Influence of foot posture on pelvic inclination in collegiate track and field athletes: An observational study

Abstract

Background

Track and field athletes engage in high-impact sports and their feet are subjected to a significant amount of force during jumping and sprinting; thus, there have been a greater number of foot posture deviations seen in these athletes. These forces have been revealed to contribute to musculoskeletal alterations and lower extremity malalignment up to the pelvis, which consequently causes uneven strains on the joints, inefficient muscle function, and impaired lower limb proprioception in the kinetic chain.

Objective

To find the influence of foot posture on pelvic inclination in collegiate track and field athletes using Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) and smartphone inclinometer. Furthermore, the study also aimed to compare the foot posture types among track and field athletes.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted on 56 track and field athletes within the age group 18–25 years from various colleges in Belagavi city. They were assessed using Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) to determine foot posture type, and smartphone inclinometer to determine the pelvic inclination.

Results

The results revealed a strong positive correlation between foot posture and pelvic inclination of the left side (r = 0.62) and right side (r = 0.70). Furthermore, higher FPI scores have been significantly correlated with higher degrees of pelvic inclination in these athletes.

Conclusion

The study concluded that there is an influence of foot posture on pelvic inclination in collegiate track and field athletes. Additionally, our study suggested that pronated feet have been associated with a higher pelvic inclination angle due to the existence of the kinetic chain.

Keywords

foot posture pronation supination track and field athletes pelvic inclination

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hunsawong

Motantasuta

Mato

, et al. Agreement between clinical measures to classify foot posture in asymptomatic adults. BMC Muscoskelet Disord 2022; 23(1): 1042. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-06023-z.

Williams

III McClay

Hamill

. Arch structure and injury patterns in runners. Clin Biomech 2001; 16(4): 341–347. DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(01)00005-5.

Sharma

Upadhyaya

. Effect of flat foot on the running ability of an athlete. Indian J Orthop 2016; 2(1). DOI: 10.5958/2395-1362.2016.00017.7.

Martínez-Nova

Gómez-Blázquez

Escamilla-Martínez

, et al. The foot posture index in men practicing three sports different in their biomechanical gestures. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2014; 104(2): 154–158. DOI: 10.7547/0003-0538-104.2.154.

Kuo

Liu

YSF

. The foot posture index between elite athletic and sedentary college students. Kinesiology 2017; 49(2): 202–207. DOI: 10.26582/k.49.2.6.

Alizadeh

Mattes

. How anterior pelvic tilt affects the lower extremity kinematics during the late swing phase in soccer players while running: a time series analysis. Hum Mov Sci 2019; 66: 459–466. DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2019.06.001.

Khamis

Yizhar

. Effect of feet hyperpronation on pelvic alignment in a standing position. Gait Posture 2007; 25(1): 127–134. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.02.005.

Pinto

RZA

Souza

Trede

, et al. Bilateral and unilateral increases in calcaneal eversion affect pelvic alignment in standing position. Man Ther 2008; 13(6): 513–519. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2007.06.004.

Pradhan

Korada

Kumar

, et al. Correlation of foot posture with balance and pelvic tilt in healthy runners. Physiother Quart 2021; 29(4): 18–21. DOI: 10.5114/pq.2021.105748.

10.

Yang

Mao

, et al. Reliability and validity of Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) for evaluating foot posture in participants with low back pain. Sci Rep 2022; 12(1): 21168. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22220-1.

11.

Jeon

. Reliability and validity of measurement using smart phone- based goniometer on pelvic tilting angle in standing and sitting position. J Kor Phys Ther 2019; 31(1): 35–39. DOI: 10.18857/jkpt.2019.31.1.35.

12.

Gandhi

Salvi

. Correlation between pronated foot and pelvic inclination, femoral anteversion, quadriceps angle and tibial torsion. Int J Physiother 2017; 4(4). DOI: 10.15621/ijphy/2017/v4i4/154718.