Multitasking in Complex Environments: An Attempt to Generalize Individual Differences in Multitasking to a Realistic Task Setting

Abstract

Multitasking is a common feature of many modern work and home environments, and this study investigated the relationship between multitasking performance in two different paradigms: a more controlled task-switching paradigm (TSWP) and a more complex, semi-ecologically valid multitasking paradigm (SynWin). The study also explored whether parallel processors may have performance advantages in a complex dual-task environment. Results showed no significant correlation between individual multitasking efficiency in the TSWP and SynWin paradigms. Additionally, the results indicated that the combination of subtasks was the primary factor affecting performance in dual-task variants of the SynWin, rather than the use of a parallel processing mode. We conclude that there may be constraints with respect to the experimental conditions necessary to generalize findings from controlled multitasking paradigms to semi-ecologically valid tasks scenarios. Future research should prioritize efforts to understand how people multitask in more realistic settings and the underlying cognitive processes involved.

Keywords

Attention Cognition Multitasking

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anwyl-Irvine

A. L.

Massonnié

Flitton

Kirkham

Evershed

J. K.

(2020). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods, 52(1), 388–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x

Balkin

T. J.

Bliese

P. D.

Belenky

Sing

Thorne

D. R.

Thomas

Redmond

D. P.

Russo

Wesensten

N. J.

(2004). Comparative utility of instruments for monitoring sleepiness-related performance decrements in the operational environment. Journal of Sleep Research, 13(3), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2869.2004.00407.x

Brüning

Manzey

(2018). Flexibility of individual multitasking strategies in task-switching with preview: Are preferences for serial versus overlapping task processing dependent on between-task conflict? Psychological Research, 82(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0924-0

Brüning

Mückstein

Manzey

(2020). Multitasking strategies make the difference: Separating processing-code resources boosts multitasking efficiency when individuals prefer to interleave tasks in free concurrent dual tasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000865

Brüning

Reissland

Manzey

(2021). Individual preferences for task coordination strategies in multitasking: Exploring the link between preferred modes of processing and strategies of response organization. Psychological Research, 85(2), 577–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01291-7

Comstock

J. R.

Jr Arnegard

R. J.

(1992). The multi-attribute task battery for human operator workload and strategic behavior research.

Elsmore

T. F.

(1994). SYNWORK1: A PC-based tool for assessment of performance in a simulated work environment. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 26(4), 421–426. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204659

Hambrick

D. Z.

Oswald

F. L.

Darowski

E. S.

Rench

T. A.

Brou

(2010). Predictors of multitasking performance in a synthetic work paradigm. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(8), 1149–1167. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1624

Kiesel

Steinhauser

Wendt

Falkenstein

Jost

Philipp

A. M.

Koch

(2010). Control and interference in task switching--a review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 849–874. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019842

10.

Koch

Poljac

Müller

Kiesel

(2018). Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking-An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research. Psychological Bulletin, 144(6), 557–583. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000144

11.

Lam

T. K.

Vartanian

Hollands

J. G.

(2022). The brain under cognitive workload: Neural networks underlying multitasking performance in the multi-attribute task battery. Neuropsychologia, 174, 108350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108350

12.

Lange

Kühn

Filevich

(2015). "Just Another Tool for Online Studies" (JATOS): An Easy Solution for Setup and Management of Web Servers Supporting Online Studies. PloS One, 10(6), e0130834. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130834

13.

de Leeuw

J. R.

(2015). Jspsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a web browser. Behavior Research Methods, 47(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y

14.

Miller

Durst

(2014). "Just do it when you get a chance": The effects of a background task on primary task performance. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 76(8), 2560–2574. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0730-3

15.

Mittelstädt

Miller

Kiesel

(2018). Trading off switch costs and stimulus availability benefits: An investigation of voluntary task-switching behavior in a predictable dynamic multitasking environment. Memory & Cognition, 46(5), 699–715. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0802-z

16.

Reissland

Manzey

(2016). Serial or overlapping processing in multitasking as individual preference: Effects of stimulus preview on task switching and concurrent dual-task performance. Acta Psychologica, 168, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.04.010

17.

Wickens

C. D.

Hollands

J. G.

Banbury

Parasuraman

(2015). Engineering psychology and human performance. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315665177