A growing body of research suggests that standard group-based models might provide little insight regarding individuals. In the current study, we sought to compare group-based and individual predictors of bothersome tinnitus, illustrating how researchers can use dynamic structural equation modeling (DSEM) for intensive longitudinal data to examine whether findings from analyses of the group apply to individuals. A total of 43 subjects with bothersome tinnitus responded to up to 200 surveys each. In multilevel DSEM, survey items loaded on three factors (tinnitus bother, cognitive symptoms, and anxiety), and results indicated a reciprocal relationship between tinnitus bother and anxiety. In fully idiographic models, the three-factor model fit poorly for two individuals, and the multilevel model did not generalize to most individuals, possibly because of limited power. Research examining heterogeneous conditions, such as tinnitus bother, may benefit from methods such as DSEM that allow researchers to model dynamic relationships.
AnderssonG. (2002). Psychological aspects of tinnitus and the application of cognitive-behavioral therapy. Clinical Psychology Review, 22(7), 977–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-7358(01)00124-6
AsparouhovT.MuthénB. (2020). Comparison of models for the analysis of intensive longitudinal data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(2), 275–297.
BringmannL. F.VissersN.WichersM.GeschwindN.KuppensP.PeetersF.BorsboomD.TuerlinckxF. (2013). A network approach to psychopathology: New insights into clinical longitudinal data. PLOS ONE, 8(4), Article e60188. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060188
10.
Castro-AlvarezS.TendeiroJ. N.de JongeP.MeijerR. R.BringmannL. F. (2021). Mixed-effects trait-state-occasion model: Studying the psychometric properties and the person-situation interactions of psychological dynamics. Structural Equation Modeling, 29(3), 438–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2021.1961587
11.
DearyV.ChalderT.SharpeM. (2007). The cognitive behavioural model of medically unexplained symptoms: A theoretical and empirical review. Clinical Psychology Review, 27(7), 781–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2007.07.002
12.
FisherA. J. (2015). Toward a dynamic model of psychological assessment: Implications for personalized care. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(4), 825–836. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000026
13.
FisherA. J.MedagliaJ. D.JeronimusB. F. (2018). Lack of group-to-individual generalizability is a threat to human subjects research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 115(27), E6106–E6115. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711978115
14.
GeisserM. E.GlassJ. M.RajcevskaL. D.ClauwD. J.WilliamsD. A.KilenyP. R.GracelyR. H. (2008). A psychophysical study of auditory and pressure sensitivity in patients with fibromyalgia and healthy controls. The Journal of Pain, 9(5), 417–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2007.12.006
15.
GeldhofG. J.PreacherK. J.ZyphurM. J. (2014). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods, 19(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032138
16.
GerullK. M.KallogjeriD.PiccirilloM. L.RodebaughT. L.LenzeE. J.PiccirilloJ. F. (2019). Feasibility of intensive ecological sampling of tinnitus in intervention research. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 161(3), 485–492.
HallquistM. N.WileyD. E. (2018). MplusAutomation: An R package for facilitating large-scale latent variable analyses in Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling, 25, 1–18.
19.
HamakerE. L. (2012). Why researchers should think “within-person”: A paradigmatic rationale. In MehlM. R.ConnerT. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 43–61). The Guilford Press.
20.
HamakerE. L.AsparouhovT.BroseA.SchmiedekF.MuthenB. (2018). At the frontiers of modeling intensive longitudinal data: Dynamic structural equation models for the affective measurements from the COGITO study. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(6), 820–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1446819
21.
HamakerE. L.AsparouhovT.MuthenB. (in press). Dynamic structural equation modeling as a combination of time series modeling, multilevel modeling, and structural equation modeling. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), The handbook of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford.
22.
HoareD. J.KowalkowskiV. L.KangS.HallD. A. (2011). Systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials examining tinnitus management. Laryngoscope, 121(7), 1555–1564. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.21825
23.
JacobsonN. C.ChowS.-M.NewmanM. G. (2019). The Differential Time-Varying Effect Model (DTVEM): A tool for diagnosing and modeling time lags in intensive longitudinal data. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 295–315.
24.
