The therapeutic alliance has been reliably associated with outcome across psychotherapies. We investigated the alliance–outcome relationship in the early sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy of depression using a model that disaggregates within- and between-persons variance while estimating the reciprocal relation between variables. We used this model in a combined data set from two studies totaling 191 patients. In our primary model, we found evidence for a predictive within-patients relationship between alliance and symptoms such that symptoms predicted regressed change in alliance and alliance predicted regressed change in symptoms. In a more conservative detrended model, these relationships were not significant. Given that (a) most of the variability in alliance scores is between patients, (b) the size of the alliance–outcome relationship is modest, and (c) the alliance–outcome relationship is not robust to detrending, our findings suggest that alliance plays at most a small role in improving patient outcomes in cognitive behavioral therapy of depression.
AdlerA. D.StrunkD. R.FazioR. H. (2015). What changes in cognitive therapy for depression? An examination of cognitive therapy skills and maladaptive beliefs. Behavior Therapy, 46, 96–109. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2014.09.001
AllisonP. D. (1990). Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology, 20, 93–114. doi:10.2307/271083
4.
AllisonP. D. (2014). Fixed effects regression methods for longitudinal data using SAS. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
5.
AndrusynaT. P.TangT. Z.DeRubeisR. J.LuborskyL. (2001). The factor structure of the working alliance inventory in cognitive-behavioral therapy. The Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 10, 173–178.
6.
BarberJ. P.Zilcha-ManoS.GallopR.BarrettM.McCarthyK. S.DingerU. (2014). The associations among improvement and alliance expectations, alliance during treatment, and treatment outcome for major depressive disorder. Psychotherapy Research, 24, 257–268. doi:10.1080/10503307.2013.871080
7.
BeckA. T.SteerR. A.BrownB. K. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory manual (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
8.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. A. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2011). The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 583–619. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100356
10.
CurranP. J.HowardA. L.BainterS. A.LaneS. T.McGinleyJ. S. (2014). The separation of between-person and within-person components of individual change over time: A latent curve model with structured residuals. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 879–894. doi:10.1037/a0035297
11.
Ebner-PriemerU.TrullT. (2009). Ecological momentary assessment of mood disorders and mood dysregulation. Psychological Assessment, 21, 463–475. doi:10.1037/a0017075
12.
EubanksC. F.MuranJ. C.SafranJ. D. (2018). Alliance rupture repair: A meta-analysis. Psychotherapy, 55, 508–519. doi:10.1037/pst0000185508
13.
FalkenströmF.FinkelS.SandellR.RubelJ. A.HolmqvistR. (2017). Dynamic models of individual change in psychotherapy process research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85, 537–549. doi:10.1037/ccp0000203
14.
FalkenströmF.GranströmF.HolmqvistR. (2013). Therapeutic alliance predicts symptomatic improvement session by session. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60, 317–328. doi:10.1037/a0032258317
15.
FalkenströmF.GranströmF.HolmqvistR. (2014). Working alliance predicts psychotherapy outcome even while controlling for prior symptom improvement. Psychotherapy Research, 24, 146–159. doi:10.1080/10503307.2013.847985
16.
FalkenströmF.KuriaM.OthienoC.KumarM. (2019). Working alliance predicts symptomatic improvement in public hospital–delivered psychotherapy in Nairobi, Kenya. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 87, 46–55. doi:10.1037/ccp0000363
17.
FalkenströmF.SolomonovN.RubelJ. (2020). Using time-lagged panel data analysis to study mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research: Methodological recommendations. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 20, 435–441. doi:10.1002/capr.12293
18.
FeeleyM.DeRubeisR. J.GelfandL. A. (1999). The temporal relation of adherence and alliance to symptom change in cognitive therapy for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 578–582. doi:10.1037//0022-006x.67.4.578
19.
FirstM. B.SpitzerR. L.GibbonM.WilliamsJ. B. W. (2002). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR axis I disorders, research version, patient edition (SCID-I/P). New York: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute.
