BrookeJ. (1996). SUS: a quick and dirty usability scale. In: JordanP. W.ThomasB.WeerdmeesterB. A.McCllelandI. L. (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
2.
DenfordM. J.SteeleJ. A.RoyR.KalantzisE. (2004). Measurement of Air Traffic Control Situational Awareness Enhancement through radar support toward operating envelope expansion of an unmanned aerial vehicle. Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1109/wsc.2004.1371422
3.
EndsleyM. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in Dynamic Systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37(1), 32–64. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543
GonsalvesN. J.OgunseijuO. R.AkanmuA. A.NnajiC. A. (2021). Assessment of a passive wearable robot for reducing low back disorders during rebar work. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 26, 936–952. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2021.050
6.
KimS.LawtonW.NussbaumM. A.SrinivasanD. (2019). Effects of using a prototype whole-body powered exoskeleton for performing industrial tasks. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 63(1), 1086–1087. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181319631469
7.
KimS.SrinivasanD.NussbaumM. A.LeonessaA. (2021). Human gait during level walking with an occupational whole-body powered exoskeleton: Not yet a walk in the Park. IEEE Access, 9, 47901–47911. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3068836
8.
KulkarniC.HsingHW.KandilD.KommarajuS.LauN.SrinivasanD. (2020). Designing an augmented reality based interface for wearable exoskeletons. Proc. the 2020 Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 38-41. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1071181320641012
LauN.BoringR. (2017) Situation Awareness in Complex Systems. In CuevasH. M.VelázquezJ.DattelA. R. (Eds.), Human Factors in Practice: Concepts and Applications (pp. 55-70). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.
11.
MazzaeE. N.BarickmanF.BaldwinG. H. S.RanneyT. (2008). On-road study of drivers’ use of rearview video systems (ORSDURVS) (DOT HS 811 024). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
12.
MitchellD. K. (2000). Mental Workload and Arl Workload Modeling Tools. Army Research Lab Aberdeen Proving Ground.
13.
ParkH.KimS.NussbaumM. A.SrinivasanD. (2022). Changes in kinematics and muscle activity when learning to use a whole-body powered exoskeleton for stationary load handling. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 66(1), 273–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181322661218
SawickiG. S.BeckO. N.KangI.YoungA. J. (2020). The exoskeleton expansion: Improving walking and running economy. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00663-9
16.
TaylorR. M. (1990). Situational Awareness Rating Technique (SART): The development of a tool for aircrew systems design. Situational Awareness, 111–128. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315087924-8
17.
WickensC. D. (2002). Situation awareness and workload in aviation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(4), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00184
18.
YangC.-J.ZhangJ.-F.ChenY.DongY.-M.ZhangY. (2008). A review of exoskeleton-type systems and their Key Technologies. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 222(8), 1599–1612. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544062jmes936
19.
YeeS.NguyenL.GreenP.OberholtzerJ.MillerB. (2007). Visual, auditory, cognitive, and psychomotor demands of real in-vehicle tasks University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute.