Individuals higher in trait worry exhibit increased activation in Broca’s area during inhibitory processing tasks. To identify whether such activity represents an adaptive mechanism supporting top-down control, we investigated functional and effective connectivity of Broca’s area during a task of inhibitory control. Functional MRI data obtained from 106 participants performing an emotion-word Stroop task were examined using psychophysiological interaction and Granger causality (GC) analyses. Findings revealed greater directed connectivity from Broca’s area to amygdala in the presence of emotional distraction. Furthermore, a predictive relationship was observed between worry and the asymmetry in effective connectivity; worriers exhibited greater directed connectivity from Broca’s area to amygdala. When performing the task, worriers with greater GC directional asymmetry were more accurate than worriers with less asymmetry. Present findings indicate that individuals with elevated trait worry use a mechanism of top-down control in which communication from Broca’s area to amygdala fosters successful compensation for interference effects.
AstolfiL.De Vico FallaniF.CincottiF.MattiaD.MarcianiM. G.BufalariS.. . . BabiloniF. (2007). Imaging functional brain connectivity patterns from high-resolution EEG and fMRI via graph theory. Psychophysiology, 44, 880–893. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00556.x
2.
AwhE.JonidesJ.SmithE. E.SchumacherE. H.KoeppeR. A.KatzS. (1996). Dissociation of storage and rehearsal in verbal working memory: Evidence from positron emission tomography. Psychological Science, 7, 25–31. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00662.x
3.
BadreD.WagnerA. D. (2007). Left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the cognitive control of memory. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2883–2901. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.06.015
4.
BanksS. J.EddyK. T.AngstadtM.NathanP. J.PhanK. L. (2007). Amygdala–frontal connectivity during emotion regulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2, 303–312. doi:10.1093/scan/nsm029
5.
BartholomewM. E.YeeC. M.HellerW.MillerG. A.SpielbergJ. M. (2019). Reconfiguration of brain networks supporting inhibition of emotional challenge. NeuroImage, 186, 350–357. doi:S105381191832038X
6.
BeaudreauS. A.MacKay-BrandtA.ReynoldsJ. (2013). Application of a cognitive neuroscience perspective of cognitive control to late-life anxiety. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 27, 559–566. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.03.006
7.
BerenbaumH. (2010). An initiation–termination two-phase model of worrying. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 962–975.
8.
BorkovecT.AlcaineO.BeharE. (2004). Avoidance theory of worry and generalized anxiety disorder. In HeimbergR. G.TurkC. L.MenninD. S. (Eds.), Generalized anxiety disorder: Advances in research and practice (pp. 77–108). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
9.
BorkovecT. D. (1994). The nature, functions, and origins of worry. In DaveyG. C. L.TallisF. (Eds.), Worrying: Perspectives on theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 5–33). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.
10.
BradleyM. M.LangP. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings.Technical report C-1, the Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
11.
BresslerS. L.TangW.SylvesterC. M.ShulmanG. L.CorbettaM. (2008). Top-down control of human visual cortex by frontal and parietal cortex in anticipatory visual spatial attention. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 10056–10061. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1776-08.2008
12.
CarterC.MacdonaldA.BotvinickM.RossL. L.StengerV.NollD.CohenJ. D. (2000). Parsing executive processes: Strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 97, 1944–1948. doi:10.1073/pnas.97.4.1944
13.
CaulfieldK. A.Tyler KetchabawW.Pascual-LeoneA.PressD. Z.SternA. P. (2016). Reductions in depression and anxiety measures are correlated in patients receiving transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Stimulation, 9(5), Article e9. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.028
De RaedtR.KosterE. (2010). Understanding vulnerability for depression from a cognitive neuroscience perspective: A reappraisal of attentional factors and a new conceptual framework. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 50–70. doi:10.3758/CABN.10.1.50
16.
DolcosF.KragelP.WangL.McCarthyG. (2006). Role of the inferior frontal cortex in coping with distracting emotions. NeuroReport, 17, 1591–1594. doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000236860.24081.be
17.
