Affective and interpersonal features of psychopathy are considered hallmarks of the disorder. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA), which is well suited for examining dynamic processes in day-to-day life, has not been used to study how psychopathy influences emotional experiences and interpersonal behavior in adults. This preregistered study examined how psychopathy relates to socioaffective processes in daily life. Individuals from two samples enriched for traits related to psychopathy (Sample 1 N = 142; Sample 2 N = 159) completed EMA protocols focused on a variety of interpersonal and affective experiences (between 8,137 and 16,460 total observations). The samples differed in sex, socioeconomic status, age, and ethnic diversity, which allowed us to examine the replicability and generalizability of results. Results showed that psychopathy was related to distinct affective experiences in both samples (e.g., increased hostile affect) but was unrelated to diversity in affective experiences and rarely moderated within-person socioaffective processes. Future directions for research on the affective and interpersonal processes of psychopathy are discussed.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
2.
AndershedH.KerrM.StattinH.LevanderS. (2002). Psychopathic traits in non-referred youths: A new assessment tool. In BlaauwE.SheridanL. (Eds.), Psychopaths: Current international perspectives (pp. 131–158). Elsevier.
3.
BenningS. D.PatrickC. J.HicksB. M.BlonigenD. M.KruegerR. F. (2003). Factor structure of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory: Validity and implications for clinical assessment. Psychological Assessment, 15(3), 340–350.
4.
BenningS. D.SmithE. A. (2019). Forms, importance, and ineffability of factor interactions to define personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 33(5), 623–632.
5.
BensonL.RamN.AlmeidaD. M.ZautraA. J.OngA. D. (2018). Fusing biodiversity metrics into investigations of daily life: Illustrations and recommendations with emodiversity. Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 73, 75–86. http://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx025
BlaisJ.SolodukhinE.ForthA. E. (2014). A meta-analysis exploring the relationship between psychopathy and instrumental versus reactive violence. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(7), 797–821. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813519629
8.
BlonigenD. M. (2013). Is fearless dominance relevant to the construct of psychopathy? Reconciling the dual roles of theory and clinical utility. Personality Disorders, 4(1), 87–88.
9.
BussA. H.DurkeeA. (1957). An inventory for assessing different types of hostility. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 21, 343–349.
10.
CamposC.PasionR.AzeredoA.RamiãoE.MazerP.MacedoI.BarbosaF. (2022). Refining the link between psychopathy, antisocial behavior, and empathy: A meta-analytical approach across different conceptual frameworks. Clinical Psychology Review, 94, Article 102145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102145
11.
CleckleyH. (1988). The mask of sanity (5th ed.). Mosby. (Original work published 1941)
12.
CookW.MedleyD. (1954). Proposed hostility and Pharasaic-virtue scales for the MMPI. Journal of Applied Psychology, 38, 414–418.
13.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Psychological Assessment Resources.
14.
CrickN. R.DodgeK. A. (1996). Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67(3), 993–1002.
15.
CroweM. L.WeissB. M.SleepC. E.HarrisA. M.CarterN. T.LynamD. R.MillerJ. D. (2021). Fearless dominance/boldness is not strongly related to externalizing behaviors: An item response-based analysis. Assessment, 28, 413–428.
16.
DerefinkoK. J. (2015). Psychopathy and low anxiety: Meta-analytic evidence for the absence of inhibition, not affect. Journal of Personality, 83(6), 693–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12124
17.
De RidderJ.PihetS.SuterM.CaldaraR. (2016). Empathy in institutionalized adolescents with callous-unemotional traits: An ecological momentary assessment study of emotion recognition. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(5), 653–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815618431
18.
EdershileE. A.SzücsA.DombrovskiA.WrightA. G. C. (2023). Dynamics of narcissistic grandiosity and vulnerability in naturalistic and experimental settings. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/79e6m
19.
FrickP. J. (2009). Extending the construct of psychopathy to youth: Implications for understanding, diagnosing, and treating antisocial children and adolescents. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 54, 803–812.
20.
FrickP. J.CornellA. H.BodinS. D.DaneH. E.BarryC. T.LoneyB. R. (2003). Callous-unemotional traits and developmental pathways to severe conduct problems. Developmental Psychology, 39(2), 246–260.
21.
GarofaloC.NeumannC. S. (2017). Psychopathy and emotion regulation taking stock and moving forward. In DelisiM. (Ed.), Routledge international handbook of psychopathy and crime (pp. 58–79). Routledge.
22.
GarofaloC.NeumannC. S.VelottiP. (2021). Psychopathy and aggression: The role of emotion dysregulation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(23–24), NP12640–NP12664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519900946
23.
GarofaloC.NeumannC. S.Zeigler-hillV.MeloyJ. R. (2019). Spiteful and contemptuous: A New look at the emotional experiences related to psychopathy. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 10, 173–184.
