It seems that corporatism has appeared as one major form of response to crises such as the world-wide depression of the early 1970s. This corporatist model is characterized by well organized centralized economic interest groups interacting under governments guidance in which they, as functional representatives, take part in decision-making involving the major interrelated issues of modern political economy. However, in the British system, the corporatism was in fact never a complete system. Indeed, it was always disrupted by shifts in policy as a result of the adversary mood of the parties and of Parliament. Not only did one side of the House of Commons prefer one corner of the triangle, and the other side the other corner, but their entire attitude to the new harmony differed. For example, Labor had a natural inclination to try and control prices, whereas Conservatives tended to hold down wages.
AlvaresM. R.“Government Participation, Labor Organization, and Macroeconomic Performance”, American Political Science Review, vol. 85, (1991), 539–556
2.
BeerSamuel H., British Politics in the Collectivist Age, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1965
3.
BeerSamuel H., Britain Against Itself: The Political Contradictions of Collectivism, New York: W. W. Norton & CO, 1982
4.
BergerSuzanne D. ed., Organizing Interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, Corporatism, and the Transformation of Politics, Cambridge University Press, 1981
5.
BankStephen, Industry and Government in Britain: The Federation of British Industries in Politics, 1945–65, Wermead: Saxon House, 1973
6.
BrownWilliam ed., The Changing Contours of British Industrial Relations, Oxford: Basil Blackwell1981
7.
BoothAlan, “Corporatism, Capitalism and Depression in Twentieth-Century Britain,”The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 33No. 2 (June 1982), 200–223
8.
DahrendorfRalf, On Britain, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1982
9.
DiamantAlfred, “Bureaucracy and Public Policy in Neocorporatist Settings,”Comparative Politics, October 1981, pp. 101–124
10.
DoreRonald, British Factory Japanese Factory: The Origins of National Diversity in Industrial Relations, Berkeley: University of California, 1973
11.
DouglasJames, “Review Article: The Overloaded Crown”British Journal of Political Science, vol. 6, (1976), 483–505
12.
GrantWynWilksStephen, “British Industrial Policy: Structural Change, Policy Inertia,”Journal of Public Policy, vol. 3Part 1, (February 1983), 13–28
13.
Gustafsson, Gunnel and Jeremy Richardson, “Post-Industrial Changes in Policy Style,”Scandinavian Political Studies, vol.3, No. 1, (1980), 21–37
14.
HareP.G.KirbyM.W., ed., An Introduction to British Economic Policy, Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books1984.
15.
HarrisonReginald J., Pluralism and Corporatism: The Political Evolution of Modern Democracies, London: George Allen & Unwin, 1980
16.
KingdomJohn, Government and Politics in Britain, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991
17.
LaneJan-ErikErssonSvante, Politics and Society in Western Europe, 4th edition, London: Sage, 1999
18.
LehmbruchGerhard, “Consociational Democracy, Class Conflict and the New Corporatism” in SchmitterLehmbruch ed., Trends Towards Corporatist Intermediation, London: Sage1979, 53–62
19.
LehmbruchGerhard, “Liberal Corporatism and Party Government,” in Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation, London: Sage1979, 147–184
20.
LehmbruchGerhard, “Neo-Corporatism in Comparative Perspective,” in LehmbruchSchmitter ed., Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making, London: Sage1982, 1–28
21.
LehmbruchGerhardSchmitterPhilippe C., ed., Patterns of Corporatist Policy Making, London: Sage1982.
22.
LevyColin, Politics in Britain: An Introduction, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1983
23.
LijphartA.CrepasM. M. L., “Corporatism and Consensus Democracy in 18 Countries”British Journal of Political Science, vol. 21, (1991), 235–256
24.
MayerLawrence C.BurnettJohn H., Politics in Industrial Societies: A Comparative Perspective, New York: John Wiley & Son, 1977
25.
MacmillanHarold, The Middle Way, London, Macmillan, 1938, 1966
26.
PooleMichaelBrownWilliamRuberyJillSissonKeityTarlingRogerWilkinsonFrank, Industrial Relations in the Future: Trends and Possibilities in Britain over the Next Decade, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984
27.
MiddlemasKeity, Politics in Industrial Society: The Experience of the British System since 1911, London: Andre Deutsch, 1979
28.
