Although dynamic risk factors are considered important in the assessment and treatment of adult male sex offenders, little is known about their interrelationships. We apply network analysis to assess their associations and to provide an analysis of their shortest pathways to sexual and violent (including sexual contact) recidivism. Analyses revealed a central position for general rejection/loneliness (in all networks), poor cognitive problem solving (in networks containing sexual or violent—including sexual contact—recidivism), and impulsive acts (only in the network including sexual recidivism). These variables represented links between clusters of dynamic risk factors composed of factors relating to sexual self-regulation, emotionally intimate relationships, antisocial traits, and self-management. Impulsive acts showed the strongest independent association with sexual and violent (including sexual contact) recidivism.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis, Matthew Bender.
2.
BeechA. R.FisherD. D.ThorntonD. (2003). Risk assessment of sex offenders. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 339–352. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.34.4.339
3.
BoerD. J.HaavenJ.LambrickF.LindsayW. R.McVillyK. R.SakdalanJ. A.FrizeM. C. J. (2013). The Assessment of Risk and Manageability of Intellectually Disabled IndividuaLs who Offend – Sexually (ARMIDILO-S). Retrieved from http://www.armidilo.net/files/Web-Version-1-1-2013-Intro-Manual.pdf
4.
BontaJ.AndrewsD. A. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
BorsboomD. (2017). A network theory of mental disorders. World Psychiatry, 16, 5–13. doi:10.1002/wps.20375
6.
BorsboomD.CramerA. O. (2013). Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 91–121. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608
7.
BorsboomD.CramerA.KalisA. (2019). Brain disorders? Not really . . . why network structures block reductionism in psychopathology research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42, Article e2. doi:10.1017/S0140525X17002266
8.
BorsboomD.FriedE. I.EpskampS.WaldorpL. J.van BorkuloC. D.van der MaasH. L. J.CramerA. O. J. (2017). False alarm? A comprehensive reanalysis of “Evidence that psychopathology symptom networks have limited replicability” by Forbes, Wright, Markon, and Krueger (2017). Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126, 989–999. doi:10.1037/abn0000306
9.
BrankleyA. E.BabchishinK. M.HansonR. K. (2019). STABLE-2007 demonstrates predictive and incremental validity in assessing risk-relevant propensities for sexual offending: A meta-analysis. Sexual Abuse. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1079063219871572
10.
BrigantiG.KempenaersC.BraunS.FriedE. I.LinkowskiP. (2018). Network analysis of empathy items from the interpersonal reactivity index in 1973 young adults. Psychiatry Research, 265, 87–92. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.082
Brouillette-AlarieS.BabchishinK. M.HansonR. K.HelmusL. M. (2016). Latent constructs of the Static-99R and Static-2002R: A three-factor solution. Assessment, 23, 96–111. doi:10.1177/1073191114568114
13.
CortoniF.HansonR. K.CoacheM-E. (2010). The recidivism rates of female sexual offenders are low: A meta-analysis. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 387–401. doi:10.1177/1079063210372142
14.
CostantiniG.EpskampS.BorsboomD.PeruginiM.MottusR.WaldorpL. J.CramerA. O. J. (2015). State of the aRt personality research: A tutorial on network analysis of personality data in R. Journal of Research in Personality, 54, 13–29. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.003
DemetriouA.SpanoudisG.KaziS.MouyiA.ŽebecM. S.KazaliE.. . . ShayerM. (2017). Developmental differentiation and binding of mental processes with g through the life-span. Journal of Intelligence, 5, 1–31. doi:10.3390/jintelligence5020023
17.
EherR.MatthesA.SchillingF.Haubner-MacLeanT.RettenbergerM. (2012). Dynamic risk assessment in sexual offenders using the Stable-2000 and the Stable-2007: An investigation of predictive and incremental validity. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 5–28. doi:10.1177/1079063211403164
18.
EherR.RettenbergerM.GaunersdorferK.Haubner-MacLeanT.MatthesA.SchillingF.MokrosA. (2013). Über die Treffsicherheit der standardisierten Risikoeinschätzungsverfahren Static-99 und Stable-2007 bei aus einer Sicherungsmaßnahme entlassenen Sexualstraftätern [On the accuracy of the standardized risk assessment procedures Static-99 and Stable-2007 for sexual offenders released from detention]. Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie, 7, 264–272. doi:10.1007/s11757-013-0212-9
19.
