Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

Our aim was to conduct a review to summarize the existing information regarding the effects of shoe collar height in altering ankle sprain mechanics in athletes.

Methods:

A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and SPORTDiscus was conducted in September 2019.

Results:

There were 10 studies published from 1993 to 2019 that were included. Most studies showed high-top shoes limited ankle sprain kinematics and increased resistance to inversion moment in static but not dynamic testing. High-top shoes were associated with delayed pre-landing ankle evertor muscle activation and smaller electromyography amplitudes.

Conclusions:

There is currently weak evidence to support that high-top shoes can limit ankle sprain kinematics in dynamic testing. Further studies with more consistent study interventions and outcome variables are needed to definitively establish the effects of shoe collar height on ankle sprain mechanics in athletes.

The Translational Potential of this Article:

Multiple studies on the effects of shoe collar height and ankle sprain mechanics have been performed but there is a lack of consistency in terms of study design, intervention, and outcome measures. A formal systematic review and meta-analysis were not applicable due to the heterogeneity of studies, and mixed results from these studies can be confusing to interpret, making further research on this topic difficult as a result of lack of future direction. We summarized the existing literature on this topic to provide a clearer picture and guide future research on this controversial matter.

Keywords

Ankle sprain shoe collar height ankle instability

Introduction

Ankle sprains are the most common injuries in the athletic population.^1,2 The prevalence is as high as 28% and up to 73% of the athletes had recurrent ankle sprain.³. Lateral ankle sprain represents more than 75% of acute ankle injuries,² which an isolated injury to the anterior talofibular ligament occurs at 66%, while injuries to both the anterior talofibular ligament and calcaneofibular ligament concurrently occur at 20%.⁴ Mechanisms of injury typically involve a combination of sudden excessive ankle inversion, internal rotation, with/without plantar flexion, which put these ligaments into great stress.⁵ For instance, this includes landing on an inverted surface (e.g. an opponent’s foot), which is a frequently observed precipitating event for lateral ankle sprains in basketball and volleyball,^6,7 or abrupt lateral cutting motions in tennis.⁵

Common methods of preventing ankle sprains include external ankle supports, such as athletic taping, braces, and high-top shoes.^8
–10 In a recent systematic review and meta-analysis by Barelds et al. in 2018,⁸ ankle braces have been shown to be effective in reducing the incidence of ankle sprains, especially in athletes with a history of recurrent ankle sprains. Conversely, evidence to support the use of high-top shoes and ankle taping in preventing ankle sprains has not been fully established.^11,12

Compared to ankle taping and ankle braces, shoewear compliance may be higher since no additional adjuncts are involved. If simple measures like these are effective, this may provide a better alternative to prevent ankle sprain injuries. Multiple studies related to the effects of shoe collar height and ankle sprain mechanics have been performed. However, there is a lack of consistency in terms of study design, intervention, and outcome measures. Systematic review and meta-analysis were not applicable due to the heterogeneity of studies, and mixed results from these studies can be confusing to interpret, making further research on this topic difficult as a result of lack of future direction. With this said, this remains a controversial yet important topic because at least some studies have shown that ankle protection provided by high-top shoes may not be significant and may even be at the expense of athletic performance due to reduced agility.^13,14 Therefore, our aim of this review is to summarize the existing literature on this topic, to provide a clearer picture to guide future research on this controversial matter.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted to include as many relevant studies as possible, and synthesis of study results was then performed in a narrative manner.

Eligibility criteria

Full-text articles identified via English titles from peer-reviewed journals were retrieved and considered based on the following inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Inclusion criteria

Studies including investigation on the effects of shoe type on ankle function or injuries.

Studies reporting outcomes related to ankle range of motion (ROM) kinematics and ankle muscle activity.

Exclusion criteria

Studies involving subjects who had neuromuscular or other coexisting comorbidities that predisposed them to ankle sprains.

Studies focusing primarily on treatments instead of prevention.

Non-English, nonhuman, or commentary articles

Literature search

A systematic search and screening were conducted independently by two authors (JHCL and PC) using the following electronic databases, EMBASE via Ovid, Medline via Ovid, PubMed, and SPORTDiscus via EBSCOhost from inception to September 2019.

