Soft robotics solutions to unmet clinical needs represent an emergent disruptive technology. However, clear guidelines on the selection of sterilization methods that consider the preservation of essential physical and functional characteristics of such materials are presently lacking. We reviewed 76 studies that assessed the morphological, mechanical, and functional impact of sterilization on chemically stable and stimuli-responsive hydrogels and polymers. Gamma irradiation was well-tolerated in both stable and stimuli-responsive polymers and conferred additional beneficial material properties. Steam sterilization was suitable for most hydrogels and stimuli-responsive polymers, whereas ethylene oxide sterilization produced mixed effects in stable polymers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MorganAA, AbdiJ, SyedMAQ, et al.Robots in healthcare: A scoping review. Curr Robot Rep2022;3(4):271–280; doi: 10.1007/s43154-022-00095-4
2.
PreisingB, HsiaTC, MittelstadtB. A literature review: Robots in medicine. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag1991;10(2):13–22; doi: 10.1109/51.82001
3.
RusD, TolleyMT. Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature2015;521(7553):467–475; doi: 10.1038/nature14543
4.
PaternòL, LorenzonL. Soft robotics in wearable and implantable medical applications: Translational challenges and future outlooks. Front Robot AI2023;10:1243121; doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1075634
5.
RodrigueH, KimJ. Soft actuators in surgical robotics: A state-of-the-art review. Intel Serv Robotics2024;17(1):3–17; doi: 10.1007/s11370-023-00506-1
6.
JungY, KwonK, LeeJ, et al.Untethered soft actuators for soft standalone robotics. Nat Commun2024;15(1):3510; doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47639-0
7.
ShenZ, ChenF, ZhuX, et al.Stimuli-responsive functional materials for soft robotics. J Mater Chem B2020;8(39):8972–8991; doi: 10.1039/d0tb01585g
8.
BanerjeeH, SuhailM, RenH. Hydrogel actuators and sensors for biomedical soft robots: Brief overview with impending challenges. Biomimetics (Basel)2018;3(3):15; doi: 10.3390/biomimetics3030015
TipnisNP, BurgessDJ. Sterilization of implantable polymer-based medical devices: A review. Int J Pharm2018;544(2):455–460; doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.12.003
14.
GrzelakAW, JeffkinsS, LuoL, et al.Impact of X‐ray irradiation as an equivalent alternative to gamma for sterilization of single‐use bioprocessing polymers. Biotechnol Prog2023;39(4):e3339; doi: 10.1002/btpr.3339
15.
MalinowskiM. Using X-ray technology to sterilize medical devices. Ajbsr2021;12(3):272–276; doi: 10.34297/ajbsr.2021.12.001755
16.
ToldR, UjfalusiZ, PentekA, et al.A state-of-the-art guide to the sterilization of thermoplastic polymers and resin materials used in the additive manufacturing of medical devices. Materials & Design2022;223:111119; doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111119
17.
WallaceCA. New developments in disinfection and sterilization. Am J Infect Control2016;44(Suppl 5):e23–e27; doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.02.022
18.
BekeschusS, KramerA, SuffrediniE, et al.Gas plasma technology—An asset to healthcare during viral pandemics such as the COVID-19 crisis? IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci2020;4(4):391–399; doi: 10.1109/TRPMS.2020.3002658
AverbeckSR, XuD, MurphyBB, et al.Stability of Ti3C2Tx MXene films and devices under clinical sterilization processes. ACS Nano2023;17(10):9442–9454; doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c01525
21.
IqbalZ, MosesW, KimS, et al.Sterilization effects on ultrathin film polymer coatings for silicon-based implantable medical devices. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater2018;106(6):2327–2336; doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34039
22.
KilpadiDV, JohnstonMS, FergusonDE, et al.The effect of solvent extraction and sterilization procedure on the tissue response to Dacron® Velour. Biomaterials1999;20(2):129–136; doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(98)90132-6
23.
HaugenHJ, BrunnerM, PellkoferF, et al.Effect of different Γ‐irradiation doses on cytotoxicity and material properties of porous polyether‐urethane polymer. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater2007;80B(2):415–423; doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30612
24.
