The inherently practical nature of clinical skills means they may be less amenable to online or technology-supported teaching and learning than other domains within health science education. There is a dearth of literature and limited knowledge regarding staff and student perceptions of digitally enhanced practical teaching across health science disciplines. The aim of this study was to explore staff and students’ perceptions to digitally assisted teaching and learning methods in practical health sciences education as well as the perceived barriers to and opportunities for use.
Methods
A cross-sectional online survey was distributed among third level institutions, examining staff and student experiences of digitally enhanced practical teaching, perceived opportunities and barriers and personal experiences of practical skill assessment. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse quantitative data while open ended questions were analysed using content analysis.
Results
Forty-one staff and 96 students competed the survey. Attitudes towards digitally enhanced practical teaching were mixed; staff described digital tools as holding potential while students believed tools were not best utilised by educators. Of the staff who had not carried out digitally enhanced assessment (56%, n = 23), 39% (n = 9) struggled to identify an appropriate technology supported method to assess learning outcomes.
Conclusion
The current study identified the importance of maximising aspects of traditional teaching and technology enhanced teaching and ensuring a balance between teaching approaches for student success.
VogelDHarendzaS. Basic practical skills teaching and learning in undergraduate medical education - a review on methodological evidence. GMS J Med Educ2016; 33(4): Doc64. https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001063
2.
TolsgaardMG. Clinical skills training in undergraduate medical education using a student-centered approach. Dan Med J2013; 60(8): B4690.
3.
RobertsFCooperK. Effectiveness of high fidelity simulation versus low fidelity simulation on practical/clinical skill development in pre-registration physiotherapy students: a systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep2019; 17(6): 1229–1255. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003931
4.
Al-ElqAH. Medicine and clinical skills laboratories. Journal of family & community medicine2007; 14(2): 59–63.
CattagniAWestatEF. Internet access in US public schools and classrooms-1994-2000: US department of education. Office of Educational Research and Improvement, 2001.
7.
VankaAVankaSWaliO. Flipped classroom in dental education: a scoping review. Eur J Dent Educ : Official Journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe2020; 24(2): 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12487
8.
PeiLWuH. Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ Online2019; 24(1): 1666538. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538
9.
BockAKnihaKGoloborodkoE, et al.Effectiveness of face-to-face, blended and e-learning in teaching the application of local anaesthesia: a randomised study. BMC Med Educ2021; 21(1): 137. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02569-z
10.
GamageKAWijesuriyaDIEkanayakeSY, et al.Online delivery of teaching and laboratory practices: continuity of university programmes during COVID-19 pandemic. Educ Sci2020; 10(10): 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100291
WallaceDSturrockAGishenF. You've got mail!’: clinical and practical skills teaching re-imagined during COVID-19. Future Healthc J2021; 8(1): e50–e53. https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2020-0231
13.
De PontiRMarazzatoJMarescaAM, et al.Pre-graduation medical training including virtual reality during COVID-19 pandemic: a report on students' perception. BMC Med Educ2020; 20(1): 332. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02245-8
14.
ZambergISchifferEStoermann-ChopardC. Novice and advanced learners' satisfaction and perceptions of an e-learning renal semiology module during the COVID-19 pandemic: mixed methods study. JMIR medical education2021; 7(2): e29216. https://doi.org/10.2196/29216
15.
FordeCObrienA. A literature review of barriers and opportunities presented by digitally enhanced practical skill teaching and learning in health science education. Med Educ Online2022; 27(1): 2068210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2068210
16.
WiederholdBK. Connecting through technology during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: avoiding “Zoom Fatigue”. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 140 Huguenot Street, 3rd Floor New, 2020, pp. 437–438.
17.
BdairIA. Nursing students' and faculty members' perspectives about online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. Teaching and learning in nursing, 2021.
18.
EltaybaniSAbdelhalimGEAbdelgawadME (eds). Nursing students' and educators' experience with e‐learning during a pandemic: An online survey. Nursing Forum. Wiley Online Library, 2021.
19.
LondgrenMFBaillieSRobertsJN, et al.A survey to establish the extent of flipped classroom use prior to clinical skills laboratory teaching and determine potential benefits, challenges, and possibilities. J Vet Med Educ2021; 48(4): 463–469. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2019-0137
20.
