Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The guidance provided by the ADA regarding online applications can be unclear and has led to the adoption of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as the standards for assessing online accessibility and achieving ADA compliance. While these standards are helpful, they are not perfect and have faced criticism due to usability concerns. As a result, our objective is to create review heuristics that combine the guidance of WCAG 2.0 and Section 508, which can serve as a practical and effective tool for assessing web ADA compliance. The heuristics function similar to a usability heuristic evaluation, which has been proven successful for decades. This article will first focus on developing the ADA compliance heuristics, then it demonstrates the use of the heuristics.

Keywords

ADA Complaint Heuristic Evaluation Web Accessibility

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alahmadi

Drew

(2017). An evaluation of the accessibility of top-ranking university websites: Accessibility rates from 2005 to 2015. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 21(1), 7–24.

Americans with Disabilities Act Title III Regulations. (2012, March 8). ADA.Gov. https://www.ada.gov/law-and-regs/title-iii-regulations/

Calvo

Seyedarabi

Savva

(2016). Beyond Web Content Accessibility Guidelines: Expert Accessibility Reviews. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-Exclusion, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/3019943.3019955

Gonçalves

Martins

Pereira

Oliveira

M. A.-Y.

Ferreira

J. J. P.

(2013). Enterprise Web Accessibility Levels Amongst the Forbes 250: Where Art Thou O Virtuous Leader? Journal of Business Ethics, 113(2), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1309-3

Harrison

Petrie

(2007). Severity of Usability and Accessibility Problems in eCommerce and eGovernment Websites. In Bryan-Kinns

Blanford

Curzon

Nigay

(Eds.), People and Computers XX — Engage (pp. 255–262). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-664-3_19

Home . (n.d.). Global Partnership for Telehealth. Retrieved March 6, 2023, from https://gpth.org/

McKibben

W. B.

Cade

Purgason

L. L.

Wahesh

(2022). How to Conduct a Deductive Content Analysis in Counseling Research. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 13(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2020.1846992

Nielsen

Molich

(1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1145/97243.97281

Pathways. (n.d.). Global Partnership for Telehealth. Retrieved March 6, 2023, from https://gpth.org/products/pathways/

10.

Plainlanguage.gov | Law and requirements . (n.d.). Retrieved March 6, 2023, from https://www.plainlanguage.gov/law/

11.

Rømen

Svanæs

(2012). Validating WCAG versions 1.0 and 2.0 through usability testing with disabled users. Universal Access in the Information Society, 11(4), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-011-0259-3

12.

U.S. Access Board—Revised 508 Standards and 255 Guidelines . (n.d.). Retrieved March 6, 2023, from https://www.access-board.gov/ict/

13.

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 . (n.d.). Retrieved March 6, 2023, from https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/

Enhancing Ada Compliance for Websites and Online Applications: A Heuristic Evaluation Approach

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References