Search strategy and study selection

Keywords in our search included ankle, sprain, injury, instability, shoes, shoe collar height, high top (or high-top), low top (or low-top), and prevention, with one of the search strategies applied being presented in Tables 1 –4. Our search strategy was cross-checked by running additional searches from Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR). All titles and abstracts retrieved were read and assessed based on the eligibility criteria. Full texts were obtained for those papers not excluded at the abstract reviewing phase. References of each study were also screened to identify any further studies not retrieved from the initial search. Any discordance between the two reviewers was discussed until consensus was reached.

Table 1.

Search strategy on EMBASE (Ovid).^a

Searches		Results
1	ankle.af	93,982
2	sprain.af	6980
3	injury.af	148,3875
4	instability.af	160,955
5	shoes.af	5957
6	shoe collar height.af	2
7	(high top or high-top).af	125
8	(low top or low-top).af	28
9	prevention.af	1,940,022
10	2 or 3 or 4	1,625,091
11	5 or 6 or 7 or 8	6079
12	1 and 9 and 10 and 11	88
13	limit 12 to (English language and full text)	33

^a Search performed on September 10, 2019.

Table 2.

Search strategy on MEDLINE (Ovid).^a

Searches		Results
1	ankle.af	62,249
2	sprain.af	2221
3	injury.af	645,881
4	instability.af	99,462
5	shoes.af	7862
6	shoe collar height.af	2
7	(high top or high-top).af	67
8	(low top or low-top).af	19
9	prevention.af	641,804
10	2 or 3 or 4	737,224
11	5 or 6 or 7 or 8	7916
12	1 and 9 and 10 and 11	39
13	limit 12 to (English language and full text)	20

^a Search performed on September 10, 2019.

Table 3.

Search strategy on PubMed.^a

Searches		Results
1	ankle	70,436
2	sprain	20,532
3	injury	1,351,536
4	instability	121,426
5	shoes	8508
6	shoe collar height	12
7	high top or high-top	27,700
8	low top or low-top	14,605
9	prevention	1,676,977
10	2 or 3 or 4	1,451,492
11	5 or 6 or 7 or 8	43,400
12	1 and 9 and 10 and 11	155
13	limit 12 to (English language and full text)	140

^a Search performed on September 10, 2019.

Table 4.

Search Strategy on SPORTDiscus (EBSCOhost).^a

Searches		Results
1	ankle	21,599
2	sprain	4155
3	injury	142,066
4	instability	7396
5	shoes	14,426
6	shoe collar height	14,426
7	high top or high-top	2
8	low top or low-top	1,506,512
9	prevention	697,798
10	2 or 3 or 4	7859
11	5 or 6 or 7 or 8	9953
12	1 and 9 and 10 and 11	120
13	limit 12 to (English language and full text and references available and peer reviewed)	14

^a Search performed on September 10, 2019.

Data extraction and synthesis

Data extraction was performed independently by JHCL and PC and was reviewed by SKKL. Extracted data included authors, study title, design, year of publication, sampling procedure, and sample characteristics (number of participants, gender, average age, and participating sports if provided). Methodology which included shoe types, relevant outcome parameters, reliability, and validity, discussions, and main findings were also reported according to PRISMA guidelines.¹⁵ Measured outcome parameters of interest in the shoe type or collar height study were broadly categorized into ankle kinematics^{13,14,16

–20} and ankle muscle function.^{14,16,19

–23}

In terms of ankle kinematics, variables included active ankle ROM during ankle perturbation simulation or performance testing in sagittal plane (plantar-/dorsiflexion), frontal plane (inversion/eversion), and/or transverse plane (abduction/adduction). Passive non-weight ankle ROM before and after exercise was also included. Other included kinematic variables were mainly related to ankle inversion velocity.

In terms of ankle muscle function, variables included functional eversion ankle strength (i.e. resistance to inversion moment), inversion ankle strength (i.e. resistance to eversion moments), pre-activation timing and electromyography (EMG) amplitude of ankle evertor muscles (i.e. tibialis anterior, peroneal longus and brevis), as well as parameters indicative of athletic performance (e.g. time to complete performance test, jumping height).

Methodological quality assessment of evidence

The quality of each study was assessed and graded independently by two authors according to the modified Downs and Black checklist as this has been thoroughly validated for both randomized controlled and noncontrolled trials.²⁴ Downs and Black score ranges were given corresponding quality levels as reported: excellent (26–28), good (20–25), fair (15–19), and poor (<15), with full score being 28. The reviewers’ results were compared, and discrepancies were resolved in consensus meeting.

