BeggCChoMEastwoodS. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA. 1996;276:637–639.
4.
MoherDSchulzKFAltmanDG: CONSORT Group. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet. 2001;357:1191–1194.
5.
MoherDHopewellSSchulzKF. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c869.
6.
IoannidisJPEvansSJGotzschePC. Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:781–788.
7.
TurnerLShamseerLAltmanDG. Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11: MR000030.
8.
MaginPVictoireAZhenXM. Under-reporting of socioeconomic status of patients in stroke trials: adherence to CONSORT principles. Stroke. 2013;44:2920–2922.
9.
MaggiCBGriebelerIHda SilvaDal Pizzol T. Information on adverse events in randomised clinical trials assessing drug interventions published in four medical journals with high impact factors. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2014;26:9–22.
10.
CammCFAghaRAEdisonE. CONSORT adherence in journals is still far from perfect. Ann Surg. 2015;261: e38.
11.
BrændAMStraandJKlovningA. Clinical drug trials in general practice: how well are external validity issues reported?BMC Fam Pract. 2017;18:113.
12.
KaperNMSwartKMAGrolmanWVan Der HeijdenGJMG. Quality of reporting and risk of bias in therapeutic otolaryngology publications. J Laryngol Otol. 2018;132:22–28.
13.
SteinbrookR. Public registration of clinical trials. New Engl J Med. 2004;351:315–317.
RiverosCDechartresAPerrodeauE. Timing and completeness of trial results posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and published in journals. PLoS Med. 2013;10: e1001566.
16.
HartungDMZarinDAGuiseJM. Reporting discrepancies between the ClinicalTrials.gov results database and peer-reviewed publications. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:477–483.
17.
TangERavaudPRiverosCPerrodeauEDechartresA. Comparison of serious adverse events posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and published in corresponding journal articles. BMC Med. 201514;13:189.
18.
KatzDL. Clinical Epidemiology & Evidence-Based Medicine: Fundamental Principles of Clinical Reasoning & Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
19.
FusterV. Who truly benefits from pre-publishing and rushing publishing? Not patients, nor clinicians. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:3199–3200.
20.
BauchnerH. The rush to publication: an editorial and scientific mistake. JAMA. 2017;318:1109–1110.
21.
TurnerJR. Update from the field of renal sympathetic denervation: a focus on safety nomenclature considerations. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science. 2017;51:664–668.