EngelsA. S.HellerW.MohantyA.HerringtonJ. D.BanichM. T.WebbA. G.MillerG. A. (2007). Specificity of regional brain activity in anxiety types during emotion processing. Psychophysiology, 44, 352–363. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00518.x
18.
EysenckM. W.DerakshanN.SantosR.CalvoM. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7, 336–353. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336
19.
FalquezR.CoutoB.IbanezA.FreitagM. T.BergerM.ArensE. A.. . . BarnowS. (2014). Detaching from the negative by reappraisal: The role of right superior frontal gyrus (BA9/32). Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, Article 165. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00165
20.
GoergG. M. (2015). The Lambert way to Gaussianize heavy-tailed data with the inverse of Tukey’s h transformation as a special case. Scientific World Journal, 2015, Article 909231. doi:10.1155/2015/909231
21.
GrangerC. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37, 424–438. doi:10.2307/1912791
22.
GrossJ. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39, 281–291. doi:10.1017/S0048577201393198
23.
HamiltonJ. P.ChenG.ThomasonM. E.SchwartzM. E.GotlibI. H. (2011). Investigating neural primacy in Major Depressive Disorder: Multivariate Granger causality analysis of resting-state fMRI time-series data. Molecular Psychiatry, 16, 763–772. doi:10.1038/mp.2010.46
24.
HanH. J.LeeK.KimH. T.KimH. (2014). Distinctive amygdala subregions involved in emotion-modulated Stroop interference. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 689–698. doi:10.1093/scan/nst021
25.
HaufeS.NikulinV. V.MüllerK. R.NolteG. (2013). A critical assessment of connectivity measures for EEG data: A simulation study. NeuroImage, 64, 120–133. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.036
26.
HerringtonJ. D.MohantyA.KovenN. S.FisherJ. E.StewartJ. L.BanichM. T.. . . HellerW. (2005). Emotion-modulated performance and activity in left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Emotion, 5, 200–207. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.2.200
27.
HirschC. R.MathewsA. (2012). A cognitive model of pathological worry. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50, 636–646. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2012.06.007
28.
HopfingerJ. B.WoldorffM. G.FletcherE. M.MangunG. R. (2001). Dissociating top-down attentional control from selective perception and action. Neuropsychologia, 39, 1277–1291. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00117-8
29.
IronsideM.BrowningM.AnsariT.HarveyC.Sekyi-DjanM.BishopS.. . . SheaJ. (2017). Prefrontal cortex regulates amygdala response to threat in trait anxiety. BioRxiv, Article 215699. doi:10.1101/215699
30.
JanuaryD.TrueswellJ. C.Thompson-SchillS. L. (2009). Co-localization of Stroop and syntactic ambiguity resolution in Broca’s area: Implications for the neural basis of sentence processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 2434–2444. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21179
31.
JenkinsonM.BeckmannC. F.BehrensT. E.WoolrichM. W.SmithS. M. (2012). Fsl. NeuroImage, 62, 782–790.
32.
JohnstoneT.van ReekumC. M.UrryH. L.KalinN. H.DavidsonR. J. (2007). Failure to regulate: Counterproductive recruitment of top-down prefrontal-subcortical circuitry in major depression. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 8877–8884. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2063-07.2007
33.
KertzS. J.BeldenA. C.TillmanR.LubyJ. (2016). Cognitive control deficits in shifting and inhibition in preschool age children are associated with increased depression and anxiety over 7.5 years of development. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44, 1185–1196. doi:10.1007/s10802-015-0101-0
34.
LuoQ.GeT.GrabenhorstF.FengJ.RollsE. T. (2013). Attention-dependent modulation of cortical taste circuits revealed by Granger causality with signal-dependent noise. PLOS Computational Biology, 9(10), Article e1003265. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003265
35.
LutzJ.HerwigU.OpiallaS.HittmeyerA.JänckeL.RuferM.. . . BrühlA. B. (2013). Mindfulness and emotion regulation—An fMRI study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 776–785. doi:10.1093/scan/nst043
36.