Results

The systematic search resulted in 220 articles, with 207 yielded from the electronic search and 13 identified through reference tracking. After duplicates were removed, a total of 144 articles remained and were screened for possible inclusion. Of the 144 articles screened, 50 relevant articles were identified. After the application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, there were 10 articles ultimately included in this systematic review (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Flowchart of study inclusion and exclusion.

Study selection and characteristics

A total of 171 participants (151 males, 20 females) were involved in the included studies of this systematic review. Their study characteristics were summarized in Table 5. Mean age of subjects was 18.7. Types of sports, if specified, included basketball (20.5%), football (18.7%), and netball (6.5%).

Table 5.

Study characteristics of included studies: outcome of interest and subject demographics.

Author	Outcome of interest in shoe collar height study	Sample size (M:F)	Subjects	Age
Ashton-Miller et al.²¹	Functional eversion ankle strength (resistance to inversion moments)	20 (20:0)	Healthy young adult men	24.4 ± 3.4
Brizuela et al.¹³	Active ankle ROM in frontal plane	8 (8:0)	Basketball players	N/A
Fu et al.¹⁴	Active ankle ROM in sagittal planeEvertor muscle activation onset and amplitude	13 (13:0)	Physical education students	21.3 ± 1.2
Lam et al.¹⁶	Active ankle ROM in all three sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes	15 (15:0)	University basketball players	24.3 ± 1.2
Ottaviani et al.²²	Resistance to inversion and eversion moment	20 (20:0)	Healthy young adult men	22.6 ± 3.1
Ottaviani et al.²³	Resistance to inversion and eversion moment	20 (0:20)	Healthy young adult women	23.3 ± 5.1
Pizac et al.¹⁷	Passive ankle ROM in frontal plane before and after exercise	32 (32:0)	High school interscholastic football players	15.8 ± 1.0
Ricard et al.¹⁸	Active ankle ROM in frontal plane and rate of ankle inversion	20 (20:0)	Physical education students	20.5 ± 3.47
Vanwanseele et al.¹⁹	Active ankle ROM in all three sagittal, frontal and transverse planes, ankle inversion velocity Ankle moments in sagittal and frontal planes	11 (N/A)	Sports Institute netball players	18.3 ± 1.8
Yang et al.²⁰	Active ankle ROM in sagittal plane Peak plantar flexion moment	12 (12:0)	Collegiate basketball players	23.7 ± 0.6

ROM: range of motion.

Types of Shoes

Each of the 10 included studies essentially involved comparison between high-top and low-top athletic shoes, although many either did not provide their definition of high- and low top in detail or the definitions were inconsistent among which they were stated (Table 6). While Fu et al. measured the difference in shoe collar height between high- and low top to be 6 cm,¹⁴ Yang et al. and Lam et al. measured a difference of 4.3 cm and 8.5 cm, respectively.^16,20 Ottaviani et al. and Ashton-Miller et al. used three-quarter top (¾-top) to compare against low-top shoes.^21
–23 Whether ¾-top shoes were the same as high-top shoes was not mentioned. Brizuela et al. explored the comparison between high-support and low-support shoes.¹³ High-support shoes were described as high-top shoes with additional heel counter with a rearfoot counter lacing system while low-support shoes were low-top shoes without. Finally, Pizac et al. on the other hand examined high-top versus mid-/low-top football cleats, although of which the collar height difference was not mentioned.¹⁷

Table 6.

