A major question in clinical and moral psychology concerns the nature of the commonly presumed association between psychopathy and moral judgment. In the current preregistered study (N = 443), we aimed to address this question by examining the relation between psychopathy and responses to moral dilemmas pitting consequences for the greater good against adherence to moral norms. To provide more nuanced insights, we measured four distinct facets of psychopathy and used the CNI model to quantify sensitivity to consequences (C), sensitivity to moral norms (N), and general preference for inaction over action (I) in responses to moral dilemmas. Psychopathy was associated with a weaker sensitivity to moral norms, which showed unique links to the interpersonal and affective facets of psychopathy. Psychopathy did not show reliable associations with either sensitivity to consequences or general preference for inaction over action. Implications of these findings for clinical and moral psychology are discussed.
BaronJ.GoodwinG. P. (2020). Consequences, norms, and inaction: A critical analysis. Judgment and Decision Making, 15(3), 421–442.
2.
BartelsD. M.PizarroD. A. (2011). The mismeasure of morals: Antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas. Cognition, 121, 154–161.
3.
Baskin-SommersA. R.BrazilI. A.RyanJ.KohlenbergN. J.NeumannC. S.NewmanJ. P. (2015). Mapping the association of global executive functioning onto diverse measures of psychopathic traits. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 6, 336–346.
4.
Baskin-SommersA. R.NeumannC. S.CopeL. M.KiehlK. A. (2016). Latent-variable modeling of brain gray-matter volume and psychopathy in incarcerated offenders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125, 811–817.
5.
BorgJ. S.Sinnott-ArmstrongW. (2013). Do psychopaths make moral judgments? In KiehlK.Sinnott-ArmstrongW. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of psychopathy and law (pp. 107–130). Oxford University Press.
6.
CaleE. M.LilienfeldS. O. (2002). Sex differences in psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder: A review and integration. Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 1179–1207.
7.
CarréJ. M.HydeL. W.NeumannC. S.VidingE.HaririA. R. (2013). The neural signatures of distinct psychopathic traits. Social Neuroscience, 8, 122–135.
8.
CimaM.TonnaerF.HauserM. D. (2010). Psychopaths know right from wrong but don’t care. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5, 59–67.
9.
ConwayP.GawronskiB. (2013). Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 216–235.
10.
ConwayP.Goldstein-GreenwoodJ.PolacekD.GreeneJ. D. (2018). Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers. Cognition, 179, 241–265.
11.
CroneD. L.LahamS. M. (2017). Utilitarian preferences or action preferences? De-confounding action and moral code in sacrificial dilemmas. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 476–481.
12.
de AchávalD.VillarrealM. F.SallesA.BertomeuM. J.CostanzoE. Y.GoldschmidtM.CastroM. N.van der PoelI.NemeroffC. B.GuinjoanS. M. (2013). Activation of brain areas concerned with social cognition during moral decisions is abnormal in schizophrenia patients and unaffected siblings. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 47(6), 774–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.12.018
13.
DempseyE. E.MooreC.JohnsonS. A.StewartS. H.SmithI. M. (2020). Morality in autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review. Development and Psychopathology, 32, 1069–1085.
14.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
15.
FootP. (1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect. Oxford Review, 5, 5–15.
16.
FriesdorfR.ConwayP.GawronskiB. (2015). Gender differences in responses to moral dilemmas: A process dissociation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 696–713.
17.
GagoB.PereaM.SierraP.LivianosL.Cañada-MartínezA.García-BlancoA. (2019). Do affective episodes modulate moral judgment in individuals with bipolar disorder?Journal of Affective Disorders, 245, 289–296.
18.
GarofaloC.NeumannC. S.MarkD. (2020). Associations between psychopathy and the trait meta-mood scale in incarcerated males. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47, 331–351.
19.
GarofaloC.NeumannC. S.VelottiP. (2020). Psychopathy and aggression: The role of emotion dysregulation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519900946
20.
GawronskiB.ArmstrongJ.ConwayP.FriesdorfR.HütterM. (2017). Consequences, norms, and generalized inaction in moral dilemmas: The CNI model of moral decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 343–376.
21.
GawronskiB.ConwayP.HütterM.LukeD. M.ArmstrongJ.FriesdorfR. (2020). On the validity of the CNI model of moral decision-making: Reply to Baron and Goodwin (2020). Judgment and Decision Making, 15, 1054–1072.
22.
GleichgerrchtE.TomashitisB.SinayV. (2015). The relationship between alexithymia, empathy and moral judgment in patients with multiple sclerosis. European Journal of Neurology, 22, 1295–1303.
23.
GleichgerrchtE.TorralvaT.RattazziA.MarencoV.RocaM.ManesF. (2013). Selective impairment of cognitive empathy for moral judgment in adults with high functioning autism. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 780–788.