AbrahamGA, FrontiniPM, CuadradoTR. Physical and mechanical behavior of sterilized biomedical segmented polyurethanes. J Appl Polym Sci1998;65(6); doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970808)65:6%3C1193::AID-APP15%3E3.0.CO;2-V
25.
GibbA, MobasseriSA, DownesS, et al.Medical grade sterilization affects synthetic polymer film properties intended for peripheral nerve repair: An in vitro study. J Mater Sci Mater Med2013;24(3):701–711; doi: 10.1007/s10856-012-4821-1
26.
NuutinenJ-P, ClercC, VirtaT, et al.Effect of gamma, ethylene oxide, electron beam, and plasma sterilization on the behaviour of SR-PLLA fibres in vitro. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed2002;13(12):1325–1336; doi: 10.1163/15685620260449723
27.
SinghB, VarshneyL, SharmaV. Design of sterile mucoadhesive hydrogels for use in drug delivery: Effect of radiation on network structure. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces2014;121:230–237; doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.06.020
28.
AdemE, Angulo-CerveraE, González-JiménezA, et al.Effect of dose and temperature on the physical properties of an aliphatic thermoplastic polyurethane irradiated with an electron beam. Radiation Physics and Chemistry2015;112:61–70; doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.03.017
29.
ChaudharyN, KoirySP, SinghA, et al.Electron beam induced modifications in flexible biaxially oriented polyethylene terephthalate sheets: Improved mechanical and electrical properties. Mater Chem Phys2017;189:237–244; doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.12.054
30.
GreenRA, MatteucciPB, HassaratiRT, et al.Performance of conducting polymer electrodes for stimulating neuroprosthetics. J Neural Eng2013;10(1):16009; doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/1/016009
31.
EdlundU, AlbertssonA-C, SinghSK, et al.Sterilization, storage stability and in vivo biocompatibility of poly(trimethylene carbonate)/poly(adipic anhydride) blends. Biomaterials2000;21(9):945–955; doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(99)00268-9
32.
San JuanA, MontembaultA, GilletD, et al.Degradation of chitosan-based materials after different sterilization treatments. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng2012;31(1):12007; doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/31/1/012007
33.
Eljarrat‐BinstockE, BentolilaA, KumarN, et al.Preparation, characterization, and Sterilization of Hydrogel Sponges for Iontophoretic Drug‐delivery Use. Polymers for Advanced Techs2007;18(9):720–730; doi: 10.1002/pat.948
34.
Rodríguez‐RodríguezR, Velasquillo‐MartínezC, KnauthP, et al.Sterilized chitosan‐based composite hydrogels: Physicochemical characterization and in vitro cytotoxicity. J Biomedical Materials Res2020;108(1):81–93; doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36794
35.
JiménezA, ZhangJ, MatthewsMA. Evaluation of CO2-based cold sterilization of a model hydrogel. Biotechnol Bioeng2008;101(6):1344–1352; doi: 10.1002/bit.21983
36.
AcevedoCA, SomozaRA, Weinstein-OppenheimerC, et al.Improvement of human skin cell growth by radiation-induced modifications of a Ge/Ch/Ha scaffold. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng2013;36(3):317–324; doi: 10.1007/s00449-012-0786-1
37.
ChernonosovaVS, KuzminIE, ShundrinaIK, et al.Effect of sterilization methods on Electrospun scaffolds produced from blend of polyurethane with Gelatin. J Funct Biomater2023;14(2):70; doi: 10.3390/jfb14020070
38.
de CassanD, HoheiselAL, GlasmacherB, et al.Impact of sterilization by electron beam, gamma radiation and X-rays on Electrospun poly-(ε-caprolactone) Fiber mats. J Mater Sci Mater Med2019;30(4):42; doi: 10.1007/s10856-019-6245-7
39.
DelgadoLM, FullerK, ZeugolisDI. Influence of cross-linking method and disinfection/sterilization treatment on the structural, biophysical, biochemical, and biological properties of collagen-based devices. ACS Biomater Sci Eng2018;4(8):2739–2747; doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00052
40.
JainS, YassinMA, FuocoT, et al.Understanding of how the properties of medical grade lactide based copolymer scaffolds influence adipose tissue regeneration: Sterilization and a systematic in vitro assessment. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2021;124:112020; doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112020
41.
