In this commentary, we discuss questions and misconceptions about the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) raised by Haeffel et al. We explain what the system classifies and why it is descriptive and atheoretical, and we highlight benefits and limitations of this approach. We clarify why the system is organized according to patterns of covariation or comorbidity among signs and symptoms of psychopathology, and we discuss how it is designed to be falsifiable and revised in a manner that is responsive to data. We refer to the body of evidence for HiTOP’s external validity and for its scientific and clinical utility. We further describe how the system is currently used in clinics. In sum, many of Haeffel et al.’s concerns about HiTOP are unwarranted, and for those concerns that reflect real current limitations of HiTOP, our consortium is working to address them, with the aim of creating a nosology that is comprehensive and useful to both scientists and clinicians.
AchenbachT. M.RescorlaL. A. (2003). Manual for the ASEBA adult forms and profiles. University of Vermont.
2.
BornsteinR. F.NatoliA. P. (2019). Clinical utility of categorical and dimensional perspectives on personality pathology: A meta-analytic review. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 10, 479–490.
3.
ConwayC. C.ForbesM. K.ForbushK. T.FriedE. I.HallquistM. N.KotovR.Mullins-SweattS. N.ShackmanA. J.SkodolA. E.SouthS. C.SunderlandM.WaszczukM. A.ZaldD. H.AfzaliM. H.BornovalovaM. A.CarragherN.DochertyA. R.JonasK. G.KruegerR. F.. . .EatonN. R. (2019). A hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology can transform mental health research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618810696
4.
FirstM. B.RebelloT. J.KeeleyJ. W.BhargavaR.DaiY.KulyginaM.MatsumotoC.RoblesR.StonaA. C.ReedG. M. (2018). Do mental health professionals use diagnostic classifications the way we think they do? A global survey. World Psychiatry, 17(2), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20525
5.
ForbushK. T.HaganK. E.KiteB. A.ChapaD. A.BohrerB. K.GouldS. R. (2017). Understanding eating disorders within internalizing psychopathology: A novel transdiagnostic, hierarchical-dimensional model. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 79, 40–52.
6.
HaeffelG. J.JeronimusB. F.KaiserB. N.WeaverL. J.SoysterP. D.FisherA. J.VargasI.GoodsonJ. T.LuW. (2021). Folk classification and factor rotations: Whales, sharks, and the problems with the hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology (HiTOP). Clinical Psychological Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026211002500
HopwoodC. J.BagbyR. M.GralnickT.RoE.RuggeroC.Mullins-SweattS.KotovR.BachB.CiceroD. C.KruegerR. F.PatrickC. J.ChmielewskiM.DeYoungC. G.DochertyA. R.EatonN. R.ForbushK. T.IvanovaM. Y.LatzmanR. D.PincusA. L.. . . ZimmermannJ. (2020). Integrating psychotherapy with the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP). Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 30(4), 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000156
9.
JohnO. P.NaumannL.SotoC. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). Guilford Press.
10.
KotovR.JonasK. G.CarpenterW. T.DretschM. N.EatonN. R.ForbesM. K.ForbushK. T.HobbsK.ReininghausU.SladeT.SouthS. C.SunderlandM.WaszczukM. A.WidigerT. A.WrightA.ZaldD. H.KruegerR. F.WatsonD., & HiTOP Utility Workgroup. (2020). Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): I. Psychosis superspectrum. World Psychiatry, 19(2), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20730
11.
KotovR.KruegerR. F.WatsonD.AchenbachT. M.AlthoffR. R.BagbyR. M.BrownT. A.CarpenterW. T.CaspiA.ClarkL. A.EatonN. R.ForbesM. K.ForbushK. T.GoldbergD.HasinD.HymanS. E.IvanovaM. Y.LynamD. R.MarkonK.. . . ZimmermanM. (2017). The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(4), 454–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000258
12.
KotovR.KruegerR. F.WatsonD.CiceroD. C.ConwayC. C.DeYoungC. G.EatonN. R.ForbesM. K.HallquistM. N.LatzmanR. D.Mullins-SweattS. N.RuggeroC. J.SimmsL. J.WaldmanI. D.WaszczukM. A.WrightA. G. (2021). The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A quantitative nosology based on consensus of evidence. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 17, 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-093304
13.
KotovR.RuggeroC. J.KruegerR. F.WatsonD.YuanQ.ZimmermanM. (2011). New dimensions in the quantitative classification of mental illness. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68(10), 1003–1011.
14.
KruegerR. F.DerringerJ.MarkonK. E.WatsonD.SkodolA. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM–5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879–1890.
15.
KruegerR. F.HobbsK. A.ConwayC. C.DickD. M.DretschM. N.EatonN. R.ForbesM. K.ForbushK. T.KeyesK. M.LatzmanR. D.MicheliniG.PatrickC. J.SellbomM.SladeT.SouthS. C.SunderlandM.TackettJ.WaldmanI.WaszczukM. A., . . . HiTOP Utility Workgroup. (2021). Validity and utility of the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): II. Externalizing superspectrum. World Psychiatry, 20(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20844
16.