24.
GlennA. L.KolevaS.IyerR.GrahamJ.DittoP. H. (2010). Moral identity in psychopathy. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 497–505.
25.
GlennA. L.RaineA.SchugR. A.YoungL.HauserM. (2009). Increased DLPFC activity during moral decision-making in psychopathy. Molecular Psychiatry, 14, 909–911.
26.
Goldstein-GreenwoodJ.ConwayP.SummervilleA.JohnsonB. N. (2020). (How) do you regret killing one to save five? Affective and cognitive regret differ after utilitarian and deontological decisions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46, 1303–1317.
27.
HareR. D.NeumannC. S. (2008). Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 217–246.
28.
HeckD. W.ArnoldN. R.ArnoldD. (2018). TreeBUGS: An R package for hierarchical multinomial-processing-tree modeling. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 264–284.
29.
HillC. D.NeumannC. S.RogersR. (2004). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening version in offenders with axis I disorders. Psychological Assessment, 16, 90–95.
30.
HoppenbrouwersS. S.NeumannC. S.LewisJ.JohanssonP. (2015). A latent variable analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised and behavioral inhibition system/behavioral activation system factors in North American and Swedish offenders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 6, 251–260.
31.
HowardM. C.Van ZandtE. C. (2020). The discriminant validity of honesty-humility: A meta-analysis of the HEXACO, Big Five, and Dark Triad. Journal of Research in Personality, 87, Article 103982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103982
32.
HütterM.KlauerK. C. (2016). Applying processing trees in social psychology. European Review of Social Psychology, 27, 116–159.
33.
KimS. H.KimT. Y.RyuV.HaR. Y.LeeS. J.HaK.ChoH. S. (2015). Manic patients exhibit more utilitarian moral judgments in comparison with euthymic bipolar and healthy persons. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 58, 37–44.
34.
KoelkebeckK.KueglerL.KohlW.EngellA.LencerR. (2018). Social cognition in schizophrenia: The role of mentalizing in moral dilemma decision-making. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 87, 171–178.
35.
KörnerA.DeutschR.GawronskiB. (2020). Using the CNI model to investigate individual differences in moral dilemma judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46, 1392–1407.
36.
KroneisenM.HeckD. W. (2020). Interindividual differences in the sensitivity to consequences, moral norms, and preferences for inaction: Relating basic personality traits to the CNI model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46, 1013–1026.
37.
KrsticS.NeumannC. S.RoyS.RobertsonC. A.KnightR. A.HareR. D. (2018). Using latent variable- and person-centered approaches to examine the role of psychopathic traits in sex offenders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9, 207–216.
38.
LarsenR. R.JalavaJ.GriffithsS. (2020). Are Psychopathy Checklist (PCL) psychopaths dangerous, untreatable, and without conscience? A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 26, 297–311.
39.
LeeK.AshtonM. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism in the Five-Factor Model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1571–1582.
40.
LevensonM. R.KiehlK. A.FitzpatrickC. M. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 151–158.
41.
LishnerD. A.HongP. Y.JiangL.VitaccoM. J.NeumannC. S. (2015). Psychopathy, narcissism, and borderline personality: A critical test of the affective empathy-impairment hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 257–265.
42.
LiuC.LiaoJ. (2021). CAN algorithm: An individual level approach to identify consequence and norm sensitivities and overall action/inaction preferences in moral decision-making. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 547916. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.547916
43.
LukeD. M.GawronskiB. (2021a). Psychopathy and moral dilemma judgments: A CNI model analysis of personal and perceived societal standards. Social Cognition, 39, 41–58.
44.
LukeD. M.GawronskiB. (2021b). Temporal stability of moral dilemma judgments: A longitudinal analysis using the CNI model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211035024
45.
LynamD. R.HoyleR. H.NewmanJ. P. (2006). The perils of partialling: Cautionary tales from aggression and psychopathy. Assessment, 13, 328–341.
46.
LynamD. R.MillerJ. D.DerefinkoK. J. (2018). Psychopathy and personality: An articulation of the benefits of a trait-based approach. In PatrickC. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 259–280). Guilford.
47.
MarshallJ.WattsA. L.LilienfeldS. O. (2018). Do psychopathic individuals possess a misaligned moral compass? A meta-analytic examination of psychopathy’s relations with moral judgment. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9, 40–50.
48.
McGuireJ.BrüneM.LangdonR. (2017). Outcome-focused judgements of moral dilemmas in schizophrenia. Consciousness and Cognition, 52, 21–31.
49.
MoshagenM. (2010). MultiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 42–54.
50.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.).
51.
NeumannC. S.HareR. D.NewmanJ. P. (2007). The super-ordinate nature of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 102–117.
52.
