Comparison of Postdoctoral Pharmacy Training Programs: Drug Information Residencies and Medical Information Fellowships

Abstract

Pharmacy graduates interested in postdoctoral training opportunities in drug information or Medical Information have the option to pursue either a fellowship within the pharmaceutical industry or a clinical residency. Limited resources exist for pharmacy students to gain insight into the differences between drug information (DI) and medical information (MI) training programs. The purpose of this project is to identify available opportunities for postdoctoral training in DI or MI disciplines and to identify similarities and differences between them. DI residencies and MI fellowships were identified by examination of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) and the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) residency directories, the ASHP Personal Placement Service (PPS) index, and online keyword searching for nonindexed programs. The authors investigated individual programs via publicly available information to classify core responsibilities and skill sets developed; a total of 24 DI residency programs and 33 MI fellowships focusing or containing at least 1 component in medical information were evaluated. All ASHP-accredited DI residencies offered teaching, formulary management, adverse drug reaction and medication error reporting, drug utilization evaluation, and policy development as professional growth opportunities. The most commonly encountered development activities in MI fellowships were creating standard response documents, collaborating with cross functional teams, teaching or precepting, and reviewing promotional materials. Institutions and health care providers (HCPs) are the primary recipients of DI services whereas MI services respond to consumers, payors, HCPs, and external organizations. Employment prospects commonly overlap between the 2 training programs.