The Eurasian vector, have been actively conducted by the Putin's government. With the axis of Moscow, Beijing and Delhi, these three countries seek not only to block the eastward policy of ‘global NATO’ but ultimately shift from ‘one-polar’ system with USA as the central figure to ‘multi-polar’ one. So doing, they intend to consolidate the ‘democratization of the international order’ against the US-led ‘enlargement of democracy’. Entering the 21st century, the new normative political context constructed in Eurasia is characterized as the tendency to keep the status-quo and protect national sovereignty from the international intervention (namely, U.S.).
GiBaek Jun. “Redirecting of foreign policy of Putin's government and the North East Asia”, presented at the 1st Korea-Russia Strategy Forum. 2005.
4.
TreninDmitriLoBobo, “The Landscape of Russian Foreign Policy Decision-Making”, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2005.
5.
HuiHan Seok. “The Emergence of China and Responsibility of Great-power Chauvinism”, International Politics Collections. Vol. 44 (1). Seoul: Korea Association of International Studies. 2004.
6.
BurakovskyIgor, “Regional economic integration as an element of economic security”, the Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting, Kiev, Ukraine, 2005.
7.
FumagalliMatteo, “Alignments and Realignments in Central Asia: The Rationale and Implications of Uzbekistan's Rapprochement with Russia”, International Political Science Review, 2007.
8.
Park sang nam, “Following Geopolitical Changes of Central Asia Brought by U.S. Troops Presence - Strategies and Responses of Central Asia, Russia, and China.”, International Area Review, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, 2003.
9.
FumagalliMatteo“U.S.'s Choice and the Central Asia”, International Area News and Report. Centre for International Area Studies of Hankuk University of Foreign Studies. Vol.7 (11). 2003.
10.
RichardSakwa. “Putin's Foreign Policy: Transforming ‘the East’ in Russia between East and West: Russian Foreign Policy on the Threshold of the Twenty-First Century”..
11.
Vitaly Tretiyakov. “Gipoteza o bol'shom treugolnike” (‘The Hypothesis about the Big Triangle’), Politichesky Mass (Political Class), No. 10, October 2005.
12.
FedorovYury E., ‘“Boffins’ and ‘Buffoons’: Different Strains of Thought in Russia's Strategic Thinking”, RUSSIA AND EURASIA PROGRAMME REP BP 06/01,.***Chatham house, 2006.
13.
IgoryZonnSergeyZhiltsov. “Russia and the U.S. in Central Asia and the Caucasus: a search for regional stability”, Central Asia and the Caucasus. Vol. 19 (1). Sweden: CA&CC Press. 2003.
