Sustainable human presence on the Moon and Mars requires surface infrastructure capable of supporting landing, refueling, cargo handling, and ISRU. This paper presents a systems architecture for extraterrestrial spaceports, informed by terrestrial logistics analogs (e.g., port operations, ICAO standards) and space mission data (Artemis, Perseverance, VIPER). Key components include regolith-mitigating landing pads, autonomous construction using robotic excavators (e.g., RASSOR), ISRU-to-propulsion chains (e.g., Mars Oxygen In-Situ Resource Utilization Experiment, Sabatier reactors), and modular habitats. The analysis identifies key gaps: limited validation of ISRU-derived materials under lunar/Martian stressors, absence of standardized interface protocols for cross-provider interoperability, and insufficient power solutions for 14-day lunar nights or Martian dust storms. A phased implementation strategy is proposed, from robotic site surveys (2030s) to crew-tended hubs (2040s), prioritizing risk reduction through Earth-based analog testing and international standardization. The framework supports the emergence of an Interplanetary Logistics Grid but does not prescribe governance models. Instead, it offers a technically grounded foundation for infrastructure development aligned with COSPAR planetary protection and sustainability principles.
MazurSK, MinichD, SzocikK. Legal, political, and ethical challenges of Mars settlement. Astropolitics2020;18(3):223–237; doi: 10.1080/14777622.2021.1907994
2.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Moon to Mars architecture. NASA; 2025. Available from: https://www.nasa.gov/moontomarsarchitecture/ [Last accessed: May13, 2026].
3.
SandersGB, LarsonWE. Integration of in-situ resource utilization into Lunar/Mars exploration through field analogs. Adv Space Res2011;47(1):20–29; doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2010.08.020
4.
DrakeBG, et al.Human exploration of Mars, design reference architecture 5.0. In: IEEE Xplore. 2010; pp. 1–24, doi: 10.1109/AERO.2010.5446736
5.
ZhangR, WangT, WangG. Review of Lunar regolith forming technologies for in-situ manufacturing/construction on the Lunar surface. Addit Manuf Front2025;4(3):200238; doi: 10.1016/j.amf.2025.200238
6.
KanjumbaWC. An integrated network for commercial spaceports: Enhancing global space access and collaboration—paper ID: 95293. International Astronautical Federation; 2025. Available from: https://dl.iafastro.directory/event/IAC-2025/paper/95293/ [Last accessed: May13, 2026].
7.
CrawfordIA. Lunar resources: A review. Prog Phys Geogr2015;39(2):137–167.
8.
ZuberMT, HeadJW, SmithDE, et al.Constraints on the volatile distribution within Shackleton crater at the Lunar South pole. Nature2012;486(7403):378–381; doi: 10.1038/nature11216
9.
SpeyererEJ, RobinsonMS. Persistently illuminated regions at the Lunar poles: Ideal sites for future exploration. Icarus2013;222(1):122–136; doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.10.010
10.
SchrunkD, SharpeBL, CooperBL, ThangaveluM. The Moon: Resources, Future Development, and Settlement. 2nd ed.Springer Praxis Books: Chichester, UK; 2007.
11.
SharpeBL, SchrunkDG. Malapert mountain: Gateway to the Moon. Adv Space Res2003;31(11):2467–2472; doi: 10.1016/s0273-1177(03)00535-0
12.
LuchsingerKM, ChanoverNJ, StryckerPD, et al.Water within a permanently shadowed lunar crater: Further LCROSS modeling and analysis. Icarus2021;354:114089; doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2020.114089
13.
Washington University. Lunar orbital data explorer - product search. Washington University in St. Louis; 2026. Available from: https://ode.rsl.wustl.edu/moon/productsearch [Last accessed: May13, 2026].
14.
CoyanJ, SieglerM, Martinez-ComachoJ, et al.Prospectivity modeling of the NASA VIPER landing site at Mons Mouton near the Lunar South pole. Planet Sci J2025;6(5):105; doi: 10.3847/psj/adbc6c
15.
CulbertCJ, EhlmannBL, FraemanAA. Revolutionizing access to the mars surface a strategy: Frequent. Affordable. Bold. W. M. Keck Institute for Space Studies (KISS); 2024. Available from: https://www.kiss.caltech.edu/ [Last accessed: May13, 2026].
16.
HintzeP, MeierA, ShahM, DevorR. Sabatier system design study for a Mars ISRU propellant production plant. NASA Technical Reports Server; 2018. Available from: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20180004697 [Last accessed: May13, 2026].
17.
Mouginis-MarkPJ. Olympus mons volcano, Mars: A photogeologic view and new insights. Geochemistry2018;78(4):397–431; doi: 10.1016/j.chemer.2017.11.006
18.
PeulvastJ-P, MègeD, ChiciakJ, et al.Morphology, evolution and tectonics of Valles Marineris Wallslopes (Mars). Geomorphology2001;37(3–4):329–352; doi: 10.1016/s0169-555x(00)00085-4
19.
BucknerDK, MojarroA. An organics-forward approach to searching for life on Mars. Nat Commun2026;17(1); doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-72266-2
20.
GrotzingerJP, CrispJA, VasavadaAR. Curiosity’s mission of exploration at Gale crater, Mars. Elements2015;11(1):19–26; doi: 10.2113/gselements.11.1.19
21.
BanerdtWB, SmrekarSE, LognonnéP, et al.Initial results from the InSight mission on Mars. Nat Geosci2020;13(3):183–189; doi: 10.1038/s41561-020-0544-y
22.
BramsonAM, ByrneS, BapstJ, et al.Preservation of Midlatitude ice sheets on Mars. JGR Planets2017;122(11):2250–2266; doi: 10.1002/2017je005357
SowersGF, DreyerCB. Ice mining in Lunar permanently shadowed regions. New Space2019;7(4):235–244; doi: 10.1089/space.2019.0002
30.
HoffmanJA, HechtMH, RappD, et al.Mars oxygen ISRU experiment (MOXIE)—preparing for human Mars exploration. Sci Adv2022;8(35):eabp8636; doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abp8636
31.
YangZ, LiuY, WangH, et al.Making fuels on Mars by Sabatier reaction. Innov Energy2025;2(2):100086; doi: 10.59717/j.xinn-energy.2025.100086
32.
NotardonatoWU, SwangerAM, FesmireJE, et al.Zero boil-off methods for large-scale liquid hydrogen tanks using integrated refrigeration and storage. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng2017;278:e012012; doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/278/1/012012
33.
JohansenMR. An update on NASA’s Lunar dust mitigation strategy. NASA Technical Reports Server; 2020. Available from: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/ [Last accessed: May13, 2026].
34.
SlabaTC, BahadoriAA, ReddellBD, et al.Optimal shielding thickness for Galactic Cosmic ray environments. Life Sci Space Res (Amst)2017;12:1–15; doi: 10.1016/j.lssr.2016.12.003
35.
BaoC, ZhangD, WangQ, et al.Lunar in situ large-scale construction: Quantitative evaluation of regolith solidification techniques. Engineering2024;39:204–221; doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2024.03.004
36.
BeatyD, AlbeeA, AllenCC, et al.Analysis of the Mars feedforward value of possible Lunar objectives. Mars Forward Lunar Objectives Science Analysis Group (MFLO-SAG); 2007. Available from: https://www.lpi.usra.edu/ [Last accessed: May13, 2026].
37.
HaberleRM, et al.The Atmosphere and Climate of Mars. Cambridge University Press; 2017.
38.
CesarettiG, DiniE, De KestelierX, et al.Building components for an outpost on the Lunar soil by means of a novel 3D printing technology. Acta Astronaut2014;93:430–450; doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.07.034
KanjumbaWC. Omega spaceport: Establishing Kenya as a global hub for equatorial space access and commercial space sector growth—paper ID: 95292. International Astronautical Federation; 2025. Available from: https://dl.iafastro.directory/event/IAC-2025/paper/95292/ [Last accessed: May13, 2026].
HeinickeC, ArnhofM. A review of existing analog habitats and lessons for future Lunar and Martian habitats. REACH2021;21–22:100038; doi: 10.1016/j.reach.2021.100038
54.
KanjumbaWC. Integrating technology, sustainability, and human resilience under a fully functional space ecosystem. In: COSPAR Symposium; 2025.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Solar wind on the Moon. NASA Science; 2025. Available from: https://science.nasa.gov/moon/solar-wind/ [Last accessed: May13, 2026].
57.
DobneyW, MolsL, MistryD, et al.Evaluation of deep space exploration risks and mitigations against radiation and microgravity. Front Nucl Med2023;3:1225034; doi: 10.3389/fnume.2023.1225034
58.
BlunierS, AthanasopoulosD, DittmarC, et al.Regolith-based Lunar habitat for astronaut radiation protection and organ dose assessment. Planet Space Sci2025;261:106116; doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2025.106116
59.
FengY, PanPZ, TangX, et al.A comprehensive review of Lunar lava tube base construction and field research on a potential Earth test site. Int J Min Sci Technol2024;34(9):1201–1216; doi: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2024.06.003
60.
FerroneK, WillisC, GuanF, et al.A review of magnetic shielding technology for space radiation. Radiation2023;3(1):46–57; doi: 10.3390/radiation3010005
61.
CatlingDC. Mars atmosphere: history and surface interactions. In: Encyclopedia of the Solar System, Third Edition. Elsevier; 2014; pp. 343–357, doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-415845-0.00016-5
62.
EhresmannB, ZeitlinC, HasslerDM, et al.The Martian surface radiation environment at solar minimum measured with MSL/RAD. Icarus2023;393:115035; doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2022.115035
63.
TownsendLW. Overview of active methods for shielding spacecraft from energetic space radiation. Physica Medica2001;17(Suppl 1):1–5. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
64.
