Low back pain (LBP) is a common problem in athletes including those in Gaelic games. Valid, reliable and feasible clinical tests to evaluate trunk function are necessary for practitioners working in the field.
Objectives
This pilot study aimed to investigate the intra-rater reliability and known-groups validity of tests for isometric trunk muscle strength using a hand-held dynamometer (HHD) and trunk endurance using the McGill protocol and novel ‘long-lever’ tests in a group of male Gaelic games athletes, with and without LBP.
Methods
Nine participants with and without LBP were recruited. All completed a battery of strength and endurance tests. Intra-tester (relative and absolute) was determined by calculating the intraclass coefficients (ICC 2,1), standard error of measurement and minimal detectible change. Known-groups validity was investigated using independent T-tests and measuring the effect sizes (Cohen’s d) of the tests.
Results
Isometric strength testing using an HHD for flexion, extension and rotation showed excellent reliability for both groups (ICC = 0.78–0.89). All endurance tests, except the long-lever lateral flexion tests, showed excellent intra-tester reliability in both groups (ICC = 0.76–0.98). Three tests, right isometric lateral flexion strength, isometric extension strength and the Biering-Sorensen endurance test, were shown to discriminate between those with and without LBP in this cohort (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
Isometric strength testing using an HHD and certain endurance tests are reliable, valid and feasible for use in athletes with and without LBP. Isometric extension strength and endurance can discriminate between those with and without LBP.
WilsonFArdernCLHartvigsenJ, et al.Prevalence and risk factors for back pain in sports: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med2020; 55(11) 1–9.
2.
HoyDBainCWilliamsG, et al.A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum2012; 64: 2028–2037.
3.
HartvigsenJHancockMJKongstedA, et al.What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet2018; 391: 2356–2367.
4.
HeneweerHVanheesLPicavetHSJ. Physical activity and low back pain: a U-shaped relation?Pain2009; 143: 21–25.
5.
TrompeterKFettDPlatenP. Prevalence of back pain in sports: a systematic review of the literature. Sports Med2017; 47: 1183–1207.
6.
DekkersTSullivanKORoeM, et al.Physical therapy in sport the epidemiology of back injuries in elite gaelic football athletes: an 8-year prospective study. Phys Ther Sport2022; 57(13): 105–111.
7.
RoeMMurphyJCGissaneC, et al.Lower limb injuries in men’s elite gaelic football: a prospective investigation among division one teams from 2008 to 2015. J Sci Med Sport2018; 21: 155–159.
8.
IwaiKNakazatoKIrieK, et al.Trunk muscle strength and disability level of low back pain in collegiate wrestlers. Med Sci Sports Exerc2004; 36: 1296–1300.
9.
LindsayDMHortonJF. Trunk rotation strength and endurance in healthy normals and elite male golfers with and without low back pain. N Am J Sports Phys Ther2006; 1: 80–89.
10.
FenetyAKumarS. Isokinetic trunk strength and lumbosacral range of motion in elite female field hockey players reporting low-back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther1992; 16: 129–135.
11.
CataláMMSchrollALaubeG, et al.Muscle strength and neuromuscular control in low-back pain: elite athletes versus general population. Front Neurosci2018; 12: 1–10.
12.
AbdelraoufORAbdel-AziemAA. The relationship between core endurance and back dysfunction in collegiate Male athletes with and without nonspecific low back pain. Int J Sports Phys Ther2016; 11: 337–344.
13.
CorreiaJPOliveiraRVazJR, et al.Trunk muscle activation, fatigue and low back pain in tennis players. J Sci Med Sport2016; 19: 311–316.
14.
JacksonJKShepherdTRKellRT. The influence of periodized resistance training on recreationally active males with chronic nonspecific low back pain. J Strength Cond Res2011; 25: 242–251.
15.
SeshagiriraoMSusmithaKSSK. A randomised controlled study on core stability exercise programme using swiss ball, theraband and floor exercises in cricketers with low back pain. Int J Physiother2015; 2: 885–893.
16.
StuberKJBrunoPSajkoS, et al.Core stability exercises for low back pain in athletes: a systematic review of the literature. Clin J Sport Med2014; 24: 448–456.
