime governance: Russia from Putin to Putin. Post-Soviet Affairs30(1): 1–26.
50.
ReddawayPOrttungRW (eds) (2004) The Dynamics of Russian Politics: Putin’s Reform of Federal-Regional Relations. Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
51.
ReisingerWMMoraskiBJ (2017) The Regional Roots of Russia’s Political Regime. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
52.
ReuterOJ (2013) Regional patrons and hegemonic party electoral performance in Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs29(2): 101–135.
53.
ReuterOJRobertsonGB (2012) Subnational appointments in authoritarian regimes: evidence from Russian gubernatorial Appointments. Journal of Politics74(4): 1023–1037.
54.
RossC (2005) Federalism and electoral authoritarianism under Putin. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization13(3): 347–371.
55.
RossC (2007) Municipal reform in the Russian Federation and Putin’s ‘electoral vertical’. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization15(2): 191–208.
SharafutdinovaG (2010) Subnational governance in Russia: how Putin changed the contract with his agents and the problems it created for Medvedev. Publius: The Journal of Federalism40(4): 672–696.
58.
SharafutdinovaG (2015) Elite management in electoral authoritarian regimes: a view from Bashkortostan and Tatarstan. Central Asian Affairs2(2): 117–139.
59.
SmythRLowryAWilkeningB (2007) Engineering victory: institutional reform, informal institutions and the formation of a hegemonic party regime in the Russian Federation. Post-Soviet Affairs23 (2): 118–137.
60.
SolnickSL (1998) Gubernatorial elections in Russia, 1996–1997. Post-Soviet Affairs14(1): 48–80.
61.
Stoner-WeissK (1997) Local Heroes: The Political Economy of Russian Regional Governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
62.
WhiteAC (2015) How ethnicity matters in Russian elections: ethnic minorities and support for the United Russia party. Eurasian Geography and Economics56(5): 524–546.
63.
WollmannHGritsenkoE (2009) Local self-government in Russia: between de-centralisation and re-centralisation. In: RossCCampbellA (eds) Federalism and Local Politics in Russia. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 227–248.
64.
ZavadskayaM (2018) The fight for turnout: growing personalism in the Russian presidential elections of 2018. Russian Analytical Digest217: 2–4.