Study characteristics of included studies: methods and results.^a

Author	Testing protocol	Shoe type comparison (collar height difference)	Main results
			Ankle kinematics	Ankle muscle function
			ROM	Ankle moments	Evertor muscle activation and EMG amplitude	Athletic performance parameters
Ashton-Miller et al.²¹	Unipedal strength test	¾-top versus LS (N/A)	/	+ Resistance to inversion moment (eversion strength) (p = 0.012)	/	/
Brizuela et al.¹³	Motion analysis on obstacle running and jumping performance test	High support^b versus low support (N/A)	+ Reduced eversion and plantarflexion (p = 0.0014)	/	/	- Reduced jumping height (p < 0.001) - Increased time required to complete circuit (p = 0.048)
Brizuela et al.¹³		High support^b versus low support (N/A)	- Increased inversion upon landing (p = 0.012)	/	/
Fu et al.¹⁴	Motion analysis and EMG in drop landing on tilted platform	HS versus LS (6 cm)	= No difference in all kinematic parameters	/	- Delayed TA and PB pre-activation onset (p = 0.047, 0.048) - Reduced EMG amplitude of TA, PL, and PB (p = 0.035, 0.042, 0.046)	/
Lam et al.¹⁶	Motion analysis on isolated cutting movement test	HS versus LS (8.5 cm)	+ Reduced inversion and external rotation upon initial contact (p < 0.05)	= No difference in all ankle moment variables	/	= No difference in terms of braking, propulsion, and double-swing phases
Ottaviani et al.²²	Unipedal strength test	¾-top versus LS (N/A)	/	+ Resistance to inversion moment at 0°, 16° plantar flexion (p < 0.001, 0.03)	/	/
Ottaviani et al.²²	Unipedal strength test	¾-top versus LS (N/A)	/	= No difference in resistance to inversion moment at 32° plantar flexion = No difference in resistance to eversion moment	/	/
Ottaviani et al.²³	Unipedal strength test	¾-top versus LS (N/A)	/	+ Resistance to inversion moment at 0°, 32° plantar flexion (p = 0.03, 0.003)	/	/
Pizac et al.¹⁷	Arthrometer, double-, single-leg and tandem stance	High-top cleats versus taped mid-/low-top cleats (N/A)	+ Smaller increase in passive inversion ROM after exercise (p = 0.011)	/	/	/
Pizac et al.¹⁷	Arthrometer, double-, single-leg and tandem stance	High-top cleats versus taped mid-/low-top cleats (N/A)	= No difference on eversion ROM after exercise	/	/	/
Ricard et al.¹⁸	Motion analysis on trapdoor-induced inversion device	HS versus LS (N/A)	+ Reduced inversion, maximal and average rate of inversion (p < 0.001)	/	/	/
Vanwanseele et al.¹⁹	Motion analysis on single-leg landing test	HS versus LS (N/A)	= No difference on all kinematic parameters	- Increased ankle plantar flexion moment (i.e. ankle loading) (p = 0.035)	/	/
Yang et al.²⁰	Weight-bearing dorsiflexion, single- and double-leg jumps	HS versus LS (4.3 cm)	+ Reduced inversion/eversion ROM in static dorsiflexion (p = 0.034)	/	/	/
Yang et al.²⁰	Weight-bearing dorsiflexion, single- and double-leg jumps	HS versus LS (4.3 cm)	= No difference on all other kinematic parameters in single-/double-leg jumps	/	/	/

HS: high-top shoes; LS: low-top shoes; EMG: electromyography; ROM: range of motion; TA: tibialis anterior; PL: peroneus longus; PB: peroneus brevis.

^a Green/+: potential protective effect by high-top shoes; yellow/=: no significant effect; red/-: potential detrimental effect by high-top shoes; /: not studied.

^bHigh-support shoes: high-top shoes with additional heel counter and rearfoot lacing system.

Methodological quality of studies

Results of methodological quality of included studies using the modified Downs and Black checklist were presented in Tables 7 and 8. All 10 studies score within 20–22 (good) out of 28.

Table 7.

Modified Downs and Black checklist scores for included studies (reporting and external validity).^a

Study	Ashton-Miller et al.²¹	Brizuela et al.¹³	Fu et al.¹⁴	Lam et al.¹⁶	Ottaviani et al.²²	Ottaviani et al.²³	Pizac et al.¹⁷	Ricard et al.¹⁸	Vanwanseele et al.¹⁹	Yang et al.²⁰
Reporting
1. Study objectives	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
2. Main outcomes	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
3. Patient characteristics	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
4. Intervention of interest	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
5. Principal confounders	0	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	0	1
6. Main findings	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
7. Estimate of random variability	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
8. Adverse events	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
9. Lost to follow-up	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
10. Probability values	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
External validity
11. To-be-recruited subject representability	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	0	1
12. Recruited subject representability	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
13. Treatment representability	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1

^a Yes = 1, No = 0, Unable to determine = 0 (except “Principal confounders”, in which Yes = 2, Partially = 1, No = 0).

Table 8.