RamarajuH, McAteeAM, AkmanRE, et al.Sterilization effects on poly(glycerol dodecanedioate): A biodegradable shape memory elastomer for biomedical applications. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater2023;111(4):958–970; doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.35205
42.
GhimireA, ZoreO, ThilakarathneV, et al.“Stable-on-the-Table” biosensors: Hemoglobin-poly (acrylic acid) nanogel bioelectrodes with high thermal stability and enhanced electroactivity. Sensors (Basel)2015;15(9):23868–23885; doi: 10.3390/s150923868
43.
LanzalacoS, WeisC, TraegerKA, et al.Mechanical properties of smart polypropylene meshes: Effects of mesh architecture, plasma treatment, thermosensitive coating, and sterilization process. ACS Biomater Sci Eng2023;9(6):3699–3711; doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c00311
44.
ZhangY-Z, BjurstenLM, Freij-LarssonC, et al.Tissue response to commercial silicone and polyurethane elastomers after different sterilization procedures. Biomaterials1996;17(23):2265–2272; doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)00055-5
45.
De NardoL, AlbertiR, CigadaA, et al.Shape memory polymer foams for cerebral aneurysm reparation: Effects of plasma sterilization on physical properties and Cytocompatibility. Acta Biomater2009;5(5):1508–1518; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.11.017
46.
NardoLD, MoscatelliM, SilviF, et al.Chemico-physical modifications induced by plasma and ozone sterilizations on shape memory polyurethane foams. J Mater Sci Mater Med2010;21(7):2067–2078; doi: 10.1007/s10856-010-4082-9
47.
Escudero-CastellanosA, Ocampo-GarcíaBE, Domínguez-GarcíaM, et al.Hydrogels based on poly(ethylene glycol) as scaffolds for tissue engineering application: Biocompatibility assessment and effect of the sterilization process. J Mater Sci Mater Med2016;27(12):176; doi: 10.1007/s10856-016-5793-3
48.
RizwanM, ChanSW, ComeauPA, et al.Effect of sterilization treatment on mechanical properties, biodegradation, bioactivity and printability of GelMA hydrogels. Biomed Mater2020;15(6):65017; doi: 10.1088/1748-605x/aba40c
49.
SceglovsA, WychowaniecJK, SkadinsI, et al.Effect of steam sterilisation on physico-chemical properties of antibacterial covalently cross-linked ε-polylysine/hyaluronic acid hydrogels. Carbohydrate Polymer Technologies and Applications2023;6:100363; doi: 10.1016/j.carpta.2023.100363
50.
StoppelWL, WhiteJC, HoravaSD, et al.Terminal sterilization of alginate hydrogels: Efficacy and impact on mechanical properties. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater2014;102(4):877–884; doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33070
51.
FuP-S, WangJ-C, LaiPF, et al.Effects of gamma radiation on the sterility assurance, antibacterial ability, and biocompatibility of impregnated hydrogel macrosphere protein and drug release. Polymers (Basel)2021;13(6):938; doi: 10.3390/polym13060938
52.
MagdaJ, ChoS-H, StreitmatterS, et al.Effects of gamma rays and neutron irradiation on the glucose response of Boronic acid-containing “smart” hydrogels. Polym Degrad Stab2014;99:219–222; doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.11.002
53.
TipnisN, KastelloriziosM, LegasseyA, et al.Sterilization of drug-loaded composite coatings for implantable glucose biosensors. J Diabetes Sci Technol2021;15(3):646–654; doi: 10.1177/1932296819890620
54.
Op ‘t VeldR C, EerdenM, WagenerADTG, et al.Polyisocyanopeptide hydrogels are effectively sterilized using supercritical carbon dioxide. Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods2020;26(2):132–141; doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2019.0305
55.
BurakJ, GrelaKP, PlutaJ, et al.Impact of sterilisation conditions on the rheological properties of Thermoresponsive Pluronic F-127-based gels for the ophthalmic use. Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica—Drug Research2018;75(2):471–481; doi: 10.32383/appdr/146102
56.
