Fluidic circuits offer an effective route to electronics-free control in soft robots. However, limited tunability of hysteresis in existing fluidic valves constrains their ability to exploit the analog characteristics of pressure inputs. As a result, many fluidic circuits rely on digital control with multiple external inputs, increasing system complexity. Here, we develop a hysteresis-guided pressure-threshold encoder (PTE) composed of hysteresis-tunable valves (HTVs) to convert a programmed pressure input into multiple digital outputs. By customizing the hysteresis behavior of the HTVs, the PTE provides a well-defined resolution for detecting variations in the input pressure. The PTE allows two modes of input-pressure programming: automated sequencing with an electronic device and manual sequencing with a mechanical pressure regulator. Integration of the PTE as an input module within digital fluidic circuits verifies its scalability and compatibility. Experimental demonstrations on soft joints and soft robotic hands confirm that the PTE enables multiactuator control using minimal inputs. Overall, this work provides an effective encoding method to reduce the number of external pressure lines from n to 2, providing a new approach for compact, electronics-free, and scalable control systems in soft robotics.
SuH, HouX, ZhangX, et al.Pneumatic soft robots: Challenges and benefits. Actuators2022;11(3):92; doi: 10.3390/act11030092
2.
JungY, KwonK, LeeJ, et al.Untethered soft actuators for soft standalone robotics. Nat Commun2024;15(1):3510; doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47639-0
3.
LinB, SongS, WangJ. Variable stiffness methods of flexible robots for minimally invasive surgery: A review. Biomimetic Intelligence and Robotics2024;4(3):100168; doi: 10.1016/j.birob.2024.100168
4.
DagninoG, KundratD. Robot-assistive minimally invasive surgery: Trends and future directions. Int J Intell Robot Appl2024;8(4):812–826; doi: 10.1007/s41315-024-00341-2
5.
MilanaE. Soft robotics for infrastructure protection. Front Robot AI2022;9:1026891; doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.1026891
6.
WangX, WeiR, ChenZ, et al.Bioinspired intelligent soft robotics: From multidisciplinary integration to next‐generation intelligence. Adv Sci (Weinh)2025;12(32):e06296; doi: 10.1002/advs.202506296
7.
GhobadiN, SepehriN, KinsnerW, et al.Beyond human touch: Integrating soft robotics with environmental interaction for advanced applications. Actuators2024;13(12):507; doi: 10.3390/act13120507
8.
SarkerA, Ul IslamT, IslamM. A review on recent trends of bioinspired soft robotics: Actuators, control methods, materials selection, sensors, challenges, and future prospects. Advanced Intelligent Systems2025;7(3):2400414; doi: 10.1002/aisy.202400414
9.
WangY, WangY, MushtaqRT, et al.Advancements in soft robotics: A comprehensive review on actuation methods, materials, and applications. Polymers (Basel)2024;16(8):1087; doi: 10.3390/polym16081087
10.
WangC, ZhaoT, ChengW, et al.Microfluidic strategies in soft robotics: Actuators, control systems, and pumps. Device2024;2(9):100551; doi: 10.1016/j.device.2024.100551
11.
KulkarniM, EdwardS, GoleckiT, et al.Soft robots built for extreme environments. Soft Sci2025;5(1):12; doi: 10.20517/ss.2023.51
12.
MosadeghB, KuoC-H, TungY-C, et al.Integrated elastomeric components for autonomous regulation of sequential and oscillatory flow switching in microfluidic devices. Nat Phys2010;6(6):433–437; doi: 10.1038/NPHYS1637
13.
RheeM, BurnsMA. Microfluidic pneumatic logic circuits and digital pneumatic microprocessors for integrated microfluidic systems. Lab Chip2009;9(21):3131–3143; doi: 10.1039/b904354c
14.
ZhangQ, ZhangM, DjeghlafL, et al.Logic digital fluidic in miniaturized functional devices: Perspective to the next generation of microfluidic lab-on-chips. Electrophoresis2017;38(7):953–976; doi: 10.1002/elps.201600429
15.
UngerMA, ChouHP, ThorsenT, et al.Monolithic microfabricated valves and pumps by multilayer soft lithography. Science2000;288(5463):113–116; doi: 10.1126/science.288.5463.113
16.
RothemundP, AinlaA, BeldingL, et al.A soft, bistable valve for autonomous control of soft actuators. Sci Robot2018;3(16):eaar7986; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aar7986
17.
DeckerCJ, JiangHJ, NemitzMP, et al.Programmable soft valves for digital and analog control. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2022;119(40):e2205922119; doi: 10.1073/pnas.2205922119
18.
PrestonDJ, RothemundP, JiangHJ, et al.Digital logic for soft devices. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2019;116(16):7750–7759; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820672116
19.
LeeW-K, PrestonDJ, NemitzMP, et al.A buckling-sheet ring oscillator for electronics-free, multimodal locomotion. Sci Robot2022;7(63):eabg5812; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abg5812
20.
NagarkarA, LeeW-K, PrestonDJ, et al.Elastic-instability–enabled locomotion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2021;118(8):e2013801118; doi: 10.1073/pnas.2013801118
21.
