Mobile technologies are omnipresent across adolescent life and require better characterization of their potential benefits. Adolescents also experience high rates of daily stress so that investigating youths’ technology use in relation to their stress response is of practical importance. We employed experience sampling data from a subset of 115 youths (n = 1,241 time points) who reported on their technology-based coping and assessed how these related to emotion change throughout the day and controlled for important covariates. Models testing for the benefits of moderate use (relative to no or heavy use; i.e., Goldilocks effect) showed a clear pattern of positive effects of moderate coping online, particularly in relation to support seeking and self-distraction. Moderate online coping was adaptive and often fostered declines in negative emotion.
BeckJ. S.BeckA. T. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy. Basics and beyond. The Guilford Press.
6.
ByunY. H.HaM.KwonH. J.ChoiK. H.BurmE.ChoiY.LimM. H.YooS. J.PaikK. C.ChoiH. D.KimN. (2013). Epidemiological characteristics of mobile phone ownership and use in Korean children and adolescents. Environmental Health and Toxicology, 28, Article e2013018. https://doi.org/10.5620/eht.2013.28.e2013018
7.
CarverC. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: Consider the brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 92–100.
8.
ChenE.McLeanK. C.MillerG. E. (2015). Shift-and-persist strategies: Associations with socioeconomic status and the regulation of inflammation among adolescents and their parents. Psychosomatic Medicine, 77(4), 371–382.
9.
CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2014). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606266
10.
ComuladaW. S.SwendemanD.WuN. (2016). Cell phone-based ecological momentary assessment of substance use context for Latino youth in outpatient treatment: Who, what, when and where. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 167, 207–213.
11.
Dillman CarpentierF. R.BrownJ. D.BertocciM.SilkJ. S.ForbesE. E.DahlR. E. (2008). Sad kids, sad media? Applying mood management theory to depressed adolescents’ use of media. Media Psychology, 11(1), 143–166.
12.
DuvenageM.CorreiaH.UinkB.BarberB. L.DonovanC. L.ModeckiK. L. (2020). Technology can sting when reality bites: Adolescents’ frequent online coping is ineffective with momentary stress. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 248-259.
13.
DuvenageM.UinkB.BarberB.DonovanC.CorreiaH.ModeckiK. L. (2018, April12–14). Boom or bust: The emotional impact of youths’ constant connection to technology. In B. Uink, Teens and tech: Spill-over of adolescents’ digital technology use to offline behaviors and wellbeing [Symposium]. Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
14.
DuvenageM.UinkB. N.Zimmer-GembeckM. J.BarberB. L.DonovanC. L.ModeckiK. L. (2019). Ambulatory assessment of adolescent coping: It’s a complicated process. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 29(3), 578–594.
15.
FredricksJ. A.EcclesJ. S. (2006). Is extracurricular participation associated with beneficial outcomes? Concurrent and longitudinal relations. Developmental Psychology, 42(4), 698–713. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.4.698
16.
HarveyE. J.RubinL. F.SmileyS. L.ZhouY.ElmasryH.PearsonJ. L. (2018). Mobile phone ownership is not a serious barrier to participation in studies: Descriptive study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 6(2), Article e21. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8123
17.
JensenM.GeorgeM. J.RussellM. R.OdgersC. L. (2019). Young adolescents’ digital technology use and adolescents’ mental health symptoms: Little evidence of longitudinal or daily linkages. Clinical Psychological Science, 7, 1416–1433. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702619859336
18.
KatzE.BlumlerJ. G.GurevitchM. (1974). The uses and gratifications approach to mass communication. SAGE.
19.
KimJ. Y. (2012). The nonlinear association between Internet using time for non-educational purposes and adolescent health. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, 45(1), 37–46.
20.
La GrecaA. M. (1998). Social anxiety scales for children and adolescents: Manual and instructions for the SASC, SASC-R, SAS-A (Adolescents) and parent versions of these scales. University of Miami.
21.
LazarusR. S. (2000). Toward better research on stress and coping. American Psychologist, 55(6), 665–673.
LorahJ. (2018). Effect size measures for multilevel models: Definition, interpretation, and TIMSS example. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 6(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-018-0061-2
24.
LucianaM. (2013). Adolescent brain development in normality and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 25, 1325–1345.
25.
McCabeK. O.MackL.FleesonW. (2011). A guide to data cleaning in experience-sampling studies. In MehlM. R.ConnerT. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 321–338). The Guilford Press.
26.
MeyerI. H.SchwartzS.FrostD. M. (2008). Social patterning of stress and coping: Does disadvantaged social statuses confer more stress and fewer coping resources?Social Science & Medicine, 67(3), 368–379.