HasslerDM, ZeitlinC, Wimmer-SchweingruberRF, et al.; MSL Science Team. Mars’ surface radiation environment measured with the Mars science laboratory’s curiosity rover. Science2014;343(6169):1244797; doi: 10.1126/science.1244797
65.
IwaseS, NishimuraN, TanakaK, ManoT. Effects of microgravity on human physiology. In: Beyond LEO - Human Health Issues for Deep Space Exploration. IntechOpen: London, UK; 2020; doi: 10.5772/intechopen.90700
NASA Technology Transfer Program. Spacecraft with artificial gravity modules. NASA Technology Transfer Program; 2025. Available from: https://technology.nasa.gov/ [Last accessed: May13, 2026].
68.
MarquezJ, KaiserMK, FeinbergAN, et al.Evaluation of human and automation/robotics integration needs for future human exploration missions. NASA Ames Human Systems Integration Division. Available from: https://human-factors.arc.nasa.gov/ [Last accessed: May13, 2026].
69.
LeiS, GuoqingZ, YaohuiW, et al.Strategies and prospects for energy storage in future Lunar base. Adv Mech Eng2025;17(8); doi: 10.1177/16878132251362316
70.
KerslakeTW, GefertLP. Solar power system analyses for electric propulsion missions. In: Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference. NASA/TM-1999-209289. 1999; doi: 10.1109/62.894171
71.
KumbaK, UpenderP, BudumaP, et al.Solar tracking systems: Advancements, challenges, and future directions: A review. Energy Reports2024;12:3566–3583; doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2024.09.038
PatelMR, BeikO. Spacecraft Power Systems. CRC Press; 2023, doi: 10.1201/9781003344605
74.
ZanonP, DunnM, BrooksG. Current Lunar dust mitigation techniques and future directions. Acta Astronaut2023;213:627–644; doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.09.031
75.
ForgetF, HourdinF, FournierR, et al.Improved general circulation models of the martian atmosphere from the surface to above 80 km. J Geophys Res1999;104(E10):24155–24175; doi: 10.1029/1999JE001025
76.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA passive thermal control engineering guidebook. NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS); 2023. Available from: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/ [Last accessed: May13, 2026].
77.
KahreMA, et al.The Mars dust cycle. The Atmosphere and Climate of Mars, Cambridge University Press; 2017; pp. 295–337, doi: 10.1017/9781139060172.010
78.
KanasN, ManzeyD. Space Psychology and Psychiatry. Springer: New York, NY; 2008; doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6770-9
JiaB, FaW, XieM, et al.Regolith properties in the Chang’E‐5 landing region of the Moon: Results from multi‐source remote sensing observations. JGR Planets2021;126(7); doi: 10.1029/2021JE006934
81.
ZhangP, WuQ, ChenY, et al.Overview of the lunar in-situ resource utilization techniques for future Lunar missions. Space2023;3; doi: 10.34133/space.0037
82.
ObosuM, FrimpongS. Advances in automation and robotics: The state of the emerging future mining industry. J Saf Sustain2025;2(3):181–194; doi: 10.1016/j.jsasus.2025.05.003
83.
SauroF, PozzobonR, MassironiM, et al.Lava tubes on Earth, Moon and Mars: A review on their size and morphology revealed by comparative planetology. Earth Sci Rev2020;209:103288; doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103288
RaymanMD. Lessons from the Dawn mission to Ceres and Vesta. Acta Astronaut2020;176:233–237; doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.06.023
86.
National Air and Space Museum. Gravity assist. Smithsonian’s National Air and Space Museum. Available from: https://timeandnavigation.si.edu/ [Last accessed: May13, 2026].
87.
United Nations. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations; 2025. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/ [Last accessed: May13, 2026].
World Bank. Climate Investment Funds (CIF). CIF; 2025. Available from: https://www.cif.org/ [Last accessed: May13, 2026].
90.
Global Environment Facility. Global environment facility. GEF; 2025. Available from: https://www.thegef.org/ [Last accessed: May13, 2026].
91.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA innovative advanced concepts. NASA; 2025. Available from: https://www.nasa.gov/ [Last accessed: May13, 2026].
92.
European Space Agency. Advanced concepts team. ESA; 2025. Available from: https://www.esa.int/ [Last accessed: May13, 2026].
93.
International Finance Corporation. Creating green bond markets—insights, innovations, and tools from emerging markets. World Bank Group; 2018. Available from: https://www.climatebonds.net/ [Last accessed: May13, 2026].
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Artemis accords. NASA; 2026. Available from: https://www.nasa.gov/artemis-accords/ [Last accessed: May13, 2026].
98.
Committee on Space Research. COSPAR policy on planetary protection. COSPAR Business; 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.lssr.2022.12.001
99.
International Telecommunication Union. Radio regulations. ITU; 2024. Available from: https://www.itu.int/pub/R-REG-RR [Last accessed: May13, 2026].
Official Journal of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. Law of July 20th 2017 on the exploration and use of space resources. Official Journal of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg; 2017. Available from: https://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2017/07/20/a674/jo/en [Last accessed: May13, 2026].
