The East Asian crisis was a catalyst for changing Japan's regional position and leadership role and therefore had significant implications for Japan's geo-political and economic relationship with East Asia. The Japanese government maintained the ‘developmental state’ approach in collaborating with the economic restructuring programmes in major East Asian countries after the crisis. Japanese responses to the crisis had significant implications for East Asian regional integration. They clearly indicated the shift in Japan's behaviour and the emergence of a regional leadership role in promoting regional integration in East Asia. This suggests that Japanese confidence in the validity of the developmental state concept prompted the government to reconsider its pro-active role in the establishment of an ASEAN +3 Summit.
BaeG. C. (2001) ASEAN + 3 regional co-operation: changes and prospects. Korean Observations on Foreign Relations3, 1: 106–21
2.
BevacquaR. (1998) Whither the Japanese model? The Asian economic crisis and the continuation of Cold War politics in the Pacific Rim. Review of International Political Economy5, 3: 410–23
3.
DieterH.HiggottR. (2003) Exploring alternative theories of economic regionalism: from trade to finance in Asian co-operation?Review of International Political Economy10, 3: 430–54
4.
FloodR. P.GarberP. M.KramerC. (1996) Collapsing exchange rate regimes another linear explain. Journal of International Economics41, 3–4: 223–34
5.
GilsonJ. (1999) Japan's role in the Asia-Europe meeting: establishing an international or intra-regional agenda?Asian Survey34, 5: 736–52
6.
GreenM. J. (2001) Japan's Reluctant Realism: Foreign Policy Changes in an Era of Uncertain Power, New York: Palgrave
7.
GrimesW. W. (2000) Japan and globalisation: from opportunity to restraint, in KimS. S., ed., East Asia and Globalisation, Lanham and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, pp. 55–79
8.
HaggardS. (2000) The Political Economy of the Asian Financial Crisis, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics
9.
HewD.AnthonyM. C. (2000) ASEAN and ASEAN + 3 in post-crisis Asia, NIRA Review7, 4: 21–6
10.
HookG. D. (2002) Japan's role in the East Asian political economy: from crisis to bloc?Asian Business & Management1, 1: 19–37
11.
HookG. D.GilsonJ.HughesC. W.DobsonH. (2001) Japan's International Relations: Politics, Economics and Security, London and New York: Routledge
12.
HughesC. W. (2000) Japanese policy and the East Asian currency crisis: abject defeat or quiet victory?. Review of International Political Economy7, 2: 219–53
13.
HundM. (2003) ASEAN Plus Three: towards a new age of pan-East Asian regionalism? A skeptic's appraisal, The Pacific Review16, 3: 383–417
14.
IslamI.ChowdhuryA. (2000) The Political Economy of East Asia: Post-Crisis Debates, Oxford: Oxford University Press
15.
ItohM. (2000) The Japanese Economy Reconsidered, London and New York: Palgrave
16.
JohnsonC. (1999) The developmental sate as myth and moral ambition, in Woo-CumingsM., ed., The Developmental State, Ithaca and London: Cornell University, pp. 37–60
17.
KatzensteinP. J. (2000) Regionalism and Asia, New Political Economy5, 3: 353–68
18.
KindlebergerC. P. (1978) Manias, Panics, and Crises: A History of Financial Crises, London and New York: Macmillan Press
19.
KingM. R. (2001) Who triggered the Asian financial crisis?Review of International Political Economy8, 3: 438–66
20.
KoharaM. (2001) ASEAN purasu tsuri no wakugumi: hirakareta chki kyryoku no tame ni Nihon ga dekiru koto to wa [The framework of ASEAN + 3: Japan's role towards open regional co-operation]. Gaik Frumu152, 3: 77–81, (in Japanese)
21.
MaswoodS. J. (2002) Developmental states in crisis, in BeesonM, ed., Reconfiguring East Asia: Regional Institutions and Organisations after the Crisis, London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon, pp. 31–48
22.
MaswoodS. J. (2003) Japan in Crisis, London: Palgrave Macmillan
23.
METI. (1999) Heisei 12 Nendo Tssh Sangy Seisaku no Jten [The Priorities in Commercial and Industrial Policy in 2000], Tokyo: METI, (in Japanese)
24.
NabersD. (2003) The social construction of international institutions: the case of ASEAN + 3, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific3, 3: 113–36
25.
PrakashA.HartJ. A. (1999) Globalization and governance: an introduction. in PrakashA.HartJ. A., eds, Globalization and Governance, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 1–24
26.
RapkinD. P. (2001) The United States, Japan, and the power to block: the APEC and AMF cases. The Pacific Review14, 3: 373–410
27.
RavenhillJ. (2000) APEC adrift: implications for economic regionalism in Asia and Pacific. The Pacific Review13, 2: 319–33
28.
SakakibaraE. (with an Introduction by C. V. Prestowitz, Jr.) (1993) Beyond Capitalism: The Japanese Model of Market Economics, Lanham, New York and London: University Press of America
29.
StubbsR. (2002) ASEAN Plus Three: emerging East Asian regionalism?Asian Survey42, 3: 440–55
30.
TanakaN. (2003) Ajia chki shugi no kokusai kiny kyryoku to Rezmu keisei: ASEAN + 3 ni yoru Chiang Mai Inishiachibu [Regime formation and international monetary cooperation in East Asia: Chiang Mai Initiative within ASEAN + 3], paper presented to the Japanese Association of International Relations, in Tsukuba 17–19 October 2003, (in Japanese)
31.
TakahashiS. (2001) The global meaning of Japan: The state's persistently precarious position in world order, in HookG. D.HasegawaH., eds, The Political Economy of Japanese Globalization, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 19–39
32.
WebberD. (2001) Two funerals and a wedding? The ups and downs of regionalism in East Asia and Asia-Pacific after the Asian crisis, The Pacific Review14, 3: 339–72
33.
WhittakerD. H.KurosawaY. (1998) Japan's crisis: evolution and implications. Cambridge Journal of Economics22, 4: 761–71
34.
BankWorld (2000) East Asia: Recovery and Beyond, Washington, DC
35.
YoshimatsuH. (2003) Japan and East Asia in Transition: Trade policy, Crisis and Evolution, and Regionalism, London and New York: Macmillan Press
36.
YoungO. R. (1983) Regime dynamics: the rise and fall of international regimes. in KrasnerS., ed., International Regimes, Ithaca: Cornell University, pp. 93–113
37.
YoungO. R. (1991) Political leadership and regime formation: on the development of institutions in international society. International Organization45, 3: 281–308