Modified Downs and BLACK checklist scores for included studies (internal validity and power).^a

Study	Ashton-Miller et al.²¹	Brizuela et al.¹³	Fu et al.¹⁴	Lam et al.¹⁶	Ottaviani et al.²²	Ottaviani et al.²³	Pizac et al.¹⁷	Ricard et al.¹⁸	Vanwanseele et al.¹⁹	Yang et al.²⁰
Internal validity—bias
14. Blinded subjects	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
15. Blinded assessors	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
16. Data dredging	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
17. Lengths of follow-up	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
18. Statistical testing	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
19. Intervention compliance	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
20. Outcome measures accuracy	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
Internal validity—confounding (selection bias)
21. Recruitment population	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
22. Recruitment period	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
23. Randomized intervention	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
24. Concealed intervention	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
25. Confounding adjustment	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
26. Lost to follow-up consideration	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
Power
Clinical importance detection	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
Total score	21	21	22	21	22	21	22	21	20	22

^a Yes = 1, No = 0, Unable to determine = 0.

Synthesis of study results

Main findings of each of the 10 included studies were summarized to provide a clearer appraisal of the evidence (Table 6). Outcomes of interest were broadly classified into (i) ankle kinematics and (ii) ankle muscle function.

Shoe collar height and ankle kinematics

Ankle ROM. Seven studies investigated the impact of shoe collar height on ankle ROM kinematics.^{13,14,16

–20} Mixed results were observed between studies involving static and dynamic protocols, but there was an overall trend that high-top shoes can limit ankle ROM in relatively static but not in more dynamic testing.

Two studies using relatively static maneuvers (i.e. weight-bearing dorsiflexion²⁰ and unanticipated drop on trapdoor-induced inversion device¹⁸) revealed reduced plantarflexion, dorsiflexion, and inversion in high-top shoes compared to low-top shoes. However, result was inconsistent among five studies which involved more dynamic protocols (i.e. unanticipated cutting movement,¹⁶ single-/double-leg jump landing,^19,20 drop landing on tilted platform,¹⁴ and obstacle running and jumping performance test¹³). Three of them revealed no high-top shoes related effect,^14,19,20 while the remaining two other studies illustrated that high-top shoes reduced plantar–dorsiflexion, inversion, eversion, and external rotation.^13,16

In addition, one study compared the effect of high-top versus taped low-top football cleats before and after a 2-h practice session.¹⁷ High-top cleats were found to demonstrate a smaller increase in overall passive non-weight-bearing inversion/eversion ROM before and after practice when compared to combined taping and low-top cleats.

Ankle inversion velocity. All other parameters related to ankle inversion velocity in all except one study¹⁸ (i.e. time to maximal ankle inversion angle, rate of ankle inversion, maximal ankle inversion angular velocity) showed no significant difference between high-top and low-top shoes. The only exception was observed in the study by Ricard et al., in which high-top shoes reduced maximal and average rate of inversion by 100° s⁻¹ and 75° s⁻¹ respectively when compared to low-top shoes (p < 0.001).¹⁸

Shoe collar height and ankle muscle function

Seven studies examined the effect of shoe collar height on ankle muscle strength and activity.^{14,16,19

–23} Mixed results were again observed, but there was an overall trend that high-top shoes are associated with greater resistance to inversion moment only in more static but not in dynamic testing. There was at least some evidence that high-top shoes may impede athletic performance.^13,14

Functional ankle strength (i.e. resistance to external moment). In terms of ankle eversion strength (i.e. resistance to external inversion moment), Ashton-Miller et al. found that ¾-top shoes increased such strength by 12% (6 N·m) compared to low-top shoes at 0° and 32° plantar flexion (p = 0.012).²¹ Ottaviani et al. showed similar findings although such effect diminished with increasing plantar flexion from 0° (29.4% difference between high-top and low-top, p < 0.001) to 16° (20.4%, p = 0.003), to 32° (non-significant, p > 0.05),²² or in other words, angles which are associated with higher risk of inversion ankle sprains.

Regarding all other direction of moments, there was no significant difference between high-top and low-top shoes in terms of resistance to eversion moments (i.e. inversion strength),^16,22,23 as well as peak plantar flexion moments in any other movement except lay jump (p = 0.028).²⁰

Pre-activation timing and EMG amplitude of ankle evertor muscles

Fu et al. concluded that high-top shoes were associated with delayed activation time as well as EMG amplitude of evertor muscles relative to low-top shoes (i.e. difference in EMG amplitude between high-top and low-top: tibialis anterior in inversion (F = 4.727, p = 0.035) and combined inversion–plantar flexion (F = 4.782, p = 0.033); peroneus longus (37.2% decrease, F = 4.574, p = 0.042), and peroneus brevis (31.0% decrease, F = 4.539, p = 0.046)).¹⁴ Therefore, high-top shoes may decrease ankle joint stability and increase risk of ankle sprain.