RafaelD, AndradeF, Martinez-TrucharteF, et al.Sterilization procedure for temperature-sensitive hydrogels loaded with silver nanoparticles for clinical applications. Nanomaterials (Basel)2019;9(3):380; doi: 10.3390/nano9030380
BoalMWE, AnastasiouD, TesfaiF, et al.Evaluation of objective tools and artificial intelligence in robotic surgery technical skills assessment: A systematic review. Br J Surg2024;111(1):znad331; doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad331
61.
FeinbergAW. Biological Soft Robotics. Annu Rev Biomed Eng2015;17(1):243–265; doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071114-040632
62.
SakudoA, YagyuY, OnoderaT. Disinfection and sterilization using plasma technology: Fundamentals and future perspectives for biological applications. Int J Mol Sci2019;20(20):5216; doi: 10.3390/ijms20205216
63.
RenZ, ZhangR, Hao SoonR, et al.Softbodied adaptive multimodal locomotion strategies in fluid-filled confined spaces. Sci Adv2021;7(27):eabh2022; doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abh2022
64.
YaoDR, KimI, YinS, et al.Multimodal soft robotic actuation and locomotion. Adv Mater2024;36(19):e2308829; doi: 10.1002/adma.202308829
65.
PereraO, LiyanapathiranaR, GargiuloG, et al.A review of soft robotic actuators and their applications in bioengineering, with an emphasis on HASEL Actuators’ future potential. Actuators2024;13(12):524; doi: 10.3390/act13120524
66.
DudutaM, HajiesmailiE, ZhaoH, et al.Realizing the potential of dielectric elastomer artificial muscles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2019;116(7):2476–2481; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1815053116
67.
DubeA, MalodeSJ, AlodhaybAN, et al.Conducting polymer-based Electrochemical sensors: Progress, challenges, and future perspectives. Talanta Open2025;11:100395; doi: 10.1016/j.talo.2024.100395
68.
MaZ, SameotoD. A review of electrically driven soft actuators for soft robotics. Micromachines (Basel)2022;13(11):1881; doi: 10.3390/mi13111881
69.
WangY, XieZ, HuangH, et al.Pioneering healthcare with soft robotic devices: A review. Smart Med2024;3(1):e20230045; doi: 10.1002/smmd.20230045
70.
ZhangW, NanY, WuZ, et al.Photothermal-Driven liquid crystal elastomers: Materials, alignment and applications. Molecules2022;27(14):4330–4330; doi: 10.3390/molecules27144330
71.
JiangJ, XuS, MaH, et al.Photoresponsive hydrogel-based Soft robot: A Review. Mater Today Bio2023;20:100657; doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100657
72.
HuoY, YangL, XuT, et al.Design, control, and clinical applications of magnetic actuation systems: Challenges and opportunities. Adv Intelligent Systems2025;7(3); doi: 10.1002/aisy.202400403
73.
LiY, FuC, HuangL, et al.Cellulose-based multi-responsive soft robots for programmable smart devices. Chemical Engineering J2024;498:155099; doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.155099
74.
HéRalyF, SikdarA, ChangJ, et al.Humidity-responsive fiber actuators assembled from cellulose nanofibrils. Carbohydr Polym2025;348(Pt A):122785; doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.122785
75.
LiC, LauGC, YuanH, et al.Fast and programmable locomotion of hydrogel-metal hybrids under light and magnetic fields. Sci Robot2020;5(49):eabb9822; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abb9822
76.
SiebenmorgenC, WangC, NavarroLB, et al.Minimally designed thermo-magnetic dual responsive soft robots for complex applications. J Mater Chem B2024;12(22):5339–5349; doi: 10.1039/d3tb02839a
77.
BrooksAK, ChakravartyS, AliM, et al.Kirigami‐Inspired biodesign for applications in healthcare. Adv Mater2022;34(18):e2109550; doi: 10.1002/adma.202109550
78.
SáNchezV, MahadevanK, OhlsonG, et al.3D knitting for pneumatic soft robotics. Adv Funct Mater2023;33(26); doi: 10.1002/adfm.202212541
79.
LiH, ZhaoZ, YangM, et al.Yarn-grouping weaving soft robotics with directional inflation, bilateral bending, and self-sensing for healthcare. Cell Rep Phys Sci2024;5(8):102137–102137; doi: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2024.102137
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