MacLeodC. M. (1992). The Stroop task: The “gold standard” of attentional measures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 12–14. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.121.1.12
37.
MathewsA.MacleodC. (1985). Selective cues processing in anxiety of threat. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23, 563–569. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(90)90160-K
38.
MathewsA.RidgewayV.WilliamsonD. A. (1996). Evidence for attention to threatening stimuli in depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 695–705. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(96)00046-0
39.
McLarenD. G.RiesM. L.XuG.JohnsonS. C. (2012). A generalized form of context-dependent psychophysiological interactions (gPPI): A comparison to standard approaches. NeuroImage, 61, 1277–1286. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.068
40.
MeadL. A.MayerA. R.BobholzJ. A.WoodleyS. J.CunninghamJ. M.HammekeT. A.RaoS. M. (2002). Neural basis of the Stroop interference task: Response competition or selective attention?Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 735–742. doi:10.1017/S1355617702860015
41.
MeyerT. J.MillerM. L.MetzgerR. L.BorkovecT. D. (1990). Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 487–495. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(90)90135-6
42.
MilhamM. P.BanichM. T.BaradV. (2003). Competition for priority in processing increases prefrontal cortex’s involvement in top-down control: An event-related fMRI study of the Stroop task. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 212–222. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00108-3
43.
MillerG.A.ChapmanJ.P. (2001). Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 40–48.
44.
MillerG. A. (2010). Mistreating psychology in the decades of the brain. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 716–743. doi:10.1177/1745691610388774
45.
MoggK.BradleyB. P. (2005). Attentional bias in generalized anxiety disorder versus depressive disorder. Cognitive therapy and research, 29, 29–45. doi:10.1007/s10608-005-1646-y
46.
MoggK.MathewsA.WeinmanJ. (1989). Selective processing of threat cues in anxiety states: A replication. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 27, 317–323. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(89)90001-6
47.
MorinA.MichaudJ. (2007). Self-awareness and the left inferior frontal gyrus: Inner speech use during self-related processing. Brain Research Bulletin, 74, 387–396. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.06.013
48.
NelsonJ. K.Reuter-LorenzP. A.SylvesterC. Y.JonidesJ.SmithE. E. (2003). Dissociable neural mechanisms underlying response-based and familiarity-based conflict in working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 100, 11171–11175. doi:10.1073/pnas.1334125100
49.
NewmanM. G.LleraS. J. (2011). A novel theory of experiential avoidance in generalized anxiety disorder: A review and synthesis of research supporting a contrast avoidance model of worry. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 371–382.
50.
NitschkeJ. B.HellerW.ImigJ. C.McDonaldR. P.MillerG. A. (2001). Distinguishing dimensions of anxiety and depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25, 1–22. doi:10.1023/A:1026485530405
51.
NitschkeJ. B.HellerW.MillerG. A. (2000). Anxiety, stress, and cortical brain function. In BorodJ. C. (Ed.), Series in affective science: The neuropsychology of emotion (pp. 298–319). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
52.
NovickJ. M.TrueswellJ. C.Thompson-SchillS. L. (2010). Broca’s area and language processing: Evidence for the cognitive control connection. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4, 906–924. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00244.x
53.
OttavianiC.BorlimiR.BrighettiG.CaselliG.FavarettoE.GiardiniI.SassaroliS. (2014). Worry as an adaptive avoidance strategy in healthy controls but not in pathological worriers. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 93, 349–355.
54.
PopovT.WestnerB. U.SiltonR. L.SassS. M.SpielbergJ. M.RockstrohB.. . . MillerG. A. (2018). Time course of brain network reconfiguration supporting inhibitory control. The Journal of Neuroscience, 38, 4348–4356. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2639-17.2018
55.
RamseyJ. D.HansonS. J.HansonC.HalchenkoY. O.PoldrackR. A.GlymourC. (2010). Six problems for causal inference from fMRI. NeuroImage, 49, 1545–1558.
56.
