This study examines the effects of viewing televised debates on political engagement. Voters consume information while viewing television debates, which can affect political engagement in a positive manner. Examining the effects of debates on political engagement, we analyze panel survey data from the 2012 Korean presidential election. According to the results, voters who view more televised debates are more likely to search for information and discuss political issues with others. The results provide evidence that viewing televised debates tends to enhance civic engagement.
BeaudoinCEThorsonE (2004) Social capital in rural and urban communities: Testing differences in media effects and models. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly81(2): 378–399.
2.
BergerB (2009) Political theory, political science, and the end of civic engagement. Perspectives on Politics7(2): 335–350.
3.
CappellaJJamiesonKH (1996) News frames, political cynicism, and media cynicism. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science546(1): 71–85.
4.
ChaffeeSH (1978) Presidential debates – Are they helpful to voters?Communication Monographs45(4): 330–346.
5.
DrewDWeaverD (1998) Voter learning in the 1996 presidential election: Did the media matter?Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly75(2): 292–301.
6.
Dutta-BergmanMJ (2005) Access to the internet in the context of community participation and community satisfaction. New Media & Society7(1): 89–109.
7.
FlemingKThorsonEPengZ (2005) Associational membership as a source of social capital: its links to use of local newspaper, interpersonal communication, entertainment media, and volunteering. Mass Communication and Society8(3): 219–240.
8.
FranklinM (2004) Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
9.
HanJTLeeJMChoJM (2013) An Analysis of the Effects of Televised Presidential Debates in the 18th Presidential Election in Korea. Korean Party Studies Review12(2): 37–72 [In Korean.]
10.
KimS (2000) The Politics of Democratization in Korea: The Role of Civil Society. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
11.
KimSHHanM (2005) Media use and participatory democracy in South Korea. Mass Communication & Society8(2): 133–153.
12.
KimSH (2007) Media use, social capital, and civic participation in South Korea. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly84(3): 477–494.
13.
KimJY (2005) “Bowling together” isn’t a cure-all: The relationship between social capital and political trust in South Korea. International Political Science Review26(2): 193–213.
14.
KrishnaA (2002) Enhancing political participation in democracies: What is the role of social capital?Comparative Political Studies35(4): 437–460.
15.
LeeAR (2010) The quality of social capital and political participation in South Korea. Journal of East Asian Studies10(3): 483–505.
16.
LeeGCappellaJSouthwellB (2003) The effects of news and entertainment on interpersonal trust: Political talk radio, newspapers, and television. Mass Communication and Society6(4): 413–434.
17.
LeeHLeeJ (2015) Televised presidential debates and learning in the 2012 Korean presidential election: Does political knowledge condition information acquisition?International Journal of Communication9(20): 2693–2712.
18.
LemertJB (1993) Do televised presidential debates help inform voters?Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media37(1): 83–94.
19.
LijphartA (1997) Unequal participation: Democracy’s unresolved dilemma. The American Political Science Review91(1): 1–14.
20.
LongJS (1997) Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
21.
MaurerMReinemannC (2006) Learning versus knowing effects of misinformation in televised debates. Communication Research33(6): 489–506.
22.
McKinneyMSRillLAThorsonE (2014) Civic engagement through presidential debates: Young citizen’s political attitudes in the 2012 election. American Behavioral Scientist58(6): 755–775.
23.
McKinneyMSWarnerBR (2013) To unite and divide: The polarizing effect of presidential debates. Communication Studies64(5): 508–527.
24.
McLeodJMcDonaldD (1985) Beyond simple exposure: Media orientations and their impact on political processes. Communication Research12(3): 3–34.
25.
McLeodJScheuflelDMoyP (1999) Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication16(3): 315–336.
26.
MoyPScheufeleDHolbertR. (1999) Television use and social capital: Testing Putnam’s time displacement hypothesis. Mass Communication and Society2(1–2): 27–45.
27.
MoyPScheufeleD (2000). Media effects on political and social trust. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly77(4): 744–759.
28.
NewtonK (2007) Social and political trust. In: DaltonRKlingemannH-D (eds) Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp.342–361.
29.
NorrisP (1996) Does television erode social capital? A reply to Putnam. PS: Political Science and Politics29: 474–480.
30.
ParkCW (2005) Patterns and determinants of political participation among Korean citizens: An analysis of the 2004 General Social Survey Data. Journal of Korean Politics14(1): 147–192. [In Korean.]
31.
PattersonT (2002) The vanishing voter: Why are the voting booths so empty?National Civic Review91(4): 367–378.
TeixeiraRA (2011) The Disappearing American Voter. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
42.
VerbaSSchlozmanKLBradyHE (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
WaldKLupferM (1978) The presidential debate as a civics lesson. Public Opinion Quarterly42(3): 342–353.
44.
WeaverDDrewD (1995) Voter learning in the 1992 presidential election: Did the “nontraditional” media and debates matter?Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly72(1): 7–17.
45.
WeaverDDrewD (2001) Voter learning and interest in the 2000 presidential election: Did the media matter?Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly78(4): 787–798.