NeumannC. S.HareR. D.PardiniD. A. (2015). Antisociality and the construct of psychopathy: Data from across the globe. Journal of Personality, 83, 678–692.
53.
NeumannC. S.PardiniD. (2014). Factor structure and construct validity of the Self-Report Psychopathy (SRP) Scale and the Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory (YPI) in young men. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 419–433.
54.
OlverM. E.StockdaleK. C.NeumannC. S.HareR. D.MokrosA.Baskin-SommersA.BrandE.FolinoJ.GaconoC.GrayN. S.KiehlK.KnightR.Leon-MayerE.LoganM.MeloyJ. R.RoyS.SalekinR. T.SnowdenR.ThomsonN.. . . YoonD. (2020). Reliability and validity of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in the assessment of risk for institutional violence: A cautionary note on DeMatteo et al. (2020). Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 26, 490–510.
55.
OppenheimerD. M.MeyvisT.DavidenkoN. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867–872.
56.
PardiniD. A.RaineA.EricksonK.LoeberR. (2014). Lower amygdala volume in men is associated with childhood aggression, early psychopathic traits, and future violence. Biological Psychiatry, 75, 73–80.
57.
PatilI.LarsenE. M.KichicR.GleichgerrchtE. (2020). Moral cognition about harm in anxiety disorders: The importance of experienced emotion. Psychological Reports. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120964134
58.
PatilI.MelsbachJ.Hennig-FastK.SilaniG. (2016). Divergent roles of autistic and alexithymic traits in utilitarian moral judgments in adults with autism. Scientific Reports, 6, Article 23637. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23637
59.
PatilI.SilaniG. (2014). Reduced empathic concern leads to utilitarian moral judgments in trait alexithymia. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 501. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00501
60.
PaulhusD. L.NeumannC. S.HareR. D. (2009). Manual for the Self-Report Psychopathy Scale. Multi-Health Systems.
61.
PaulhusD. L.NeumannC. S.HareR. D. (2017). Manual of the Hare Self-Report Psychopathy Scale. Multi-Health Systems.
62.
PeerE.BrandimarteL.SamatS.AcquistiA. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163.
63.
RoyS.VizeC.UziebloK.van DongenJ. D.MillerJ.LynamD.BrazilI.YoonD.MokrosA.GrayN. S.SnowdenR.NeumannC. S. (2020). Triarchic or septarchic?—Uncovering the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure’s (TriPM) structure. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 12(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000392
64.
SalekinR. T.ChenD. R.SellbomM.LesterW. S.MacDougallE. (2014). Examining the factor structure and convergent and discriminant validity of the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale: Is the two-factor model the best fitting model?Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5, 289–304.
65.
Seara-CardosoA.DolbergH.NeumannC. S.RosierJ. P.VidingE. (2013). Empathy, morality, and psychopathic traits in women. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 328–333.
66.
Seara-CardosoA.NeumannC. S.RoiserJ. P.McCroryE.VidingE. (2012). Investigating associations between empathy, morality, and psychopathic personality traits in the general population. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 67–71.
67.
Seara-CardosoA.QueirósA.FernandesE.CoutinoJ.NeumannC. S. (2020). Psychometric properties and construct validity of the short version of the Self-Report Psychopathy Scale in a southern European sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102, 457–468.
68.
Seara-CardosoA.VidingE. (2015). Functional neuroscience of psychopathic personality in adults. Journal of Personality, 83, 723–737.
69.
ThomsonJ. J. (1985). The trolley problem. Yale Law Journal, 94, 1395–1415.
70.
VitaccoM. J.NeumannC. S.CaldwellM. F.LeisticoA. M.Van RybroekG. J. (2006). Testing factor models of the Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version and their association with instrumental aggression. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 74–83.
71.
VitaccoM. J.NeumannC. S.JacksonR. (2005). Testing a four-factor model of psychopathy and its association with ethnicity, gender, intelligence, and violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 466–476.
72.
WalshH. C.RoyS.LasslettH. E.NeumannC. S. (2019). Differences and similarities in how psychopathic traits predict attachment insecurity in females and males. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 41, 537–548.
73.
WhittonA. E.HenryJ. D.GrishamJ. R. (2014). Moral rigidity in obsessive-compulsive disorder: Do abnormalities in inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility and disgust play a role?Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 45, 152–159.
74.
YoderK. J.HarenskiC.KiehlK. A.DecetyJ. (2015). Neural networks underlying implicit and explicit moral evaluations in psychopathy. Translational Psychiatry, 5(8), Article e625. https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2015.117
75.
ZhangX.WuZ.LiS.LaiJ.HanM.ChenX.LiuC.DingD. (2020). Why people with high alexithymia make more utilitarian judgments: The role of empathic concern and deontological inclinations. Experimental Psychology, 67(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000474
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