KanaanR. A.LepineJ. P.WesselyS. C. (2007). The association or otherwise of the functional somatic syndromes. Psychosomatic Medicine, 69(9), 855–859. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e31815b001a
25.
LafitG.AdolfJ. K.DejonckheereE.Myin-GermeysI.ViechtbauerW.CeulemansE. (2021). Selection of the number of participants in intensive longitudinal studies: A user-friendly shiny app and tutorial for performing power analysis in multilevel regression models that account for temporal dependencies. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920978738
26.
LandgrebeM.AzevedoA.BaguleyD.BauerC.CacaceA.CoelhoC.DornhofferJ.FigueiredoR.FlorH.HajakG.Van de HeyningP.HillerW.KhedrE.KleinjungT.KollerM.LainezJ. M.LonderoA.MartinW. H.MennemeierM.. . . LangguthB. (2012). Methodological aspects of clinical trials in tinnitus: A proposal for an international standard. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 73(2), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.05.002
27.
LeeI. A.LittleT. D. (2012). P-technique factor analysis. In LaursenB.LittleT. D.CardN. A. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 350–363). The Guilford Press.
28.
LiR.DziakJ. J.TanX.HuangL.WagnerA. T.YangJ. (2017). TVEM (time-varying effect model) SAS macro users’ guide (Version 3.1.1). The Methodology Center, Penn State. http://methodology.psu.edu
29.
LiuS. (2017). Person-specific versus multilevel autoregressive models: Accuracy in parameter estimates at the population and individual levels. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 70(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12096
30.
LiuS.KuppensP.BringmannL. (2021). On the use of empirical Bayes estimates as measures of individual traits. Assessment, 28(3), 845–857. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119885019
31.
McNeishD.HamakerE. L. (2020). A primer on two-level dynamic structural equation models for intensive longitudinal data in Mplus. Psychological Methods, 25(5), 610–635. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000250
32.
McNeishD.MackinnonD. P.MarschL. A.PoldrackR. A. (2021). Measurement in intensive longitudinal data. Structural Equation Modeling, 28(5), 807–822. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2021.1915788
33.
MolenaarP. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2(4), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0204_1
34.
MolenaarP. C. M. (2007). Psychological methodology will change profoundly due to the necessity to focus on intra-individual variation. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 41(1), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9011-1
35.
MolenaarP. C. M. (2013). On the necessity to use person-specific data analysis approaches in psychology. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.747435
36.
MolenaarP. C. M.de GooijerJ. G.SchmitzB. (1992). Dynamic factor analysis of nonstationary multivariate time series. Psychometrika, 57(3), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02295422
37.
MoreyR. D.HoekstraR.RouderJ. N.LeeM. D.WagenmakersE. J. (2016). The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(1), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0947-8
PiccirilloM. L.RodebaughT. L. (2019). Foundations of idiographic methods in psychology and applications for psychotherapy. Clinical Psychological Review, 71, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.01.002
40.
PiccirilloM. L.RodebaughT. L. (2022). Personalized networks of social anxiety disorder and depression and implications for treatment. Journal of Affective Disorders, 298(Part A), 262–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.034
41.
SchultzbergM.MuthenB. (2018). Number of subjects and time points needed for multilevel time-series analysis: A simulation study of dynamic structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 25(4), 495–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1392862
42.
SchuurmanN. K.HamakerE. L. (2019). Measurement error and person-specific reliability in multilevel autoregressive modeling. Psychological Methods, 24(1), 70–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000188
43.
TylerR. S.CoelhoC.NobleW. (2006). Tinnitus: Standard of care, personality differences, genetic factors. ORL; Journal of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Its Related Specialties, 68(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1159/000090486
44.
van AlphenT.JakS.Jansen in de WalJ.SchuitemaJ.PeetsmaT. (2022). Determining reliability of daily measures: An illustration with data on teacher stress. Applied Measurement in Education, 35(1), 63–79.
45.
Veterans Benefit Administration. (2022). Annual Benefits Report Fiscal Year 2021. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
46.
WrightA.GatesK.ArizmendiC.LaneS.WoodsW.EdershileE. (2017). Focusing personality assessment on the person: Modeling general, shared, and person specific processes in personality and psychopathology. Psychological Assessment, 31(4), 502–515.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