IbrahimNKAlRRAlDarmasiM, et al.Medical students' acceptance and perceptions of e-learning during the Covid-19 closure time in King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah. J Infect Public Health2021; 14(1): 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2020.11.007
21.
TangACYWongNWongTKS. Learning experience of Chinese nursing students in an online clinical English course: qualitative study. Nurse Educ Today2015; 35(2): e61–e66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.11.017
Randy Garrison TaDArcherW. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. Internet High Educ1999; 2(2): 19.
24.
YoonHLeeEKimCJ, et al.Virtual reality simulation-based clinical procedure skills training for nursing college students: a quasi-experimental study. Healthcare (Basel)2024; 12(11): 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12111109
25.
HalmanJTencerSSieminskiM. Artificial intelligence and extended reality in the training of vascular surgeons: a narrative review. Med Sci2025; 13(3): 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13030126
26.
PlotzkyCLoesslBKuhnertB, et al.My hands are running away - learning a complex nursing skill via virtual reality simulation: a randomised mixed methods study. BMC Nurs2023; 22(1): 222. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01384-9
27.
RezayiSShahmoradiLGhotbiN, et al.Computerized simulation education on physiotherapy students' skills and knowledge: a systematic review. BioMed Res Int2022; 2022: 4552974. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4552974
28.
Lucena-AntonDFernandez-LopezJCPacheco-SerranoAI, et al.Virtual and augmented reality versus traditional methods for teaching physiotherapy: a systematic review. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ2022; 12(12): 1780–1792. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe12120125
29.
PagelsLSchindlerOLuedtkeK. Overview of styles, content, learning effects and attitudes of students towards digitally enhanced physiotherapy education - a scoping review. BMC Med Educ2025; 25(1): 176. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06750-6
30.
FordeCO'BrienACroitoruO, et al.Comparing Face-to-Face, blended and online teaching approaches for practical skill acquisition: a randomised controlled trial. Med Sci Educ2024; 34(3): 627–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02026-8
31.
AsmarNYoussefNYMalhabSB, et al.Evaluating construct validity of virtual osces in exceptional conditions. BMC Med Educ2025; 25(1): 841. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07383-5
32.
ConcannonBJEsmailSRoduta RobertsM. Immersive virtual reality for the reduction of state anxiety in clinical interview exams: prospective cohort study. JMIR Serious Games2020; 8(3): e18313. https://doi.org/10.2196/18313
33.
MakVKrishnanSChuangS. Students' and examiners' experiences of their first virtual pharmacy objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare (Basel)2022; 10(2): 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10020328
34.
O’MearaACMBolgerASettiA. Virtual reality nature exposure and test anxiety. Multimodal Technol Interact2020; 4.
35.
MoffettJCassidyDCollinsN, et al.Exploring medical students' learning around uncertainty management using a digital educational escape room: a design-based research approach. Perspect Med Educ2023; 12(1): 86–98. https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.844
36.
ChangJJHainADosiouC, et al.Use of the community of inquiry framework to measure student and facilitator perceptions of online flipped classroom compared with online lecture learning in undergraduate medical education. Adv Med Educ Pract2023; 14: 963–972. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S413201
37.
DebnathMOjhaSNiraulaA, et al.Perceptions of medical and allied health students towards online education during the COVID-19 pandemic phases and its future impact in India. J Eur CME2021; 10(1): 1993428. https://doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2021.1993428
38.
ChandrasiriNRWeerakoonBS. Online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: perceptions of allied health sciences undergraduates. Radiography2022; 28(2): 545–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2021.11.008
39.
Motte-SignoretELabbeABenoistG, et al.Perception of medical education by learners and teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of online teaching. Med Educ Online2021; 26(1): 1919042. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1919042
40.
MoroCStrombergaZRaikosA, et al.The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anat Sci Educ2017; 10(6): 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1696
41.
ShishehgarSMurray-ParahiPAlsharaydehE, et al.Artificial intelligence in health education and practice: a systematic review of health students' and academics' knowledge, perceptions and experiences. Int Nurs Rev2025; 72(2): e70045. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.70045
O'BrienAFordeC. Health science staff and student experiences of teaching and assessing clinical skills using digital tools: a qualitative study. Ann Med2023; 55(2): 2256656. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2256656