EpskampS.BorsboomD.FriedE. I. (2018). Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavioral Research Methods, 50, 195–212. doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1
20.
EpskampS.CramerA. O.WaldorpL. J.SchmittmannV. D.BorsboomD. (2012). Qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–18. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i04
21.
EpskampS.FriedE. I. (2017). A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. ArXiv. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.01367.pdf
EtzlerS.EherR.RettenbergerM. (2020). Dynamic risk assessment of sexual offenders: Validity and dimensional structure of the Stable-2007. Assessment, 27, 822–839. doi:10.1177/1073191118754705
24.
FernandezY.HarrisA. J. R.HansonR. K.SparksJ. (2014). Stable-2007 Coding Manual: Revised 2014. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Public Safety Canada.
25.
FriedE. I.van BorkuloC. D.CramerA. O. J.BoschlooL.SchoeversR. A.BorsboomD. (2017). Mental disorders as networks of problems: A review of recent insights. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 52, 1–10. doi:10.1007/s00127-016-1319-z
26.
GolinoH. F.EpskampS. (2017) Exploratory graph analysis: A new approach for estimating the number of dimensions in psychological research. PLOS ONE, 12, Article e0174035. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174035
27.
HansonR. K.BourgonG.HelmusL.HodgsonS. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 9, 865–891. doi:10.1177/0093854809338545
28.
HansonR. K.BussièreM. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sex offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348–362. doi:10.1037//0022-006x.66.2.348
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154–1163. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154
32.
HaslbeckJ.WaldorpL. J. (2016). Mgm: Structure estimation for time-varying mixed graphical models in high-dimensional data. ArXiv. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1510.06871v2
33.
HeffernanR.WardT. (2017). A comprehensive theory of dynamic risk and protective factors. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37, 129–141. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2017.10.003
34.
HelmusL. M.BabchishinK. M. (2017). Primer on risk assessment and the statistics used to evaluate its accuracy. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44, 8–25. doi:10.1177/0093854816678898
35.
HelmusL.HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M.MannR. E. (2013). Attitudes supportive of sexual offending predict recidivism: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 14, 34–53. doi:10.1177/1524838012462244
36.
HöingM. A. (2015). Empowering circles: Circles of support and accountability. Oosterhout, The Netherlands: OCC De Hoog B.V.
37.
IsvoranuA-M.van BorkuloC. D.BoyetteL-L.WigmanJ. T. W.VinkersC. H.BorsboomD.Group Investigators (2017). A network approach to psychosis: Pathways between childhood trauma and psychotic symptoms. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 43, 187–196. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbw055
38.
JonesP. J.MairP.McNallyR. J. (2018). Visualizing psychological networks: A tutorial in R. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1742. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01742
39.
KnightR. A.ThorntonD. (2007). Evaluating and improving risk assessment schemes for sexual recidivism: A long-term follow-up of convicted sexual offenders (Document No. 217618). Rockville, MD: National Criminal Justice Reference Service, U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/217618.pdf
40.
LangleyD. J.WijnR.EpskampS.van BorkR. (2015). Should I get that jab? Exploring influence to encourage vaccination via online social media. ECIS 2015 Research-in-Progress Papers (Paper 64). Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1063&context=ecis2015_rip
41.
MalamuthN. M. (1986). Predictors of naturalistic sexual aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 953–962. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.953
42.
MalamuthN. M. (2003). Criminal and non-criminal sexual aggressors: Integrating psychopathy in a hierarchical-mediational confluence sex roles model. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 33–58. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07292.x.
43.
MalamuthN. M.HaldG. M. (2016). The confluence mediational model of sexual aggression. In BoerD.BeechA. R.WardT. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook on the theories, assessment and treatment of sexual offending (Vol. 1, pp. 53–71). London, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
44.
MalamuthN. M.LinzD.HeaveyC. L.BarnesG.AckerM. (1995). Using the confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men’s conflict with women: A 10-year follow-up study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 353–369.
McNallyR. J. (2016). Can network analysis transform psychopathology?Behaviour Research and Therapy, 86, 95–104. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.006
47.
OpsahlT.AgneessensF.SkvoretzJ. (2010). Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks, 32, 245–251. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.006
48.