Athletic performance parameters

Brizuela et al. demonstrated that high-top shoes was associated with reduced jumping height (3%, p < 0.0001), increased time required to complete circuit (1%, p = 0.048) compared to low-top shoes, while increasing shock transmission to ankle joint which may be detrimental.¹³ However, Lam et al. found no shoe collar height effect on athletic performance in terms of braking, propulsion, and double-swing phases (p > 0.05).¹⁶ An isolated cutting movement task was used in this latter study while a more lengthy agility course was used by Brizuela et al.

Discussion

Based on the selected studies, there was an overall trend that high-top shoes may alter ankle kinematics and increase resistance to external inversion moments in static maneuvers but not in more dynamic testing protocols, which should be more reflective of actual kinematics of ankle sprains. There was at least some evidence which suggested that high-top shoes might impede athletic performance. These findings may suggest that high-top shoes may not be useful to prevent ankle sprains in the athletic population, and such results were compatible with the inconsistent findings in multiple epidemiological studies that high-top shoes are associated with fewer ankle injuries.^25
–27

Effect on ankle kinematics

In the study by Brizuela et al.,¹³ the high-support shoes being used in this study contained additional structural supports in comparison to those used in other studies. These adjuncts might represent potential confounders if they were used to assess the effect of shoe collar height on ankle kinematics.

Pizac et al. showed that there was a higher sustainability in high-top-related protection of ankle inversion in comparison to taped low-/mid-top cleats after exercise.¹⁷ Whether there was statistically significant comparison of ROM between high-top and low-top cleats without taping, as well as within each pre- and post-exercise session, was however not discussed. It was also important to note that the ROM measured in this study was passive, non-weight-bearing, which might be less reflective of real-life scenario.

Lastly, it was worth mentioning that Vanwanseele et al. applied an in-shoe calcaneal motion device which might better predict actual ankle ROM instead of estimation through tracking external shoe anchors as what most other studies did.¹⁹ Result was consistent with general observations from most studies in this review.

Effect on ankle muscle function

Some might argue that reaction of peroneal muscles is typically too slow to stop sudden inversion from occurring²⁸ and that delayed peroneal muscle activation was inappropriately blamed for sprain accidents. In response to such argument, it would be particularly useful to differentiate neuromuscular activation due to stretch reflex after the impact from pre-landing neuromuscular activation. While the stretch reflex mechanism may indeed be too slow, current literature has demonstrated that strong preparatory co-activation of ankle evertors and invertors prior to landing prevented ankle inversion from exceeding injury threshold. Ashton-Miller et al. concluded that active evertor muscle group can provide the most effective ankle protection when compared to brace and taping, and such activation can provide up to six times the passive resistance that high-top shoes can provide.²¹ There has also been robust data including a meta-analysis which determined that individuals with previous ankle sprain exhibited delayed and smaller peroneal muscle activation, and that deficit was even more evident in patients with chronic ankle instability.^29
–31 In other words, this impaired pre-landing peroneal activation (e.g. from the use of high-top shoes) may potentially put individuals at risk of sustaining ankle sprains.

In this review, two studies concluded that high-top shoes were not effective in increasing ankle joint stability, but might instead induce suboptimal muscular control and impaired functional stability.^14,15 With that said, this would call for further exploration regarding the possibility of ankle neuromuscular adaptation upon long-term use of high-top shoes through more extensive EMG studies.

Overall, there were some shortcomings identified in our included studies. Potential methodological limitations included small sample size, low female ratio, moderate risk of inevitable bias due to lack of blinding of participants and outcome accessors, lack of clarity or absence of adjustment for other confounding factors of ankle sprains, including athlete’s body height and weight, activity level, smoking history, use of long-term medications such as corticosteroids, as well as concomitant use of other ankle protective mechanisms (e.g. ankle proprioceptive training and strengthening programs, athletic taping and braces). All these factors could affect result interpretation.