HibbsAEThompsonKGFrenchD, et al.Optimizing performance by improving core stability and core strength. Sports Med2008; 38: 995–1008.
19.
WirthKHartmannHMickelC, et al.Core stability in athletes: a critical analysis of current guidelines. Sports Med2017; 47: 401–414.
20.
HidesJADonelsonRLeeD, et al.Convergence and divergence of exercise-based approaches that incorporate motor control for the management of low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2019; 49: 437–452.
21.
ThorntonJSCaneiroJPHartvigsenJ, et al.Treating low back pain in athletes: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med2021; 55: 656–662.
22.
WoodLFosterNEDeanSG, et al.Contexts, behavioural mechanisms and outcomes to optimise therapeutic exercise prescription for persistent low back pain: a realist review. Br J Sports Med2024; 58: 222–230.
23.
MorelandJFinchEStratfordP, et al.Interrater reliability of six tests of trunk muscle function and endurance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther1997; 26: 200–208.
24.
EvansKRefshaugeKMAdamsR. Trunk muscle endurance tests: reliability, and gender differences in athletes. J Sci Med Sport2007; 10: 447–455.
25.
McGillSMChildsALiebensonC. Endurance times for low back stabilization exercises: clinical targets for testing and training from a normal database. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1999; 80: 941–944.
26.
Biering-SørensonF. Physical measurements as risk indicators for low-back trouble over a one-year period. Spine1984; 9: 106–119.
27.
García-VaqueroMPBarbadoDJuan-RecioC, et al.Isokinetic trunk flexion–extension protocol to assess trunk muscle strength and endurance: reliability, learning effect, and sex differences. J Sport Health Sci2020; 9: 692–701.
28.
de OliveiraIOPilzBSantosRLG, et al.Reference values and reliability for lumbopelvic strength and endurance in asymptomatic subjects. Braz J Phys Ther2018; 22: 33–41.
29.
Juan-RecioCLópez-PlazaDBarbado MurilloD, et al.Reliability assessment and correlation analysis of 3 protocols to measure trunk muscle strength and endurance. J Sports Sci2018; 36: 357–364.
30.
WaldhelmALiL. Endurance tests are the most reliable core stability related measurements. J Sport Health Sci2012; 1: 121–128.
31.
AnderssonEANilssonJMaZ, et al.Abdominal and hip flexor muscle activation during various training exercises. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol1997; 75: 115–123.
32.
GreenePFDurallCJKernozekTW. Intersession reliability and concurrent validity of isometric endurance tests for the lateral trunk muscles. J Sport Rehabil2012; 21: 161–166.
33.
StarkTWalkerBPhillipsJK, et al.Hand-held dynamometry correlation with the gold standard isokinetic dynamometry: a systematic review. PM R2011; 3: 472–479.
34.
ChenBLiuLChenLB, et al.Concurrent validity and reliability of a handheld dynamometer in measuring isometric shoulder rotational strength. J Sport Rehabil2021; 30: 965–968.
35.
ThorborgKPetersenJMagnussonSP, et al.Clinical assessment of hip strength using a hand-held dynamometer is reliable. Scand J Med Sci Sports2010; 20: 493–501.
36.
MartinsJDa SilvaJRDa SilvaMRB, et al.Reliability and validity of the belt-stabilized handheld dynamometer in hip-and knee-strength tests. J Athl Train2017; 52: 809–819.
37.
De BlaiserCDe RidderRWillemsT, et al.Reliability and validity of trunk flexor and trunk extensor strength measurements using handheld dynamometry in a healthy athletic population. Phys Ther Sport2018; 34: 180–186.
38.
BrooksJHMFullerCWKempSPT, et al.Epidemiology of injuries in English professional rugby union: part 1 match injuries. Br J Sports Med2005; 39: 757–766.
39.
Kowalchuk HornKJenningsSRichardsonG, et al.The patient-specific functional scale: psychometrics, clinimetrics, and application as a clinical outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2012; 42: 30–42.
40.
NoormohammadpourPHosseini KhezriAFarahbakhshF, et al.Reliability and validity of athletes disability index questionnaire. Clin J Sport Med2018; 28: 159–167.