ReichardtJ.BornholdtS. (2008). Statistical mechanics of community detection. Physical Review E, 74, Article 16110. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.74.016110
49.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
50.
SchmuckerM.LöselF. (2015). The effects of sexual offender treatment on recidivism: An international meta-analysis of sound quality evaluations. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11, 597–630. doi:10.1007/s11292-015-9241-z
51.
SetoM. C. (2019). The motivation-facilitation model of sexual offending. Sexual Abuse, 31, 3–24. doi:10.1177/1079063217720919
52.
SmethA. (2013). Evaluating risk assessment among sex offenders: A comparative analysis of static and dynamic factors (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Retrieved from https://curve.carleton.ca/system/files/theses/27517_1.pdf
53.
SmidW. J.WeverE. C. (2019). Mixed emotions: An incentive motivational model of sexual deviance. Sexual Abuse, 31, 731–764. doi:10.1177/1079063218775972
54.
SowdenJ. N. (2013). Examining the relationship of risk, treatment readiness, and therapeutic change to recidivism in a sample of treated sex offenders (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Saskatchewan, Canada. Retrieved from https://harvest.usask.ca/handle/10388/ETD-2013-11-1305
55.
StinsonJ. D.BeckerJ. V. (2013). Treating sex offenders: An evidence-based manual. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
56.
StinsonJ. D.BeckerJ. V.McVayL. A. (2016). Multimodal self-regulation theory of sexual offending, In BoerD.BeechA. R.WardT. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook on the theories, assessment and treatment of sexual offending (Vol. 1, pp. 103–122). London, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
57.
StinsonJ. D.BeckerJ. V.SalesB. D. (2008). Self-regulation and the etiology of sexual deviance: Evaluating causal theory. Violence and Victims, 23, 35–51. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.23.1.35
58.
ThorntonD. (2002). Constructing and testing a framework for dynamic risk assessment. Sexual Abuse, 14, 139–153. doi:10.1023/A:1014620214905
59.
ThorntonD. (2013). Implications of our developing understanding of risk and protective factors in the treatment of adult male sexual offenders. International Journal of Behavioral and Consultation Therapy, 8, 3–4. doi:10.1037/h0100985
60.
ToatesF.SmidW.van den BergJ. W. (2017). A framework for understanding sexual violence: Incentive-motivation and hierarchical control. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 34, 238–253. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2017.01.001
61.
van BorkuloC. D.BorsboomD.EpskampS.BlankenT. F.BoschlooL.SchoeversR. A.WaldorpL. J. (2014). A new method for constructing networks from binary data. Scientific Reports, 4, 1–10. doi:10.1038/srep05918
62.
van den BergJ. W.SmidW.SchepersK.WeverE.van BeekD.JanssenE.GijsL. (2018). The predictive properties of dynamic sex offender risk assessment instruments: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 30, 179–191. doi:10.1037/pas0000454
63.
WardT.BeechA. R. (2016). The integrated theory of sexual offending – revised. A multifield perspective, In BoerD.BeechA. R.WardT. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook on the theories, assessment and treatment of sexual offending (Vol. 1, pp. 123–138). London, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
64.
WardT.FortuneC. (2016). From dynamic risk factors to causal processes: A methodological framework. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22, 190–202. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2015.1117080
65.
WardT.PolaschekD.BeechA. R. (2006). Theories of sexual offending. Chichester, England: John Wiley.
66.
WilsonR. J.CortoniF.McWhinnieA. W. (2009). Circles of support & accountability: A Canadian national replication of outcome findings. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 412–430. doi:10.1177/1079063209347724
67.
WilsonR. J.PichecaJ. E.PrinzoM. (2005). Research report—Circles of support & accountability: An evaluation of the pilot project in South-Central Ontario. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Correctional Services of Canada. Retrieved from http://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/research/092/r168_e.pdf
68.
WongS. C. P.OlverM. E.NicholaichukT. P.GordonA. E. (2003). The Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender Version (VRS:SO). Saskatoon, SK, Canada: Regional Psychiatric Centre and University of Saskatchewan.
69.
YangZ.AlgesheimerR.TessoneC. J. (2016). A comparative analysis of community detection algorithms on artificial networks. Scientific Reports, 6, 1–18. doi:10.1038/srep30750
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