Review limitation

Several limitations in our review should be noted. In terms of subject demographics, although the mean participant age in the 10 included studies was 18.7 years old, the level of training might vary. This may imply possible deviation from the common mechanisms of ankle sprains. Results should also be interpreted with caution if the findings are to be extrapolated to individuals outside this age range, as the musculoskeletal biomechanical properties may differ among age groups. Moreover, the selected studies had a high male predominance, which might affect applicability to female athletes. A recent meta-analysis by Doherty et al.¹ has suggested female preponderance in ankle sprain injuries.

As described above, heterogeneity was observed in design protocols of simulating ankle sprain mechanism of injury, as well as their corresponding measured outcomes. Regarding the types of intervention, there was also no consensus in the literature on the scientific definition of high-top shoes. Unless specified, it was difficult to gauge the exact difference in collar height between high-top and low-top shoes in most studies. The studies we identified used a variety of athletic shoe brands and designs across a 25-year time span. To name just a few, difference in collar heights, stiffness of materials, and additional supportive adjuncts observed in recent advancements are all variables which made pooling of results in this systematic review difficult.

Finally, publication bias would be expected. Inclusion of only published data as well as limitation of our search to full-text articles in English with electronic access would mean that there might be other relevant studies in other languages, from non-electronic sources, or unpublished data being missed.

Future research direction

This systematic review highlighted the paucity and heterogeneity of studies regarding the effect of shoe collar height on ankle sprain mechanics. To facilitate assessment of new findings based upon existing results, future studies should include consistent and detailed definition of high-top and low-top shoes, particularly the difference in collar height measurement. In terms of testing protocols, those involving more dynamic maneuvers such as controlled landing on inverted surfaces better resemble actual ankle kinematics in ankle sprain injuries than those only involving relatively static balancing on trapdoor devices, and thus can be adopted for reference in future studies. As mentioned by Fu et al.,¹⁸ it would also be helpful to further explore how shoe collar height may influence intrinsic neuromuscular response of ankle evertor muscles. In particular, based on our discussion, the possibility of ankle neuromuscular adaptation upon long-term use of high-top shoes could be addressed through more extensive EMG studies.

Summary

Our review summarized that high-top shoes generally alter ankle biomechanics in static maneuvers but not in more dynamic protocols in athletes. Such results may suggest that high-top shoes may not be as useful to prevent ankle sprains in real-life situation as commonly advertised in the sports community. Further studies with more consistent study interventions and outcome variables are needed to definitively establish the effects of shoe collar height on ankle sprain mechanics in athletes.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs

Jojo Hoi-Ching Lai

Samuel KK Ling

References

Doherty

Delahunt

Caulfield

, et al. The incidence and prevalence of ankle sprain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies. Sports Med 2014; 44(1): 123–140.

Fong

DTP

Hong

Chan

, et al. A systematic review on ankle injury and ankle sprain in sports. Sports Med 2007; 37(1): 73–94.

Dizon

JMR

Reyes

JJB

. A systematic review on the effectiveness of external ankle supports in the prevention of inversion ankle sprains among elite and recreational players. J Sci Med Sport 2010; 13(3): 309–317.

Hubbard

Wikstrom

. Ankle sprain: pathophysiology, predisposing factors, and management strategies. Open Access J Sports Med 2010; 1: 115–122.

Fong

DTP

SCW

Mok

, et al. Kinematics analysis of ankle inversion ligamentous sprain injuries in sports: five cases from televised tennis competitions. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40(11): 2627–2632.

Panagiotakis

Mok

Fong

DTP

, et al. Biomechanical analysis of ankle ligamentous sprain injury cases from televised basketball games: understanding when, how and why ligament failure occurs. J Sci Med Sport 2017; 20(12): 1057–1061.

Reeser

Verhagen

Briner

, et al. Strategies for the prevention of volleyball related injuries. Br J Sports Med 2006; 40(7): 594–599.

Barelds

van den Broek

Huisstede

BMA

. Ankle bracing is effective for primary and secondary prevention of acute ankle injuries in athletes: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Sports Med 2018; 48(12): 2775–2784.

Burks

Bean

Marcus

, et al. Analysis of athletic performance with prophylactic ankle devices. Am J Sports Med 1991; 19(2): 104–106.

10.

McGuine

Hetzel

Wilson

, et al. The effect of lace-up ankle braces on injury rates in high school football players. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40(1): 49–57.

11.