41.
ThygesenELindstromTCSaevareidHI, et al.The subjective health complaints inventory: a useful instrument to identify various aspects of health and ability to cope in older people?Scand J Public Health2009; 37: 690–696.
42.
WaddellGNewtonMHendersonI, et al.A fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain1993; 52: 157–168.
43.
BurnsSPBreuningerAKaplanC, et al.Hand-held dynamometry in persons with tetraplegia: comparison of make- versus break-testing techniques. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2005; 84: 22–29.
44.
KatoSMurakamiHDemuraS, et al.Abdominal trunk muscle weakness and its association with chronic low back pain and risk of falling in older women. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2019; 20: 273.
45.
TrevethanR. Intraclass correlation coefficients: clearing the air, extending some cautions, and making some requests. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol2017; 17: 127–143.
46.
CicchettiDV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess1994; 6: 284–290.
47.
WeirJPVincentWJ. Statistics in kinesiology. 5th ed.Human Kinetics, 2020.
48.
RubioDMBerg-WegerMTebbSS, et al.Objectifying content validity: conducting a content validity study in social work research. Soc Work Res2003; 27: 94–104.
49.
JørgensenRRisIFallaD, et al.Reliability, construct and discriminative validity of clinical testing in subjects with and without chronic neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2014; 15: 408.
50.
LakensD. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol2013; 4: 863.
51.
SullivanGMFeinnR. Using effect Size—Or why the P value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ2012; 4: 279–282.
52.
TarcaBDWycherleyTPMeadeA, et al.Validity and reliability of hand-held dynamometry for abdominal flexion muscular assessment. J Sport Rehabil2021; 30: 343–346.
53.
AlthobaitiSFallaD. Reliability and criterion validity of handheld dynamometry for measuring trunk muscle strength in people with and without chronic non-specific low back pain. Musculoskelet Sci Pract2023; 66: 102799.
54.
OyamaSGarzaEDuganK. Intrasession and intersession reliability of isometric trunk and hip strength measurements using the portable tension dynamometer. J Sport Rehabil2021; 30: 1111–1114.
55.
NewmanBLPollockCLHuntMA. Reliability of measurement of maximal isometric lateral trunk-flexion strength in athletes using handheld dynamometry. J Sport Rehabil2012; 21: 10.1123/jsr.2012.TR6.
56.
LatimerJMaherCGRefshaugeK, et al.The reliability and validity of the biering–sorensen test in asymptomatic subjects and subjects reporting current or previous nonspecific low back pain. Spine1999; 24: 2085–2089.
57.
RossiDMMorcelliMHCardozoAC, et al.Discriminant analysis of neuromuscular variables in chronic low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil2015; 28: 239–246.
58.
TekinYOrtancilOAnkaraliH, et al.Biering-Sorensen test scores in coal miners. Jt Bone Spine2009; 76: 281–285.
59.
LarivièCBilodeauMForgetR, et al.Mecheri H poor back muscle endurance is related to pain catastrophizing in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine1976; 35(22): E1178–E1186.
60.
ShawJJacobsJVVan DillenLR, et al.Understanding the biering-sørensen test: contributors to extensor endurance in young adults with and without a history of low back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2024; 74: 102854.
61.
MoffroidMReidSHenrySM, et al.Some endurance measures in persons with chronic low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther1994; 20(2): 81–87.
62.
DemoulinCVanderthommenMDuysensC, et al.Spinal muscle evaluation using the sorensen test: a critical appraisal of the literature. Jt Bone Spine2006; 73: 43–50.
63.
KoumantakisGAOldhamJA. Paraspinal strength and electromyographic fatigue in patients with sub-acute back pain and controls: reliability, clinical applicability and between-group differences. World J Orthop2021; 12: 816–832.
64.
MurphyJCO’MalleyEGissaneC, et al.Incidence of injury in gaelic football: a 4-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med2012; 40: 2113–2120.
65.
MurphyJCGissaneCBlakeC. Injury in elite county-level hurling: a prospective study. Br J Sports Med2012; 46: 138–142.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
