Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The authors revisit the problem of exact Bayesian inference comparing two independent binomial proportions. Numerical integration in R is used to compute exact posterior distribution functions, probability densities, and quantiles of the risk difference, relative risk, and odds ratio. An application of the methodology is given in the context of randomized comparative proof-of-concept clinical trials that are driven by evaluation of quantitative criteria combining statistical significance and clinical relevance. A two-stage adaptive design based on predictive probability of success is proposed and its operating characteristics are studied via Monte Carlo simulation. The authors conclude that exact Bayesian methods provide an elegant and efficient way to facilitate design and analysis of proof-of-concept studies.

Keywords

adaptive design Bayesian methods numerical integration R proof of concept two independent binomial proportions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cartwright

Cohen

Fleishaker

. Proof of concept: a PhRMA position paper with recommendations for best practice. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;87 (3):278–285.

Fisch

Jones

Kerman

Rosenkranz

Schmidli

. Bayesian design of proof-of-concept trials [published online May 14, 2014]. Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science.

Spiegelhalter

Abrams

Myles

. Bayesian Approaches to Clinical Trials and Health Care Evaluation. New York, NY: Wiley; 2004.

Berry

Carlin

Lee

Muller

. Bayesian Adaptive Methods for Clinical Trials. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall / CRC Biostatistics Series; 2010.

Sistrom

Garvan

. Proportions, odds, and risk. Radiology. 2004;230 (1):12–19.

Knol

Duijnhoven

Grobbee

. Potential misinterpretation of treatment effects due to use of odds ratios and logistic regression in randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE. 2011;6 (6):e21248.

Altham

PME

. Exact Bayesian analysis of a 2x2 contingency table, and Fisher’s “exact” significance test. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1969;31 (2):261–269.

Nurminen

Mutanen

. Exact Bayesian analysis of two proportions. Scand J Statist. 1987;14:67–77.

Marshall

. Bayesian analysis of case-control studies. Stat Med. 1988;7:1223–1230.

10.

Hashemi

Nandram

Goldberg

. Bayesian analysis for a single 2x2 table. Stat Med. 1997;16:1311–1328.

11.

Pham-Gia

Turkkan

. Bayesian analysis of the difference of two proportions. Commun Stat A – Theor. 1993;22 (6):1755–1771.

12.

Pham-Gia

. Distributions of the ratios of independent Beta variables and applications. Commun Stat A – Theor. 2000;29 (12):2693–2715.

13.

Nadarajah

Kotz

. Statistical distribution of the difference of two proportions [correction: Stat Med. 2007;29:320]. Stat Med. 2007;26:3518–3523.

14.

Chen

Luo

. A few remarks on “Statistical distribution of the difference of two proportions.” Stat Med. 2011;30:1913–1915.

15.

Kawasaki

Miyaoka

. A Bayesian inference of P(π₁ > π₂) for two proportions. J Biopharm Stat. 2012;22:425–437.

16.

Kawasaki

Miyaoka

. A Bayesian non-inferiority test for two independent binomial proportions. Pharm Stat. 2013;12:201–206.

17.

R Foundation for Statistical Computing. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org/.

18.

Lee

Liu

. A predictive probability design for phase II cancer clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2008;5:93–106.

19.

Sambucini

. A Bayesian predictive two-stage design for phase II clinical trials. Stat Med. 2008;27:1199–1224.

20.

Sambucini

. A Bayesian predictive strategy for an adaptive two-stage design in phase II clinical trials. Pharm Stat. 2010;29:1430–1442.

21.

Yin

Chen

Lee

. Phase II trial design with Bayesian adaptive randomization and predictive probability. Appl Stat. 2012;61 (2):219–235.

22.

Thompson

. On the likelihood that one unknown probability exceeds another in view of the evidence of two samples. Biometrika. 1933;25:285–294.

23.

Gradshteyn

Ryzhik

. Table of Integrals, Series, and Products. 7th ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2007.

24.

Casella

Berger

. Statistical Inference. 2nd ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury; 2002.

25.

Olsson

Nelson

. The Nelder-Mead simplex procedure for function minimization. Technometrics. 1975;17:45–51.

26.

Kerman

. Neutral noninformative and informative conjugate beta and gamma prior distributions. Electron J Stat. 2011;5:1450–1470.

27.

[Special technical issue on adaptive designs for clinical trials]. J Biopharm Stat. 2012;22(4).

28.

US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: adaptive design clinical trials for drugs and biologics (draft document). http://www.fda.gov/downloads/DrugsGuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM201790.pdf. Accessed March 16, 2014.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

Exact Bayesian Inference Comparing Binomial Proportions,With Application to Proof-of-Concept Clinical Trials

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material