RayR. D.ZaldD. H. (2012). Anatomical insights into the interaction of emotion and cognition in the prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 479–501. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.08.005
57.
RoebroeckA.FormisanoE.GoebelR. (2005). Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI. NeuroImage, 25, 230–242. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.017.
58.
SassS. M.HellerW.FisherJ. E.SiltonR. L.StewartJ. L.CrockerL. D.. . . MillerG. A.Electrophysiological evidence of the time course of attentional bias in non-patients reporting symptoms of depression with and without co-occurring anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 301. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00301
59.
SassS. M.HellerW.StewartJ. L.SiltonR. L.EdgarJ. C.FisherJ. E.MillerG. A. (2010). Time course of attentional bias in anxiety: Emotion and gender specificity. Psychophysiology, 47, 247–259. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00926.x
60.
SethA. K.BarrettA. B.BarnettL. (2015). Granger causality analysis in neuroscience and neuroimaging. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 3293–7. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4399-14.2015
61.
SiltonR. L.HellerW.EngelsA. S.TowersD. N.SpielbergJ. M.EdgarJ. C.. . . MillerG. A. (2011). Depression and anxious apprehension distinguish frontocingulate cortical activity during top-down attentional control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 272–85. doi:10.1037/a0023204
62.
SpielbergJ. M.De LeonA. A.BredemeierK.HellerW.EngelsA. S.WarrenS. L.. . . MillerG. A. (2013). Anxiety type modulates immediate versus delayed engagement of attention-related brain regions. Brain and Behavior, 3, 532–551. doi:10.1002/brb3.157
63.
SpielbergJ. M.MillerG. A.HellerW.BanichM. T. (2015). Flexible brain network reconfiguration supporting inhibitory control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 112, 10020–10025. doi:10.1073/pnas.1500048112
64.
SpielbergJ. M.MillerG. A.WarrenS. L.SuttonB. P.BanichM.HellerW. (2014). Transdiagnostic dimensions of anxiety and depression moderate motivation-related brain networks during goal maintenance. Depression and Anxiety, 31, 805–813. doi:10.1002/da.22271
65.
StapinskiL. A.AbbottM. J.RapeeR. M. (2010). Evaluating the cognitive avoidance model of generalised anxiety disorder: Impact of worry on threat appraisal, perceived control and anxious arousal. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 1032–1040.
66.
StokesP. A.PurdonP. L. (2017). A study of problems encountered in Granger causality analysis from a neuroscience perspective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 114, E7063–E7072.
67.
TangeO. (2011). GNU Parallel: The command-line power tool. Login: The USENIX Magazine, 36, 42–47. doi:10.5281/zenodo.16303
68.
VeronaE.MillerG.A. (2015). Analysis of covariance. In CautinR. L.LilienfeldS. O. (Eds.), The encyclopedia of clinical psychology (pp. 136-142). New York, NY: Wiley.
69.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.WeberK.AssenheimerJ. S., et al. (1995). Testing a tripartite model: II. Exploring the symptom structure of anxiety and depression in student, adult, and patient samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 15–25. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.104.1.15
70.
WenX.YaoL.LiuY.DingM. (2012). Causal interactions in attention networks predict behavioral performance. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 1284–1292. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2817-11.2012
71.
WinklerA. M.RidgwayG. R.WebsterM. A.SmithS. M.NicholsT. E. (2014). Permutation inference for the general linear model. NeuroImage, 92, 381–397. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.060
72.
WinklerI.HaufeS.PorbadnigkA. K.MüllerK. R.DähneS. (2015). Identifying Granger causal relationships between neural power dynamics and variables of interest. NeuroImage, 111, 489–504. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.059
73.
YiendJ. (2010). The effects of emotion on attention: A review of attentional processing of emotional information. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 3–47.
74.
ZatorreR. J.MeyerE.GjeddeA.EvansA. C. (1996). PET studies of phonetic processing of speech: Review, replication, and reanalysis. Cerebral Cortex, 6, 21–30. doi:10.1093/cercor/6.1.21
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