MiddlemasKeity, Industry, Unions and government: Twenty-One Years of NEDC, London: Macmillan, 1983
29.
O'DonellG.A., “Corporatism and the Question of the State,” in MalloyJ.M. ed., Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press1977
30.
OffeClaus, “The Attribution of Public Status to Interest Groups: Observations on the West German Case,” in BergerSuzane D. ed., Organizing Interests in West Europe: Pluralism, Corporatism, and the Transformation of Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1981, 123–158
31.
PanitchLeo, Social Democracy and Industrial Militancy: The Labor Party, the Trade Unions and Incomes Policy, 1945–1974, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976
32.
PanitchLeo, “The Development of Corporatism in Liberal Democracies,” in SchmitterLehmbruch ed., Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation, London: Sage1979, 119–146
33.
PanitchLeo, “Recent Theorization of Corporatism: Reflections on a Growth Industry,”British Journal of Sociologyvol. 31No. 2 (June 1980), 159–187
34.
PempelT.J.TsunekawaKeiichi“Corporatism Without Labor?: The Japanese Anomaly,” in SchmitterLehmbruch ed., Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation, London: Sage1979, 231–270
35.
PikeRichard B.StritchThomas ed., The New Corporatism: Social-Political Structures in the Iberian World, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press1974.
36.
PooleMichael, “Some Problems of Method and Operational Techniques in the Study of Corporatism,”European Journal of Politics Research, vol. 10, (1982), 255–263
37.
RoseRichard, Politics in England: An Interpretation for the 1980s, London: Faber & Faber, 1965, 1974, 1980
38.
SacksPaul M., “State Structure and the Asymmetrical Society: An Approach to Public Policy in Britain,”Comparative Politics, (April 1980), 349–376
39.
SalisburyRobert H., “Why No Corporatism in America?” in SchmitterLehmbruch ed., Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation, London: Sage1979, 213–230
40.
ScaseRichard ed., Industrial Society: Class, Cleavage and Control, New York: St. Martin's Press1977
41.
SchmidtManfred G., “Does Corporatism Matter? Economic Crisis, Politics and Rates of Unemployment in Capitalist Democracies in the 1970s,” in LehmbruchSchmitter ed., Patterns of Corporatist Policy Making, London: Sage1982, 237–358
42.
SchmitterPhilippe C., “Still the Century of Corporatism?” in SchmitterLehmbruch ed., Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation, London: Sage1979, 7–52
43.
SchmitterPhilippe C., “Modes of Interest Intermediation and Models of Societal Change in Western Europe,” in SchmitterLehmbruch ed., Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation, London: Sage1979, 63–94
44.
SchmitterPhilippe C., “Interest Intermediation and Regime Governability in Contemporary Western Europe and North America,” in BergerSuzane D. ed., Organizing Interests in Western Europe, Pluralism, Corporatism, and the Transformation of Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1981, 287–330
45.
SchmitterPhilippe C., “Corporatism is dead! Long live corporatism! Reflections on Andrew Schonfield's “Modern Capitalism””, Government and Opposition, vol. 24, (1989), 54–73
46.
SchmitterP.C.LehmbruchGerhard ed., Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation, London: Oxford University Press1979.
47.
SchmitterP.C.GroteJ. R., The Corporatist Sisyphus: Past, Present and Future, Florence: EUI Working Papers, SPS No. 97/4, 1997
48.
ShonfieldAndrew, Modern Capitalism: The Changing Balance of Public and Private Power, London: Oxford University Press, 1965
49.
StreeckW., Social Institutions and Economic Performance, London: Sage, 1992
50.
WassenbergArthur F.P., “Neo-Corporatism and the Quest for Control: The Cuckoo Game,” in LehmbruchSchmitter ed., Patterns of Corporatist Policy Making, London: Sage1982, 83–108
51.
WilenskyHarold L., The “New Corporatism”, Centralization, and the Welfare State, London: Sage, 1976
52.
WilsonFrank L., “Interest Groups and Politics in Western Europe: The Neo-Corporatist Approach,”Comparative Politics, October 1983, pp.105–123
WinklerJ.T., “The Corporatist Economy: Theory and Administration,” in ScaseRichard, ed., Industrial Society: Class, Cleavage and Control, New York, St. Martin's Press, 1977, 43–58