LinnérR. K.BiroliP.KongE.MeddensS. F. W.WedowR.FontanaM. A.LebretonM.TinoS. P.AbdellaouiA.HammerschlagA. R.NivardM. G.OkbayA.RietveldC. A.TimshelP. N.TrzaskowskiM.VlamingR.ZündC. L.BaoY.BuzduganL.. . . BeauchampJ. P. (2019). Genome-wide association analyses of risk tolerance and risky behaviors in over 1 million individuals identify hundreds of loci and shared genetic influences. Nature Genetics, 51(2), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0309-3
17.
MarkonK. E.ChmielewskiM.MillerC. J. (2011). The reliability and validity of discrete and continuous measures of psychopathology: A quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 856–879.
18.
MartinE. A.JonasK. G.LianW.FotiD.DonaldsonK. R.BrometE. J.KotovR. (2021). Predicting long-term outcomes in first-admission psychosis: Does the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) aid DSM in prognostication?Schizophrenia Bulletin, 47(5), 1331–1341. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbab043
19.
McGrewK. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37, 1–10.
20.
MoreyL. C.HopwoodC. J.MarkowitzJ. C.GundersonJ. G.GriloC. M.McGlashanT. H.SheaM. T.YenS.SanislowC. A.AnsellE. B.SkodolA. E. (2012). Comparison of alternative models for personality disorders, II: 6-, 8- and 10-year follow-up. Psychological Medicine, 42(8), 1705–1713. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711002601
21.
NagelM.JansenP. R.StringerS.WatanabeK.de LeeuwC. A.SavageJ. E.HammerschlagA. R.SkeneN. G.Muñoz-ManchadoA. B., 23andMe Research Team, WhiteT.TiemeierH.LinnarssonS.Hjerling-LefflerJ.PoldermanT.SullivanP. F.van der SluisS.PosthumaD. (2018). Meta-analysis of genomewide association studies for neuroticism in individuals identifies novel genetic loci and pathways. Nature Genetics, 50(7), 920–927. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0151-7
22.
OtowaT.HekK.LeeM.ByrneE. M.MirzaS. S.NivardM. G.BigdeliT.AggenS. H.AdkinsD.WolenA.FanousA.KellerM. C.CastelaoE.KutalikZ.der AuweraS. V.HomuthG.NauckM.TeumerA.MilaneschiY.. . . HettemaJ. M. (2016). Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of anxiety disorders. Molecular Psychiatry, 21(10), Article 1485. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2016.11
23.
SimmsL. J.WrightA. G.CiceroD.KotovR.Mullins-SweattS. N.SellbomM.WatsonD.WidigerT. A.ZimmermannJ. (2020). Development of measures for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A collaborative scale development project. Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211015309
24.
SmollerJ. W.AndreassenO. A.EdenbergH. J.FaraoneS. V.GlattS. J.KendlerK. S. (2019). Psychiatric genetics and the structure of psychopathology. Molecular Psychiatry, 24(3), 409–420.
25.
SteinM. B.LeveyD. F.ChengZ.WendtF. R.HarringtonK.PathakG. A.ChoK.QuadenR.RadhakrishnanK.GirgentiM. J.HoY. A.PosnerD.AslanM.DumanR. S.ZhaoH., Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program (no. 575B), VA Million Veteran Program, R.PolimantiJ.ConcatoJ.Gelernter (2021). Genome-wide association analyses of post-traumatic stress disorder and its symptom subdomains in the Million Veteran Program. Nature Genetics, 53(2), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-020-00767-x
26.
WaszczukM. A.EatonN. R.KruegerR. F.ShackmanA. J.WaldmanI. D.ZaldD. H.LaheyB. B.PatrickC. J.ConwayC. C.OrmelJ.HymanS. E.FriedE. I.ForbesM. K.DochertyA. R.AlthoffR. R.BachB.ChmielewskiM.DeYoungC. G.ForbushK. T.. . . KotovR. (2020). Redefining phenotypes to advance psychiatric genetics: Implications from Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 129(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000486
27.
WatsonD.Levin-AspensonH. F.WaszczukM. A.ConwayC. C.DalgleishT.DretschM. N.EatonN. R.ForbesM. K.ForbushK. T.HobbsK. A.MicheliniG.NelsonB. D.SellbomM.SladeT.SouthS. C.SunderlandM.WaldmanI.WitthöftM.WrightA. G. C., . . . HiTOP Utility Workgroup. (2022). Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): III. Emotional dysfunction superspectrum. World Psychiatry. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20943
28.
WinsorM. P. (2009). Taxonomy was the foundation of Darwin’s evolution. Taxon, 58, 43–49.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
