India’s rapid economic growth over the last decade has been coupled with a Maoist insurgency that competes with the state for rural allegiance. In response to the threat, the Government of India has securitized development, using public works programmes in an attempt to sway locals away from Maoist allegiance. However, these areas are also home to massive iron and coal mines that drive India’s growth. This study aims to address the lack of local-level analysis and the lack of a robust dataset by merging qualitative fieldwork with disparate district-level conflict data sources to explore different potential explanatory variables for the Maoist insurgency, including the relationship between development works, violence, and natural resource extraction. We find that while effective implementation of development programmes is loosely related to the immediate suppression of violent activities in Maoist-affected districts, and under certain conditions mining activity increases the likelihood for conflict, it is the presence of scheduled caste and tribal communities that is the best predictor of violence.
Arellano-YanguasJ (2011) Aggravating the resource curse: Decentralisation, mining and conflict in Peru. Journal of Development Studies47(4): 617–638.
2.
BahreeM (2010) The forever war: Inside India’s Maoist conflict. World Policy Journal27(2): 83–89.
3.
BanerjeeAIyerLSomanathanR (2005) History, social divisions and public goods in rural India. Journal of the European Economic Association3(2–3): 639–647.
4.
BanerjeeK (2010) Social Development Report 2010. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
BeckNKatzJN (1995) What to do (and not to do) with Time-Series Cross-Section data. American Political Science Review89(3): 634–647.
7.
BermanEShapiroJFelterJ (2011) Can hearts and minds be bought? The economics of counterinsurgency in Iraq. Journal of Political Economy119(4): 766–819.
8.
le BillonP (2001) The political ecology of war: natural resources and armed conflicts. Political Geography20: 561–584.
9.
le BillonP (2004) The geopolitical economy of ‘resource wars’. Geopolitics9(1): 1–28.
10.
le BillonP (2008) Diamond wars? Conflict diamonds and geographies of resource wars. Annals of the Association of American Geographers98(2): 345–372.
11.
BlattmanCMiguelM (2010) Civil war. NBER Working Paper 14801.
12.
BoharaAKMitchellNJNepalM (2006) Opportunity, democracy and political violence: A sub-national analysis of conflict in Nepal. Journal of Conflict Resolution50(1): 108–128.
13.
BorooahV (2008) Deprivation, violence, and conflict: An analysis of ‘Naxalite’ activity in the districts of India. International Journal of Conflict and Violence2(2): 317–333.
14.
BosworthBCollinsSVirmaniA (2006) Sources of Growth in the Indian Economy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
15.
Brandt PatrickTWilliamsJTFordhamBOPollinsB (2000) Dynamic models for persistent event count time series. American Journal of Political Science44(4): 823–843.
16.
BrunnschweilerCNBulteEH (2009) Natural resources and violent conflict: Resource abundance, dependence and the onset of civil wars. Oxford Economic Papers61(4): 651–674.
17.
CameronATrivediP (1998) Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
CollierPHoefflerA (1998) On economic causes of civil war. Oxford Economic Papers50(4): 563–573.
19.
CollierPHoefflerA (2004) Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers56(4): 536–595.
20.
CollierPHoefflerARohnerD (2009) Beyond the greed and grievance debate: Feasibility and civil war. Oxford Economic Papers61: 1–27.
21.
DoQTIyerL (2007) Poverty, Social Divisions, and Conflict in Nepal. HBS Finance Working Paper 07-065. Harvard, MA: Harvard Business School.
22.
DuffieldM (1998) Post-modern conflict: Warlords, post-adjustment states and private protection. Civil Wars1(1): 65–102.
23.
FearonJ (2004) Why do some civil wars last so much longer than others?Journal of Peace Research41(3): 275–302.
24.
FearonJLaitinD (2003) Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review97(1): 75–90.
25.
GomesJF (2011) The political economy of the maoist conflict in India: An empirical analysis. Working paper. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain.
26.
Government of India (2010) Ministry of Mines. Available at: www.mines.nic.in/ (accessed 20 September 2011).
27.
Government of India (2011) Approach to the 12th 5 Year Plan.
28.
Government of India, Ministry of Rural Development (2010) NREGA Annual Reports 2004–2010. Available at: www.nrega.nic.in/ (accessed 20 September, 2011).
29.
Government of India, Registrar General and Census Commissioner (2001) Census Data, 2001. Available at: http://www.censusindia.net/ (accessed 15 March 2011).
30.
GreenL (1994) Fear as a way of life. Cultural Anthropology9(2): 227–256.
31.
HegreHØstbyGRaleighC (2009) Poverty and civil war events: A disaggregated study of Liberia. Journal of Conflict Resolution53(4): 598–623.
32.
HibbardMLaneMBRasmussenK (2008) The split personality of planning indigenous peoples and planning for land and resource management. Journal of Planning Literature23(2): 136–151.
33.
Homer-DixonT (1999) Environment, Scarcity and Violence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
Homer-DixonTBlittJ (1998) Ecoviolence: Links among Environment, Population and Security. Lanham, MD: Rowman Littlefield.
