Passive railroad grade crossings fail to provide critical information to motorists about the presence of an approaching train, and pose a greater risk to motorists than do active grade crossings that can include the addition of flashing signal lights and gates. This case study describes the conditions that resulted in a train colliding with a truck on the tracks. In addition to the typical hazards at passive crossings, the subject collision resulted from additional hazards at the site that most likely prevented the truck driver from noticing the sight and sound of the approaching train. These factors are discussed, along with some current efforts to improve safety at railroad crossings.
AureliusJ.P.KoroboN. (1971). The visibility and audibility of trains approaching the rail-highway grade crossings. Report FRA-RP-71-1.
2.
CarrollA.A.MulterJ.MarkosS.H. (1995). Safety of Highway-Railroad Grade Crossings: Use of Auxiliary External Alerting Devices to Improve Locomotive Conspicuity (Report No. DOT/FRA/ORD-95-13). Washington DC: US Department of Transportation.
3.
ChadwickS.G.ZhouN.SaatM.R. (2014). Highway-rail grade crossing safety challenges for shared operations of high-speed passenger and heavy freight rail in the U.S. Safety Science, 68, 128-137.
FambroD.B.CoonerS.A.MessickJ.BartoskewitzR.T. (1995). Enhanced traffic control devices and railroad operations for highway-railroad grade crossings: First year activities. Report No. FHWA/TX-98/1469-1.
7.
Federal Highway Administration. (2009). Stop Sign-Controlled Intersections: Enhanced Signs and Markings, Report No. FHWA-SA-09-010, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
8.
FidellS. (1978). Effectiveness of audible warning signals for emergency vehicles. Human Factors, 20(1), 19-26.
9.
GreenM.AllenM.J.AbramsB.S.WeintraubL. (2008). Forensic Vision with Application to Highway Safety. L&J, Tucson AZ.
10.
HauerE.PersaudD.N. (1986October). Rail-highway grade crossings: Safety and the effect of warning devices. Proceedings American Association for Automotive Medicine, 247-262.
11.
HoffmanE.R. (1991). Accelerator-to-brake movement times. Ergonomics, 34(3), 277-287.
12.
KargerD.W.BayhaF.H. (1987). Engineered Work Measurement (4th Edition). New York: Industrial Press.
13.
KitoM.HaraguchiM.FunatsuT.SatoM.KondoM. (1989). Measurements of gaze movements while driving. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 19-25.
14.
LandM. F. (2006). Eye movements and the control of actions in everyday life. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 25, 296–324.
15.
LarueG.S.WatlingC.N.BlackA.AWoodJ.M. (2019). Getting the attention of drivers back on passive railway level crossings: Evaluation of advanced flashing lights. Transp. Research Record, 2673(2), 789-798.
16.
McCarthyR.L.FinneganJ.P.FowlerG.F.BrownS.B. (1982). Average operator inaction characteristics with lever controls: Study of the column mounted gear selector lever. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 26, 418-422.
17.
MorrisseyJ. (1980). Effectiveness of Flashing Lights and Flashing Lights with Gates in Reducing Accident Frequency at Public Rail-Highway Crossings (Rep. No. FRA-RRS-80-005).
18.
MortimerR.G. (1991). Visual factors in rail-highway grade crossing accidents. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 35, 600-602.
19.
MortimerR.G. (1994). Oh! Say, can you hear that train coming to the crossing? Proc. of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 38, 898-902.
20.
MuttartJ.W. (2003). Development and evaluation of driver response time predictors based upon meta analyses. SAE Tech. Paper 2003-01-0885.
21.
OgdenB. D. (2007). Railroad-highway grade crossing handbook. Revised 2nd ed.U.S. Department of Transportation Report, FHWA-TS-86-215.
22.
PatlaA.E.VickersJ.N. (1997). Where and when do we look as we approach and step over an obstacle in the travel path?NeuroReport, 8, 3661-3665.
23.
RaubR.A. (2006). Examination of highway-rail grade crossing collisions over 10 years in seven Midwestern states. ITE Journal, 76(4), 16-26.
24.
RichardsS.H.HeatheringtonK.W. (1988).Motorist understanding of railroad-highway grade crossing traffic control devices and associated traffic laws. Transportation Research Record, 1160, 52-59.
25.
RomoserM.R.E.PollatsekA.FisherD.L.WilliamsC.C. (2013). Comparing glance patterns of older versus younger experienced drivers: Scanning for hazards while approaching and entering the intersection. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psych. Behav., 16, 104–116.
26.
SchulteW.R. (1975). Effectiveness of automatic warning devices in reducing accidents at grade crossings. Transportation Research Record, 611, 49–57.
27.
ShinarD.RazS. (1982). Driver response to different railroad crossing protection systems. Ergonomics, 25(9), 801-808.
28.
ShinodaH.HayhoeM.M.ShrivastavaA. (2001). What controls attention in natural environments?Vision Res., 41(25-26), 3535-3545.
29.
TidwellJ.E.Jr.HumphreysJ.B. (1980). Driver Knowledge of Grade Crossing Information. Transportation Research Record 811, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.,
30.
UnderwoodG.ChapmanP.BrocklehurstN.UnderwoodJ.CrundallD. (2003). Visual attention while driving: Sequences of eye fixations made by experienced and novice drivers. Ergonomics, 46, 629-646.
31.
WangJ.DixonK.LiH.OgleJ. (2004). Normal acceleration behavior of passenger vehicles starting from rest at all-way stop-controlled intersections. Transp. Research Record, 1883, 158-166.
32.
WardN.J.WildeG.J.S. (1995). Field observation of advance warning/advisory signage for passive railway crossings with restricted lateral sightline visibility: An experimental investigation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 27(2), 185-197.