TraczJA, WilleL, PathirajaD, et al.Tube-balloon logic for the exploration of fluidic control elements. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2022;7(2):5483–5488; doi: 10.1109/LRA.2022.3156174
22.
MousaM, RezanejadA, GorissenB, et al.Frequency‐controlled fluidic oscillators for soft robots. Adv Sci (Weinh)2024;11(43):e2408879; doi: 10.1002/advs.202408879
PrestonDJ, JiangHJ, SanchezV, et al.A soft ring oscillator. Sci Robot2019;4(31):eaaw5496; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aaw5496
25.
StanleyAA, RobyES, KellerSJ. High-speed fluidic processing circuits for dynamic control of haptic and robotic systems. Sci Adv2024;10(14):eadl3014; doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adl3014
26.
Van LaakeLC, De VriesJ, Malek KaniS, et al.A fluidic relaxation oscillator for reprogrammable sequential actuation in soft robots. Matter2022;5(9):2898–2917; doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2022.06.002
27.
LingZ, JiaA, FuY, et al.Fluidic oscillation-based pneumatic actuation for soft locomotion and grasping. Soft Robot2025;12(2):290–301.
28.
WangS, HeL, YaoY, et al.A toolbox for designing 3D‐printing‐ready pneumatic circuits for controlling soft robots. Advanced Intelligent Systems2023;5(12):2300394; doi: 10.1002/aisy.202300394
29.
BartlettNW, BeckerKP, WoodRJ. A fluidic demultiplexer for controlling large arrays of soft actuators. Soft Matter2020;16(25):5871–5877; doi: 10.1039/C9SM02502B
30.
HoangS, KarydisK, BriskP, et al.A pneumatic random-access memory for controlling soft robots. PLoS One2021;16(7):e0254524; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254524
31.
DrotmanD, JadhavS, SharpD, et al.Electronics-free pneumatic circuits for controlling soft-legged robots. Sci Robot2021;6(51):eaay2627; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aay2627
32.
YueT, LuC, TangK, et al.Embodying soft robots with octopus-inspired hierarchical suction intelligence. Sci Robot2025;10(102):eadr4264; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.adr4264
33.
PontinM, DamianDD. Multimodal soft valve enables physical responsiveness for preemptive resilience of soft robots. Sci Robot2024;9(92):eadk9978; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.adk9978
34.
RajappanA, LiuZ, YapTF, et al.Embedded fluidic sensing and control with soft open‐cell foams. Adv Funct Materials2024;34(41):2403379; doi: 10.1002/adfm.202403379
35.
ZhaiY, TolleyMT. Electronics-free 3D-printed soft swimming robot with pneumatic oscillating control for efficient undulating locomotion. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2025;10(8):7891–7898; doi: 10.1109/LRA.2025.3579015
36.
ZhaiY, YanJ, De BoerA, et al.Monolithic desktop digital fabrication of autonomous walking robots. Advanced Intelligent Systems2025;7(5):2400876; doi: 10.1002/aisy.202400876
37.
ChenG, LongY, YaoS, et al.A non-electrical pneumatic hybrid oscillator for high-frequency multimodal robotic locomotion. Nat Commun2025;16(1):1449; doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-56704-1
38.
ConradS, TeichmannJ, AuthP, et al.3D-printed digital pneumatic logic for the control of soft robotic actuators. Sci Robot2024;9(86):eadh4060; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.adh4060
39.
HubbardJD, AcevedoR, EdwardsKM, et al.Fully 3D-printed soft robots with integrated fluidic circuitry. Sci Adv2021;7(29):eabe5257; doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe5257
40.
ZhaiY, De BoerA, YanJ, et al.Desktop fabrication of monolithic soft robotic devices with embedded fluidic control circuits. Sci Robot2023;8(79):eadg3792; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.adg3792
41.
JadhavS, GlickPE, IshidaM, et al.Scalable fluidic matrix circuits for controlling large arrays of individually addressable actuators. Advanced Intelligent Systems2023;5(8):2300011; doi: 10.1002/aisy.202300011
42.
YangY, ZhaoY, ZhongS, et al.A multimode flow control valve for simplifying the driving system of pneumatic soft robots. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2021;68(12):12472–12481; doi: 10.1109/TIE.2020.3038085
43.
WangS, HeL, MaiolinoP. Design and characterization of a 3D-printed pneumatically-driven bistable valve with tunable characteristics. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2022;7(1):112–119; doi: 10.1109/LRA.2021.3118086
44.
JinL, ForteAE, BertoldiK. Mechanical valves for on‐board flow control of inflatable robots. Adv Sci (Weinh)2021;8(21):e2101941; doi: 10.1002/advs.202101941
45.
PicellaS, Van RietCM, OverveldeJTB. Pneumatic coding blocks enable programmability of electronics-free fluidic soft robots. Sci Adv2024;10(51):eadr2433; doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adr2433
46.
ZhangY, WangT, HeW, et al.Human-powered master controllers for reconfigurable fluidic soft robots. Soft Robot2023;10(6):1126–1136; doi: 10.1089/soro.2022.0077
47.
AlùA, ArrietaAF, DottoreED, et al.Roadmap on embodying mechano-intelligence and computing in functional materials and structures. Smart Mater Struct2025;34(6):e063501; doi: 10.1088/1361-665X/adb7aa
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