24.
HareR. D. (2003). Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (2nd ed.). Multi-Health Systems.
HicksB. M.MarkonK. E.PatrickC. J.KruegerR. F.NewmanJ. P. (2004). Identifying psychopathy subtypes on the basis of personality structure. Psychological Assessment, 16(3), 276–288.
27.
HicksB. M.PatrickC. J. (2006). Psychopathy and negative emotionality: Analyses of suppressor effects reveal distinct relations with emotional distress, fearfulness, and anger-hostility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(2), 276–287.
28.
HoppenbrouwersS. S.BultenB. H.BrazilI. A. (2016). Parsing fear: A reassessment of the evidence for fear deficits in psychopathy. Psychological Bulletin, 142(6), 573–600.
29.
HopwoodC. J. (2018). Interpersonal dynamics in personality and personality disorders. European Journal of Personality, 32(5), 499–524. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2155
30.
HorleyJ. (2014). The emergence and development of psychopathy. History of the Human Sciences, 27, 91–110.
31.
KamarckT. W.HaskettR. F.MuldoonM.FloryJ. D.AndersonB.BiesR.PollockB.ManuckS. B. (2009). Citalopram intervention for hostility: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 174–188.
32.
KaurinA.KingK. M.WrightA. G. C. (2023). Studying personality pathology with ecological momentary assessment: Harmonizing theory and method. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 14(1), 62–72.
33.
KeenanK.HipwellA.ChungT.SteppS.Stouthamer-LoeberM.LoeberR.McTigueK. (2010). The Pittsburgh Girls Study: Overview and initial findings. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 39(4), 506–521.
34.
LevensonM. R.KiehlK. A.FitzpatrickC. M. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(1), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.151
35.
LilienfeldS. O.AndrewsB. P. (1996). Development and preliminary validation of a self report measure of psychopathic personality traits in noncriminal populations. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 488–524.
36.
LilienfeldS. O.HessT. H. (2001). Psychopathic personality traits and somatization: Sex differences and the mediating role of negative emotionality. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 23(1), 11–24.
37.
LilienfeldS. O.WidowsM. R. (2005). Psychopathic Personality Inventory—Revised (PPI-R) professional manual. Psychological Assessment.
38.
LilienfeldS. O.PatrickC. J.BenningS. D.BergJ.SellbomM.EdensJ. F. (2012). The role of fearless dominance in psychopathy: Confusions, controversies, and clarifications. Personality Disorders, 3(3), 327–340.
39.
LilienfeldS. O.WattsA. L.MurphyB.CostelloT. H.BowesS. M.SmithS. F.LatzmanR. D.HaslamN.TabbK. (2019). Personality disorders as emergent interpersonal syndromes: Psychopathic personality as a case example. Journal of Personality Disorders, 33(5), 577–622.
40.
LobbestaelJ.ArntzA.VonckenM.PotegalM. (2018). Responses to dominance challenge are a function of psychopathy level: A multimethod study. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9(4), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000252
41.
LykkenD. T. (1995). The antisocial personalities. Hillsdale.
42.
LynamD. R.GaughanE. T.MillerJ. D.MillerD. J.Mullins-SweattS.WidigerT. A. (2011). Assessing the basic traits associated with psychopathy: Development and validation of the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment. Psychological Assessment, 23, 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021146
43.
MarcusD. K.FultonJ. J.EdensJ. F. (2013). The two-factor model of psychopathic personality: Evidence from the Psychopathic Personality Inventory. Personality Disorders, 4(1), 67–76.
44.
MarshA. A.BlairR. J. R. (2008). Deficits in facial affect recognition among antisocial populations: A meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32, 454–465.
45.
McCordW.McCordJ. (1964). The psychopath: An essay on the criminal mind. Van Nostrand.
46.
MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2012). An examination of the psychopathic personality inventory’s nomological network: A meta-analytic review. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3(3), 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024567
47.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.).
48.
NentjesL.GarofaloC.KossonD. S. (2022). Emotional functioning in psychopathy: A critical review and integration with general emotion theories. In MarquesP.PaulinoM.AlhoL. (Eds.), Psychopathy and criminal behavior: Current trends and challenges (pp. 75–103). Elsevier.
49.
NeumannC. S.HareR. D.PardiniD. A. (2015). Antisociality and the construct of psychopathy: Data from across the globe. Journal of Personality, 83(6), 678–692.
50.
PatrickC. J. (2022). Psychopathy: Current knowledge and future directions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 18, 387–415.
51.
PatrickC. J.BradleyM. M.LangP. J. (1993). Emotion in the criminal psychopath: Startle reflex modulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 82–92.
52.
PatrickC. J.FowlesD. C.KruegerR. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and Psychopathology, 21(3), 913–938.