Barrett

Bilisko

. The role of shoes in the prevention of ankle sprains. Sports Med 1995; 20(4): 277–280.

12.

Simpson

DeBusk

Hill

, et al. The role of military footwear and workload on ground reaction forces during a simulated lateral ankle sprain mechanism. Foot 2018; 34: 53–57.

13.

Brizuela

Llana

Ferrandis

, et al. The influence of basketball shoes with increased ankle support on shock attenuation and performance in running and jumping. J Sports Sci 1997; 15(5): 505–515.

14.

Fang

Liu

, et al. The effect of high-top and low-top shoes on ankle inversion kinematics and muscle activation in landing on a tilted surface. J Foot Ankle Res 2014; 7(1). DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-7-14.

15.

Moher

Shamseer

Clarke

, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015; 20(2): DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.

16.

Lam

GWK

Park

Lee

, et al. Shoe collar height effect on athletic performance, ankle joint kinematics and kinetics during unanticipated maximum-effort side-cutting performance. J Sports Sci 2015; 33(16): 1738–1749.

17.

Pizac

Swanik

Glutting

, et al. Evaluating postural control and ankle laxity between taping and high-top cleats in high school football players. J Sport Rehabil 2018; 27(2): 111–117.

18.

Ricard

Schulties

Saret

. Effects of high-top and low-top shoes on ankle inversion. J Athl Train 2000; 35(1): 38–43.

19.

Vanwanseele

Stuelcken

Greene

, et al. The effect of external ankle support on knee and ankle joint movement and loading in netball players. J Sci Med Sport 2014; 17(5): 511–515.

20.

Yang

Fang

Zhang

, et al.

Shoe collar height influence ankle joint kinematics and kinetics in sagittal plane maneuvers?

J Sports Sci Med 2017; 16: 543–550.

21.

Ashton-Miller

Ottaviani

Hutchinson

, et al. What best protects the inverted weightbearing ankle against further inversion? Evertor muscle strength compares favorably with shoe height, athletic tape, and three orthoses. Am J Sport Med 1996; 24(6): 800–809.

22.

Ottaviani

Ashton-Miller

Kothari

, et al. Basketball shoe height and the maximal muscular resistance to applied ankle inversion and eversion moments. Am J Sports Med 1995; 23(4): 418–423.

23.

Ottaviani

Ashton-Miller

Wojtys

. Inversion and eversion strengths in the weightbearing ankle of young women effects of plantar flexion and basketball shoe height. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24(6): 800–809.

24.

Downs

Black

. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Commun H 1998; 52(6): 377–384.

25.

Cuñado-González

Martín-Pintado-Zugasti

Rodríguez-Fernández

ÁL

. Prevalence and factors associated with injuries in elite Spanish volleyball. J Sport Rehabil 2018; 28(8): 796–802.

26.

Garrick

Requa

. Role of external support in the prevention of ankle sprains. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1973; 5(3): 200–203.

27.

Iacovelli

Yang

Thomas

, et al. The effect of field condition and shoe type on lower extremity injuries in American football. Br J Sport Med 2013; 47(12): 789–793.

28.

Konradsen

Voigt

Højsgaard

. Ankle inversion injuries: the role of the dynamic defense mechanism. Am J Sports Med 1997; 25(1): 54–58.

29.

DeMers

Hicks

Delp

. Preparatory co-activation of the ankle muscles may prevent ankle inversion injuries. J Biomech 2017; 52: 17–23.

30.

Hoch

McKeon

. Peroneal reaction time after ankle sprain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2014; 46(3): 546–556.

31.

O’Shea

Flavin

Blake

, et al. P37 Peroneal muscle activation in chronic ankle instability. Br J Sport Med 2017; 51: A27.

The effects of shoe collar height on ankle sprain mechanics in athletes: A review of literature

Abstract

Background:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

The Translational Potential of this Article:

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Literature search

Search strategy and study selection

Data extraction and synthesis

Methodological quality assessment of evidence

Results

Study selection and characteristics

Types of Shoes

Methodological quality of studies

Synthesis of study results

Shoe collar height and ankle kinematics

Shoe collar height and ankle muscle function

Pre-activation timing and EMG amplitude of ankle evertor muscles

Athletic performance parameters

Discussion

Effect on ankle kinematics

Effect on ankle muscle function

Review limitation

Future research direction

Summary

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iDs

References