20.
FisherH.Atzil-SlonimD.Bar-KalifaE.RafaeliE.PeriT. (2016). Emotional experience and alliance contribute to therapeutic change in psychodynamic therapy. Psychotherapy, 53, 105–116. doi:10.1037/pst0000041
21.
FlückigerC.Del ReA. C.WampoldB. E.HorvathA. O. (2018). The alliance in adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychotherapy, 55, 316–340. doi:10.1037/pst0000172
22.
HamakerE. L.KuiperR. M.GrasmanR. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20, 102–116. doi:10.1037/a0038889
23.
HofmannS. G.HayesS. C. (2019). The future of intervention science: Process-based therapy. Clinical Psychological Science, 7, 37–50. doi:10.1177/2167702618772296
24.
HorvathA. O.GreenbergL. S. (1989). Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 223–233. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.223
25.
Lorenzo-LuacesL.DeRubeisR. J.WebbC. A. (2014). Client characteristics as moderators of the relation between the therapeutic alliance and outcome in cognitive therapy for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 368–373. doi:10.1037/a0035994
26.
MartinD. J.GarskeJ. P.DavisM. K. (2000). Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 438–450. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.68.3.438
27.
MuranJ. C.BarberJ. P. (Eds.). (2011). The therapeutic alliance: An evidence-based guide to practice. New York, NY: Guilford.
28.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
29.
RubelJ. A.RosenbaumD.LutzW. (2017). Patients’ in-session experiences and symptom change: Session-to-session effects on a within-and between-patient level. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 90, 58–66. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2016.12.007
30.
SassoK. E.StrunkD. R.BraunJ. D.DeRubeisR. J.BrotmanM. A. (2016). A re-examination of process–outcome relations in cognitive therapy for depression: Disaggregating within-patient and between-patient effects. Psychotherapy Research, 26, 387–398. doi:10.1080/10503307.2015.1026423
31.
SchmidtI. D.PfeiferB. J.StrunkD. R. (2019). Putting the “cognitive” back in cognitive therapy: Sustained cognitive change as a mediator of in-session insights and depressive symptom improvement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 87, 446–456. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2010.03.011
32.
SievJ.HuppertJ. D.ChamblessD. L. (2009). The dodo bird, treatment technique, and disseminating empirically supported treatments. the Behavior Therapist, 32, 69–76.
33.
TraceyT. J.KokotovicA. M. (1989). Factor structure of the Working Alliance Inventory. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1, 207–210. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.1.3.207
34.
WangL. P.MaxwellS. E. (2015). On disaggregating between-person and within-person effects with longitudinal data using multilevel models. Psychological Methods, 20, 63–83. doi:10.1037/met0000030
35.
WebbC. A.BeardC.AuerbachR. P.MenningerE.BjörgvinssonT. (2014). The therapeutic alliance in a naturalistic psychiatric setting: Temporal relations with depressive symptom change. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 61, 70–77. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2014.07.015
36.
XuH.TraceyT. J. G. (2015). Reciprocal influence model of working alliance and therapeutic outcome over individual therapy course. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62, 351–359. doi:10.1037/cou0000089
37.
Zilcha-ManoS. (2018). Major developments in methods addressing for whom psychotherapy may work and why. Psychotherapy Research, 29, 693–708. doi:10.1080/10503307.2018.1429691
38.
Zilcha-ManoS.DingerU.McCarthyK. S.BarberJ. P. (2014). Does alliance predict symptoms throughout treatment, or is it the other way around?Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 931–935. doi:10.1037/a0035141
39.
Zilcha-ManoS.ErrázurizP. (2015). One size does not fit all: Examining heterogeneity and identifying moderators of the alliance–outcome association. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62, 579–591. doi:10.1037/cou0000103
40.
Zilcha-ManoS.EubanksC. F.MuranJ. C. (2019). Sudden gains in the alliance in cognitive behavioral therapy versus brief relational therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 87, 501–509. doi:10.1037/ccp0000397
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