27.
MillerA. B.Eisenlohr-MoulT.GilettaM.HastingsP. D.RudolphK. D.NockM. K.PrinsteinM. J. (2017). A within-person approach to risk for suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior: Examining the roles of depression, stress, and abuse exposure. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85(7), 712–722.
28.
ModeckiK. L.GoldbergR. E.EhrenreichS. E.RussellM.BellmoreA. (2019a). The practicalities and perils of ambulatory assessment’s promise: Introduction to a special section. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 29(3), 542-550.
29.
ModeckiK. L.UinkB.BarberB.CorreiaH. (2019b, March). Capturing real-world risk-taking with ESM: Links with executive function among low-SES youth.Biennial Society for Research in Child Development, Baltimore, MD.
30.
MuñozR. F.BungeE. L.ChenK.SchuellerS. M.BravinJ. I.ShaughnessyE. A.Pérez-StableE. J. (2016). Massive open online interventions: A novel model for delivering behavioral-health services worldwide. Clinical Psychological Science, 4(2), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702615583840
31.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author
32.
Palmier-ClausJ. E.Myin-GermeysI.BarkusE.BentleyL.UdachinaA.DelespaulP. A.LewisS. W.DunnG. (2011). Experience sampling research in individuals with mental illness: Reflections and guidance. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 123(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2010.01596.x
33.
ParkE.KwonM. (2018). Health-related internet use by children and adolescents: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(4), Article e120. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7731
34.
PrzybylskiA. K.WeinsteinN. (2017). A large-scale test of the Goldilocks hypothesis: Quantifying the relations between digital-screen use and the mental well-being of adolescents. Psychological Science, 28(2), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616678438
35.
RasmusS. M.WhitesellN. R.MousseauA.AllenJ. (2020). An intervention science to advance underrepresented perspectives and indigenous self-determination in health. Prevention Science, 21(1), 83–92.
36.
ReynoldsW. M. (2004). The Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale-Second Edition (RADS-2). In HilsenrothM. J.SegalD. L. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment, Vol. 2. Personality assessment (pp. 224–236). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
37.
RideoutV.RobbM. B. (2018). Social media, social life: Teens reveal their experiences. Common Sense Media.
38.
RobertsS. O.Bareket-ShavitC.DollinsF. A.GoldieP. D.MortensonE. (2020). Racial inequality in psychological research: Trends of the past and recommendations for the future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15, 1295–1309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620927709
39.
RomerD.BagdasarovZ.MoreE. (2013). Older versus newer media and the well-being of United States youth: Results from a national longitudinal panel. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(5), 613–619.
40.
SchneidersJ.NicolsonN. A.BerkhofJ.FeronF. J.van OsJ.deVriesM. W. (2006). Mood reactivity to daily negative events in early adolescence: Relationship to risk for psychopathology. Developmental Psychology, 42(3), 543–554.
41.
ShklovskiI.BarkhuusL.BornoeN.KayeJ. J. (2015). Friendship maintenance in the digital age: Applying a relational lens to online social interaction. In CosleyD.ForteA.CiolfiL.McDonalD. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 1477–1487). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675294
42.
SimH. O. (2000). Relationship of daily hassles and social support to depression and antisocial behavior among early adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 647–659.
43.
StaffordT. F.StaffordM. R.SchkadeL. L. (2004). Determining uses and gratifications for the Internet. Decision Sciences, 35(2), 259–288.
44.
StoneA. A.ShiffmanS. (1992). Reflections on the intensive measurement of stress, coping, and mood, with an emphasis on daily measures. Psychology and Health, 7(2), 115–129.
45.
SubrahmanyamK.SmahelD. (2010). Digital youth: The role of media in development. Springer.
46.
ThomasS.HeinrichS.KühnleinA.RadonK. (2010). The association between socioeconomic status and exposure to mobile telecommunication networks in children and adolescents. Bioelectromagnetics, 1(1), 20–27.
47.
UnertlK. M.SchaefbauerC. L.CampbellT. R.SenteioC.SiekK. A.BakkenS.VeinotT. C. (2016). Integrating community-based participatory research and informatics approaches to improve the engagement and health of underserved populations. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(1), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv094
48.
van IngenE.WrightK. B. (2016). Predictors of mobilizing online coping versus offline coping resources after negative life events. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 431–439.
49.
WenC. K. F.SchneiderS.StoneA. A.Spruijt-MetzD. (2017). Compliance with mobile ecological momentary assessment protocols in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19, Article e132. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6641
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
