The Forensic and Clinical Relevance of Evidence-Based Investigative Interview Methods in Historical Sexual Abuse Cases

Abstract

Decades-old child sexual abuse cases stress the need to examine the accuracy of long-term memory regarding traumatic events. The article by Goldfarb, Goodman, Larson, Eisen, and Qin (published in the March 2019 issue of Clinical Psychological Science) showed that memories of genital contact occurring decades ago were highly accurate. We argue that their findings emphasize the use of investigative interviewing in past abuse cases. Such cognitive interviewing (CI) is known to increase the completeness of memory reports. We also contend that the CI may reduce a victim’s anxiety at the time of the interview. Therefore, besides a well-proven legal relevance, investigative interviewing could also have clinical value.

Keywords

anxiety cognitive interview eyewitness memory therapeutic jurisprudence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brunel

Launay

(2012). Cost and benefit of a new instruction for the cognitive interview: The open depth instruction. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19, 845–863. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2012.684058

Colomb

Ginet

(2012). The cognitive interview used with adults: An empirical test of an alternative mnemonic and of a modified protocol. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 35–47. doi:10.1002/acp.1792

Colomb

Ginet

Wright

Demarchi

Sadler

(2013). Back to the real: Efficacy and perception of a modified cognitive interview in the field. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 574–583. doi:10.1002/acp.2942

Dodier

(2018). The need for memory experts in French courts. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 18, 158–176. doi:10.1080/24732850.2018.1444912

Dodier

Melinder

Otgaar

Payoux

Magnussen

(2019). Psychologists and psychiatrists in court: What do they know about eyewitness memory? A comparison of experts in inquisitorial and adversarial legal systems. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11896-019-09339-0

Dodier

Tomas

(2018). When psychological science fails to be heard: The lack of evidence-based arguments in a ministerial report on child sexual abuse. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13218719.2018.1506716

Eisen

M. L.

Qin

Goodman

G. S.

Davis

S. L.

(2002). Memory and suggestibility in maltreated children: Age, stress arousal, dissociation, and psychopathology. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83, 167–212. doi:10.1016/S0022-0965(02)00126-1

Esterling

B. A.

L’Abate

Murray

E. J.

Pennebaker

J. W.

(1999). Empirical foundations for writing in prevention and psychotherapy: Mental and physical health outcomes. Clinical Psychology Review, 19, 79–96. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(98)00015-4

Fisher

R. P.

Geiselman

R. E.

(1992). Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas Publishers.

10.

Fisher

R. P.

Geiselman

R. E.

(2010). The cognitive interview method of conducting police interviews: Eliciting extensive information and promoting therapeutic jurisprudence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33, 321–328. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.09.004

11.

Fisher

R. P.

Geiselman

R. E.

(2017). Investigative interviewing. In Van Hasselt

V. B.

Bourke

M. L.

(Eds.), Handbook of behavioral criminology (pp. 451–465). New York, NY: Springer Publishing.

12.

Goldfarb

Goodman

G. S.

Larson

R. P.

Eisen

M. L.

Qin

(2019). Long-term memory in adults exposed to childhood violence: Remembering genital contact nearly 20 years later. Clinical Psychological Science, 7, 381–396. doi:10.1177/2167702618805742

13.

Lamb

M. E.

Orbach

Hershkowitz

Esplin

P. W.

Horowitz

(2007). A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: A review of research using the NICHD investigative interview protocol. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 1201–1231. doi:10.1016/j. chiabu.2007.03.021

14.

Langballe

Å.

Schultz

J.-H

. (2017). “I couldn’t tell such things to others”: Trauma-exposed youth and the investigative interview. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 18, 62–74. doi:10.1080/15614263.2016.1229185

15.

Lavis

Brewer

(2017). Effects of a proven error on evaluations of witness testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 41, 314–323. doi:10.1037/lhb0000217

16.

Madsen

Holmberg

(2014). Interviewees’ psychological well-being in investigative interviews: A therapeutic jurisprudential approach. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22, 60–74. doi:10.1080/13218719.2014.918083

17.

Magnussen

Melinder

(2012). What psychologists know and believe about memory: A survey of practitioners. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 54–60. doi:10.1002/acp.1795

18.

Melinder

Magnussen

(2015). Psychologists and psychiatrists serving as expert witnesses in court: What do they know about eyewitness memory? Psychology, Crime and Law, 21, 53–61. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2014.915324

19.

Memon

Meissner

C. A.

Fraser

(2010). The cognitive interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 340–372. doi:10.1037/a0020518

20.

Memon

Zaragoza

Clifford

Kidd

(2010). Inoculation or antidote? The effects of cognitive interview timing on false memory for forcibly fabricated events. Law & Human Behavior, 34, 105–117. doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9172-6

21.

Molinaro

P. F.

Fisher

R. P.

Mosser

A. E.

Satin

G. E.

(2019). Train-the-trainer: Methodology to learn the cognitive interview. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 16, 32–43. doi:10.1002/jip.1518

22.

Murray

E. J.

Segal

D. L.

(1994). Emotional processing in vocal and written expression of feelings about traumatic experiences. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 7, 391–405.

23.

Patihis

L. Y.

Tingen

I. W.

Lilienfeld

S. O.

Loftus

E. F.

(2014). Are the “memory wars” over? A scientist-practitioner gap in beliefs about repressed memory. Psychological Science, 25, 519–530. doi:10.1177/0956797613510718

24.

Paulo

R. M.

Albuquerque

P. B.

Vitorino

Bull

(2017). Enhancing the cognitive interview with and alternative procedure to witness-compatible questioning: Category clustering recall. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23, 967–982.doi:10.1080/1068316X.2017.1351966

25.

Pennebaker

J. W.

(1997). Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science, 8, 162–166. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00403.x

26.

Pennebaker

J. W.

Seagal

J. D.

(1999). Forming a story: The health benefits of narrative. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 1243–1254. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199910)55:10 < 1243::AID-JCLP6 > 3.0.CO;2-N

27.

Schreiber Compo

Hyman Gregory

Fisher

R. P

. (2012). Interviewing behaviors in police investigators: A field study of a current US sample. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18, 359–375. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2010.494604

28.

Shepherd

Mortimer

Turner

Watson

(1999). Spaced cognitive interviewing: Facilitating therapeutic and forensic narration of traumatic memories. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5, 117–143. doi:10.1080/10683169908414997

29.

Shields

G. S.

Sazma

M. A.

McCullough

A. M.

Yonelinas

A. P.

(2017). The effects of acute stress on episodic memory: A meta-analysis and integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 636–675. doi:10.1037/bul0000100

30.

Vallano

J. P.

Schreiber Compo

(2011). A comfortable witness is a good witness: Rapport-building and susceptibility to misinformation in an investigative mock-crime interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 960–970. doi:10.1002/acp.1789

31.

Zech

Rimé

(2005). Is talking about an emotional experience helpful? Effects on emotional recovery and perceived benefits. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 12, 270–287. doi:10.1002/cpp.460