53.
PaulhusD. L.NeumannC. S.HareR. D. (2006). Manual for the Self-Report Psychopathy Scale. Multi-Health Systems.
54.
PihetS.De RidderJ.SuterM. (2017). Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) goes to jail capturing daily antisocial behavior in its context, a feasibility and reliability study in incarcerated juvenile offenders. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000275
55.
R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.1.1) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org
56.
SadikajW.DunkleyZ.MoskowitzD. S. (2021). Multilevel structural equation modeling for intensive longitudinal data: A practical guide for personality researchers. In RauthmannJ. F. (Ed.), The handbook of personality dynamics and processes (pp. 855–885). Academic Press.
57.
ScottL. N.WrightA. G. C.BeeneyJ. E.LazarusS. A.PilkonisP. A.SteppS. D. (2017). Borderline personality disorder symptoms and aggression: A within-person process model. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(4), 429–440.
58.
ShermanE. D.LynamD. R. (2017). Psychopathy and low communion: An overlooked and underappreciated core feature. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 8(4), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000203
59.
ShermanE. D.LynamD. R.HeydeB. (2014). Agreeableness accounts for the factor structure of the youth psychopathic traits inventory. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 262–280. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2013_27_124
60.
ShiffmanS.StoneA. A.HuffordM. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 1–32.
Van TilK.VizeC.MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2022). Agreeableness explains the factor structure of the Self-Report Psychopathy Scale, Fourth Edition. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 13(2), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000493
66.
VellaE. J.KamarckT. W.FloryJ. D.ManuckS. (2012). Hostile mood and social strain during daily life: A test of the transactional model. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 44, 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9400-7
67.
VerschuereB.GrotheS.vanG.WaldorpL.WattsA. L.LilienfeldS. O.EdensJ. F.SkeemJ. L.NoordhofA. (2018). What features of psychopathy might be central? A network analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) in three large samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 127(1), 51–65.
68.
VerschuereB.Yasrebi-De KomF. M.van ZelmI.LilienfeldS. O. (2021). A plea for preregistration in personality disorders research: The case of psychopathy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 35(2), 161–176.
69.
VidingE.McCroryE. J. (2018). Understanding the development of psychopathy: Progress and challenges. Psychological Medicine, 48(4), 566–577.
70.
VizeC. E.BarangerD. A. A.FinsaasM. C.GoldsteinB. L.OlinoT. M.LynamD. R. (2023). Moderation effects in personality disorder research. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 14(1), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000582
71.
VizeC. E.RingwaldW. R.EdershileE. A.WrightA. G. C. (2022). Antagonism in daily life: An exploratory ecological momentary assessment study. Clinical Psychological Science, 10(1), 90–108.
72.
WallerR.CorbettN.RaineA.WagnerN. J.BroussardA.EdmondsD.ReardonS.JonesC.Itkin-OferM.SchellT.NeumannC. S. (2021). Reduced sensitivity to affiliation and psychopathic traits. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 12(5), 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000423
73.
WallerR.HydeL. W. (2018). Callous-unemotional behaviors in early childhood: The development of empathy and prosociality gone awry. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.037
74.
WeissB.LavnerJ. A.MillerJ. D. (2018). Self- and partner-reported psychopathic traits’ relations with couples’ communication, marital satisfaction trajectories, and divorce in a longitudinal sample. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9(3), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000233
75.
WittE. A.Brent DonnellanM.BlonigenD. M. (2009). Using existing self-report inventories to measure the psychopathic personality traits of Fearless Dominance and Impulsive Antisociality. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1006–1016.
76.
WittE. A.HopwoodC. J.MoreyL. C.MarkowitzJ. C.McGlashanT. H.GriloC. M.SanislowC. A.SheaM. T.SkodolA. E.GundersonJ. G.DonnellanM. B. (2010). Psychometric characteristics and clinical correlates of NEO-PI-R fearless dominance and impulsive antisociality in the collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study. Psychological Assessment, 22(3), 559–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019617
77.
WrightA. G. C.PincusA. L.HopwoodC. J. (2023). Contemporary integrative interpersonal theory: Integrating structure, dynamics, temporal scale, and levels of analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science, 132(3), 263–276.
78.
WrightA. G. C.SteppS. D.ScottL. N.HallquistM. N.BeeneyJ. E.LazarusS.PilkonisP. A. (2017). The effect of pathological narcissism on interpersonal and affective processes in social interactions. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(7), 898–910.
79.
WrightA. G. C.WoodsW. C. (2020). Personalized models of psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 16, 49–74.
80.
WrightA. G. C.ZimmermannJ. (2019). Applied ambulatory assessment: Integrating idiographic and nomothetic principles of measurement. Psychological Assessment, 31, 1467–1480.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
