This paper looks at the APEC process of trade liberalisation and, in particular, at the Early Voluntary Sector Liberalisation approach to industrial trade liberalisation and facilitation. It also examines the GATTAVTO experience with sector-based negotiations. The experience in both APEC and the GATTAVTO is that sector-based negotiations make it more difficult to achieve trade-offs in negotiations. The paper finds that the EVSL proposal is very limited in its scope and likely benefits, and the experiment should not be repeated.
DeeP.HardinA.ScheleM. (1998). APEC Early Voluntary Sector Liberalisation, Productivity Commission Staff Research Paper, AusInfo, Canberra
5.
HattaT.FukushimaT. (1979). “The Welfare Effects of Tariff Rate Reductions in a Many Country World,”Journal of International Economics, Vol. 9, 503–511
6.
KrishnaP.PanagariyaA. (1997). “A Unification of the Theory of Second-best,” University of Maryland at College Park, Working Papers in International Economics, No. 31
7.
LanzonaL. (1999). “The Social Impact of APEC TILF: the Philippines Case,” paper presented to the APEC Studies Centre Consortium Conference 1999, Auckland, 31 May-2 June
8.
LloydP. J. (1999). “APEC and WTO,” paper presented to the PECC Trade Policy Forum Conference in Auckland, New Zealand, 3–4 June 1999
9.
StewartT. (ed) (1993). The GATT Uruguay Round: A Negotiating History, Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, Vol. I
10.
WintersL. A. (1987). “Reciprocity,” in FingerJ. M.OlechowskiA. (eds) The Uruguay Round: A Handbook for the Multilateral Trade Negotiations, World Bank, Washington, D. C.
