The purpose of this research is to review the characteristics, contributions, and limitations of the existing corruption index measurement models by comparison and analysis. Based upon such review, I intend to provide a more logical and systematic alternative model utilizing AHP method. First, I suggest the corruption index calculation method as a procedural process. Second, I applied the AHP method and put weighted values to the items, elements, and index of measurement and, thereby, enable the prioritization of items, elements, and index of measurement. Third, I suggest a desirable model for measuring administrative corruption index for the future by overcoming the limitations of the existing models. Finally, I present five expected effects and utilities of the new model which can overcome the existing limitations.
ChoiByung DaeDevelopment of Model for Measuring City Government's Integrity II, Seoul City Government Development Research Institute, 2000 (In Korean)
2.
ChoiByung DaeLeeJong WonResearch on the Development of Model for Measuring Integrity (I) - Focusing on the Five Vulnerable Sectors, Seoul City Government Development Research Institute, 1999 (In Korean)
3.
ChoiChang Ho.New Administration. Seoul: Sam Young Sa, 2000 (In Korean)
4.
Citizens' Coalition for Economic Justice. CCEJ Corruption Index, Seoul: CCEJ Anti-Corruption Activities Center, 2000 (In Korean)
5.
Collins Cobuild English Dictionary. Glasgow, Bishopbriggs: Harper Collins Publishers, 1995
6.
HanSang JinResearch on the Improvement of Government Employee's Ethical Standards and People's Recognition, The Academy of Korean Studies, 1999 (In Korean)
7.
HanJung HwaBaeJong SukInvestigative Research on the Concept of Venture Company Transparency and Determinative Factors, Korea International Business Society, 1999 (In Korean)
8.
HeidenheimerArnold J. ed. Political Corruption, New Brunswick: Transaction, 1989
9.
JeonSu Il, Corruption of Bureaucracy, Seoul, Sun-Hak Publication, 1999 (In Korean)
10.
JinMi Kyung“Modern Democracy and Legitimacy Theory,”Korean Politics Society Journal, vol. 27, no. 2. 1995 (In Korean)
11.
JungJung GilNew Understanding of Administration, Seoul: Dae Myung Publishing, 2000 (In Korean)
12.
KimDong Hui.Administrative Law I, Seoul: Bak Young Sa, 2000 (In Korean)
13.
KimMan KiDevelopment and Application of City and Province Educational Board's Evaluation Index Using the AHP Method, Ministry of Education and Human Resources, 1998 (In Korean)
14.
KimYoung Jong“Corruption and Audit Bodies,”Korea Administration Research, vol. 7, no. 4, 1996 (In Korean)
15.
KimHang KyuPhilosophy of Administration, Seoul: Dae Young Mun Hwa Sa, 1999 (In Korean)
16.
LeeChung Min.Comparative Study on the Corruption Index Measurement Model, Seoul City University, Thesis, 2002 (In Korean)
17.
MinJinIntroductory Administration, Seoul: Go Si Yun Gu Sa, 2000 (In Korean)
18.
MohrLawrence B.Impact Analysis for Program Evaluation, Chicago, Illinois: The Dorsey Press, 1998
19.
NaSung LinChunYoung Sup, Public Economics, Seoul: Hak Hyun Sa, 1995 (In Korean)
20.
OhSuk HongAdministration, Seoul: Na Nam Publishing, 2001 (In Korean)
21.
ParkJae WanParkWon Young“Corruption Index Measurement Model: MIMIC and DYMIMIC,”Korean Corruption Study Society, vol. 6, 2001 (In Korean)
22.
ParkJung SuResearch on the Development of Corporate Corruption Measurement Model, Seoul City University, Anti-Corruption System Research Institute, Research Paper 2000–5 (In Korean)
23.
ParkJong Min.Fairness and Credibility of People's Government, Korean Politics Society, 1997 (In Korean)
24.
ParkJoong HunStatus and Improvement Plan for Government Corruption, Committee for Second Opening of Nation, 2000 (In Korean)
25.
ParkJoong Hun.Development of Corruption Index Measurement Model, Korea Administration Research Institute, 1999 (In Korean)
26.
ParkJoong Hun.Status of Corruption in Korea and Its Analysis, Korea Administration Research Institute, 1999 (In Korean)
SaatyT.L.KearnsK. P.Analytical Planning: The Organization of Systems. New York: Pergamon Press, 1991
29.
YoonYoung JinLeeJong SuNew Administration, Seoul: Dae Young Mun Hwa Sa, 2000 (In Korean)
30.
YunJong Seol.A New Alternative Model through Analysis of Administrative Corruption Measurement Models, Zeitschrift der Koreanisch-Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Sozealwissenschaften, vol. 12, no. 1. 2002
