AI is set to take over some tasks within the decision space that have traditionally been reserved for humans. In return, human decision-makers interacting with AI systems entails rationalization of AI outputs by humans, who may have difficulty forming trust around such AI-generated information. Although a variety of analytical methods have provided some insights into human trust in AI, a more comprehensive understanding of trust may be augmented by generative theories that capture the temporal evolution of trust. Therefore, an open system modeling approach, representing trust as a function of time with a single probability distribution, can potentially improve modeling human trust in an AI system. Results of this study could improve machine behaviors that may help steer a human’s preference to a more Bayesian optimal rationality which is useful in stressful decision-making scenarios.
AgrawalP. M.ShardaR. (2010). Quantum Mechanics and Human Decision Making (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 1653911). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1653911
3.
AshtianiM.AzgomiM. A. (2016). A formulation of computational trust based on quantum decision theory. Information Systems Frontiers, 18(4), 735–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-015-9555-4
4.
BisantzA.LlinasJ.SeongY.FingerR.JianJ.-Y. (2000). Empirical Investigations of Trust-Related Systems Vulnerabilities in Aided, Adversarial Decision Making. STATE UNIV OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO CENTER OF MULTISOURCE INFORMATION FUSION. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA389378
5.
BlairD.ChapaJ. O.CuomoS.HurstJ. (2021). Humans and hardware: An exploration of blended tactical workflows using John Boyd’s OODA loop. In The Conduct of War in the 21st Century. Routledge.
6.
BruzaP. D.HoenkampE. C. (2018). Reinforcing Trust in Autonomous Systems: A Quantum Cognitive Approach. In AbbassH. A.ScholzJ.ReidD. J. (Eds.), Foundations of Trusted Autonomy (pp. 215–224). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64816-3_12
7.
BrynjolfssonE.MitchellT. (2017). What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science, 358(6370), 1530–1534. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8062
8.
BusemeyerJ. R.BruzaP. D. (2014). Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision (Reissue edition). Cambridge University Press.
9.
BusemeyerJ. R.KvamP. D.PleskacT. J. (2020). Comparison of Markov versus quantum dynamical models of human decision making. WIREs Cognitive Science, 11(4), e1526. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1526
10.
DenningP. J.ArquillaJ. (2022). The context problem in artificial intelligence. Communications of the ACM, 65(12), 18–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3567605
11.
FellL.GibsonA.BruzaP.HoyteP. (2020). Human Information Interaction and the Cognitive Predicting Theory of Trust. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (pp. 145–152). Association for Computing Machinery. http://doi.org/10.1145/3343413.3377981
12.
FloridiL. (2013). The Philosophy of Information. OUP Oxford.
13.
FuchsA.PassarellaA.ContiM. (2023). Modeling, Replicating, and Predicting Human Behavior: A Survey. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3580492
14.
GellesR.McElfreshD.MittuA. (2018). Project Report: Perceptions of AI in Hiring. 16.
15.
HestadD. R. (2001). A Discretionary-Mandatory Model as Applied to Network Centric Warfare and Information Operations. NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY CA. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA387764
16.
JiangJ.KahaiS.YangM. (2022). Who needs explanation and when? Juggling explainable AI and user epistemic uncertainty. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 165, 102839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102839
17.
JiangJ.LiuX. (2022). A quantum cognition-based group decision making model considering interference effects in consensus reaching process. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 173, 108705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108705
18.
KahnemanD. (2013). Thinking, Fast and Slow (1st edition). Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
KhrennikovA. (2020). Social Laser Model for the Bandwagon Effect: Generation of Coherent Information Waves. Entropy, 22(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22050559
21.
KvamP. D.BusemeyerJ. R.PleskacT. J. (2021). Temporal oscillations in preference strength provide evidence for an open system model of constructed preference. Scientific Reports, 11(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87659-0
22.
KvamP. D.PleskacT. J.YuS.BusemeyerJ. R. (2015). Interference effects of choice on confidence: Quantum characteristics of evidence accumulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(34), 10645–10650. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1500688112
23.
MarshS.DibbenM. R. (2003). The role of trust in information science and technology. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 465–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370111
24.
Martínez-MartínezI.Sánchez-BurilloE. (2016). Quantum stochastic walks on networks for decision-making. Scientific Reports, 6(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23812
25.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2022). Human-AI Teaming: State-of-the-Art and Research Needs. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26355
26.
ÖztürkD. (2021). What Does Artificial Intelligence Mean for Organizations? A Systematic Review of Organization Studies Research and a Way Forward. In BozkuşS.Kahyaoğlu (Ed.), The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Governance, Economics and Finance, Volume I (pp. 265–289). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6811-8_14
27.
PothosE. M.BusemeyerJ. R. (2022). Quantum Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 749–778.
28.
PothosE. M.WaddupO. J.KouassiP.YearsleyJ. M. (2021). What Is Rational and Irrational in Human Decision Making. Quantum Reports, 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/quantum3010014
29.
SnowL.JainS.KrishnamurthyV. (2022). Lyapunov based Stochastic Stability of Human-Machine Interaction: A Quantum Decision System Approach (arXiv:2204.00059). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.00059
30.
StenholmS.SuominenK.-A. (2005). Quantum Approach to Informatics (1st edition). Wiley-Interscience.
31.
TruebloodJ. S.BusemeyerJ. R. (2010). A Comparison of the Belief-Adjustment Model and the Quantum Inference Model as Explanations of Order Effects in Human Inference. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 32(32), 7.
32.
WaardenburgL.HuysmanM.SergeevaA. V. (2022). In the Land of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man Is King: Knowledge Brokerage in the Age of Learning Algorithms. Organization Science, 33(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1544
33.
WaltherJ. B. (1996). Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001
34.
YukalovV. I.SornetteD. (2016). Quantum probability and quantum decision-making. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2058), 20150100. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0100
35.
ZuboffS. (1989). In The Age Of The Smart Machine: The Future Of Work And Power (Reprint edition). Basic Books.