35.
Human Rights Watch (2008) Being Neutral is Our Biggest Crime. New York: Human Rights Watch Publications.
36.
HumphreysMWeinsteinJ (2008) Who fights? The determinants of participation in civil war. American Journal of Political Science52(2): 436–455.
37.
IyerL (2009) The bloody millennium: Internal conflict in South Asia. Harvard BGIE Working Paper 09-086.
38.
IyerL (2010) Direct versus indirect colonial rule in India: Long-term consequences. The Review of Economics and Statistics92(4): 693–713.
39.
KalyvasSN (2006) The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
KeenD (2008) Complex Emergencies. London: Polity.
41.
KingG (1988) Statistical models for political science event counts: Bias in conventional procedures and evidence for the exponential Poisson regression model. American Journal of Political Science32(3): 838–863.
42.
KolåsÅMiklianJ (2009). Intractable India: Revisiting Indian conflict management strategies. Journal of Conflict Management and Development3(3): 1–17.
43.
LawlessJ (1987) Negative binomial and mixed Poisson regression. The Canadian Journal of Statistics15(3): 209–225.
44.
LujalaP (2010) The spoils of nature: Armed civil conflict and rebel access to natural resources. Journal of Peace Research47(1): 15–28.
45.
MiklianJ (2009) The purification hunt: The Salwa Judum counterinsurgency. Dialectical Anthropology33(3–4): 441–459.
46.
MiklianJ (2011) Revolutionary conflict in federations. Conflict Security and Development11(1): 25–53.
47.
MiklianJ (2012) The political ecology of war in Maoist India. Politics, Religion and Ideologyin press.
Ministry of Home Affairs (2010) Annual Report 2010. Available from: www.mha.nic.in/
50.
National Counter Terrorism Center, Worldwide Incident Tracking System (2010). Data available from: www.nctc.gov/site/other/wits.html
51.
NavlakhaG (2010) Days and nights in the Maoist heartland. Economic and Political Weekly35(16): 38–47.
52.
Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (2010) Multidimensional Poverty Index. Oxford: Oxford University/UNDP Press.
53.
People’s March (2010) Whose development is it anyway?People’s March11(5): 27–34.
54.
People’s Union for Civil Liberties (2006) Where the State Makes War on Its Own People. New Delhi: PUCL.
55.
PiazzaJ (2010) Terrorism and party systems in the states of India. Security Studies19(1): 99–123.
56.
Planning Commission of India (2001) Development Challenges in Extremist Affected Areas. New Delhi: Planning Commission of India
57.
PoddarTYiE (2007) India’s Rising Growth Potential. Global Economics Paper no. 152. Washington, DC: Goldman Sachs Economic Research.
58.
ReganPMNortonD (2005) Greed, grievance, and mobilization in civil wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution49(3): 319–336.
59.
RemøeK (2010) Grievance, greed and feasibility in internal conflict: What explains the Naxalite insurgency in India?MSc thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway.
60.
RossM (2004a) How do natural resources influence civil war? Evidence from thirteen cases. International Organization58: 35–67.
61.
RossM (2004b) What do we know about natural resources and civil war?Journal of Peace Research41(3): 337–356.
62.
RukareD (2006) Access to justice and the rule of law. Report presented at National Consultation Conference, Legal Empowerment of the Poor, Kampala.
63.
SawyerSGomezET (2008) Transnational governmentality and resource extraction. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development: Identities, Conflict and Cohesion Paper 13.
64.
ShahA (2011) India burning: The Maoist revolution. In: Clark-DeedsI (ed.) A Companion to the Anthropology of India. Oxford: Blackwell.
65.
ShahAPettigrewJ (2009) Windows into a revolution: Ethnographies of Maoism in South Asia. Dialectical Anthropology33(3): 225–251.
66.
South Asian Terrorism Portal (2011) 2004–2010 Maoist Activity. Data available from: www.satp.com/ (accessed 15 September 2011).
67.
de SoysaI (2002) Paradise is a bazaar? Greed, creed, and governance in civil war 1989–99. Journal of Peace Research39(4): 395–416.
68.
de SoysaIBinningsbøH (2009) Devil’s excrement or social cement? Oil wealth and repression, 1980–2004. International Social Science Journal57(1): 21–32.
69.
SuykensB (2010) Maoist martyrs: Remembering the revolution and its heroes in Naxalite propaganda. Terrorism and Political Violence22: 378–393.
70.
UrdalH (2008) Population, resources and violent conflicts: A sub-national study of India 1956–2002. Journal of Conflict Resolution52(4): 590–617.
71.
VadlamannatiKC (2012) A race to compete for investments among Indian states? An empirical investigation. Unpublished Manuscript: Heidelberg.
72.
VermaS (2011) Far-Reaching Consequences of the Naxalite Problem in India. New Delhi: Rakshak Foundation Report.
73.
WeinsteinJ (2008) Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74.
WhitemanG (2009) All my relations: Understanding perceptions of justice and conflict between companies and indigenous peoples. Organization Studies30(1): 101–120.
