FisherA. J.MedagliaJ. D.JeronimusB. F. (2018). Lack of group-to-individual generalizabilty is a threat to human subjects research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 115(27), E6106–E6115. doi:10.1073/pnas.1711978115
2.
GatesK. M.MolenaarP. C. M. (2012). Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivity maps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples. NeuroImage, 63, 310–319. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.026
3.
HayesS. C.HofmannS. G. (2017). The third wave of CBT and the rise of process-based care. World Psychiatry, 16, 245–246. doi:10.102/wps.20442
4.
HofmannS. G.CurtissJ.McNallyM. J. (2016). A complex network perspective on clinical science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 597–605. doi:10.1177/1745691616639283
5.
HoffmanS. G.HayesS. C. (2019). The future of intervention science: Process-based therapy. Clinical Psychological Science, 7, 37–50. doi:10.1177/2167702618772296
6.
LeungJ. K. H. (2019). A need to specify the nonspecificity of mental disorders and interventions: Response to Hofmann and Hayes [Letter]. Clinical Psychological Science, 7, 187–188. doi:10.1177/2167702618812732
7.
LevinM. E.MacLaneC.DaflosS.SeeleyJ.HayesS. C.BiglanA.PistorelloJ. (2014). Examining psychological inflexibility as a transdiagnostic risk factor for Axis I disorders among first year college students. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 3, 155–163. doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2014.06.003
8.
MolenaarP. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2, 201–218. doi:10.1207/s15366359mea0204_1