For over three decades confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) has been used to test the construct validity of models of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The four symptom dimensions of PTSD in the fifth edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM–5) are based on CFA. Since the publication of DSM–5, the number of proposed factors has grown from four to seven. We review these models, focusing on (a) the number of symptoms per factor, indicating how well factors are identified; (b) correlations between factors, indicating how distinct they are; and (c) their external validation. Of the 27 CFAs published since 2013, almost all included factors composed of only two symptoms, and most relied on more than one. High factor correlations were the norm. Two thirds of models provided external validation. Discussion concerns implications for PTSD’s measurement and construct validity and recommendations for improving CFA in the PTSD literature.
American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
4.
*ArmourC.ContractorA.SheaT.ElhaiJ. D.PietrzakR. H. (2016). Factor structure of the PTSD Checklist for DSM–5: Relationships among symptom clusters, anger, and impulsivity. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 204, 108–115. doi:10.1097/NMD.0000000000000430
5.
ArmourC.MűllerováJ.ElhaiJ. D. (2016). A systematic literature review of PTSD’s latent structure in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM–IV to DSM–5. Clinical Psychology Review, 44, 60–74. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.12.003
6.
ArmourC.TsaiJ.DurhamT. A.CharakR.BiehnT. L.ElhaiJ. D.PietrzakR. H. (2015). Dimensional structure of DSM–5 posttraumatic stress symptoms: Support for a hybrid anhedonia and externalizing behaviors model. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 61, 106–113. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.10.012
7.
BandalosD. L. (2018). Measurement theory and applications for the social sciences. New York, NY: Guilford.
8.
BarlowD. H.AllenL. B.ChoateM. L. (2004). Toward a unified treatment for emotional disorders. Behavior Therapy, 35, 205–230. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80036-4
9.
BartholomewD. J.KnottM.MoustakiI. (2011). Latent variable models and factor analysis: A unified approach (3rd ed.). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley.
10.
BrownT. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.n). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
11.
BrowneM. W.MacCallumR. C.KimC.-T.AndersenB. L.GlaserR. (2002). When fit indices and residuals are incompatible. Psychological Methods, 7, 403–421. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.403
12.
*CarragherN.SunderlandM.BatterhamP. J.CalearA. L.ElhaiJ. D.ChapmanC.MillsK. (2016). Discriminant validity and gender differences in DSM–5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. Journal of Affective Disorders, 190, 56–67. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.071
13.
CaspiA.HoutsR. M.BelskyD. W.Goldman-MellorS. J.HarringtonH.IsraelS.. . . MoffittT. E. (2014). The p factor: One general psychopathology factor in the structure of psychiatric disorders?Clinical Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2, 119–137. doi:10.1177/2167702613497473
14.
ChenC. M.YoonY.-H.HarfordT. C.GrantB. F. (2017). Dimensionality of DSM–5 posttraumatic stress disorder and its association with suicide attempts: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 52, 715–725. doi:10.1007/s00127-017-1374-0
15.
ChenF.CurranP. J.BollenK. A.KirbyJPaxtonP. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in the RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 36, 462–494. doi:10.1177/0049124108314720
16.
*Cyniak-CieciuraM.StaniaszekK.PopielA.PragłowskaE.ZawadzkiB. (2017). The structure of PTSD symptoms according to DSM–5 and IDC-11 proposal: A multi-sample analysis. European Psychiatry, 44, 179–186. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.02.491
17.
DemirchyanA.GoenjianA. K.KhachadourianV. (2015). Factor structure and psychometric properties of the posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Checklist and DSM–5 PTSD symptom set in a long-term postearthquake cohort in Armenia. Assessment, 22, 594–606.
18.
DillonW. R.KumarA.MulaniN. (1987). Offending estimates in covariance structure analysis: Comments on the causes of and solutions to Heywood cases. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 126–135.
19.
*DurhamT. A.ByllesbyB. M.ArmourC.ForbesD.ElhaiJ. D. (2016). Relations between anger and DSM–5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. Psychiatry Research, 244, 403–409. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2016.08.004
20.
ElhaiJ. D.BiehnT. L.ArmourC.KlopperJ. J.FruehB. C.PalmieriP. A. (2011). Evidence for a unique PTSD construct represented by PTSD’s D1–D3 symptoms. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25, 340–345. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.10.007
21.
ElhaiJ. D.ContractorA. A.PalmieriP. A.ForbesD.RichardsonJ. D. (2011). Exploring the relationship between underlying dimensions of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression in a national, trauma-exposed military sample. Journal of Affective Disorders, 133, 477–480.
22.
ElhaiJ. D.PalmieriP. A. (2011). The factor structure of posttraumatic stress disorder: A literature update, critique of methodology, and agenda for future research. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25, 849–854. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.04.007
23.
*ForbesD.LockwoodE.ElhaiJ. D.CreamerM.BryantR.McFarlaneA.. . . O’DonnellM. (2015). An evaluation of the DSM–5 factor structure for posttraumatic stress disorder in survivors of traumatic injury. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 29, 43–51. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.11.004
24.
*FrankfurtS. B.ArmourC.ContractorA. A.ElhaiJ. D. (2016). Do gender and directness of trauma exposure moderate PTSD’s latent structure?Psychiatry Research, 245, 365–370. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2016.08.049
25.
FriedmanM. J.ResickP. A.BryantR. A.BrewinC. R. (2011). Considering PTSD for DSM-5. Depression and Anxiety, 28, 750–769. doi:10.1002/da.20767
26.
Galatzer-LevyI. R.BryantR. A. (2013). 636,120 ways to have posttraumatic stress disorder. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 651–662.
27.
GrosD. F.SimmsL. J.AciernoR. (2010). Specificity of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms: an investigation of comorbidity between posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and depression in treatment-seeking veterans. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 198, 885–890.
28.
*HuntJ. C.ChesneyS. A.JorgensenT. D.SchumannN. R.deRoon-CassiniT. A. (2018). Exploring the gold-standard: Evidence for a two-factor model of the clinician administered PTSD Scale for theDSM–5. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 10, 551–558. doi:10.1037/tra0000310
29.
KaplanD. W. (2008). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
30.
KeaneT. M.CaddellJ. M.TaylorK. L. (1988) Mississippi Scale for Combat-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Three studies in reliability and validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 85–90. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.56.1.85
31.
KingD. W.LeskinG. A.KingL. A.WeathersF. W. (1998). Confirmatory factor analysis of the clinician-administered PTSD Scale: Evidence for the dimensionality of posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological Assessment, 10, 90–96. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.90
32.
KlineR. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
33.
*KoneckyB.MeyerE. C.KimbrelN. A.MorissetteS. B. (2016). The structure of DSM–5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in war veterans. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 29, 497–506. doi:10.1080/10615806.2015.1081178
34.
KuhnT. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35.
LachenbruchP. A. (1988). Multiple reading procedures: the performance of diagnostic tests. Statistics in Medicine, 7, 549–557. doi:10.1002/sim.4780070502
36.
LykkenD. T. (1971). Multiple factor analysis and personality research. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 5, 161–170.
37.
*LiuL.WangL.CaoC.QingY.ArmourC. (2016). Testing the dimensional structure of DSM–5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in a nonclinical trauma-exposed adolescent sample. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57, 204–212. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12462
38.
MacCallumR. C.BrowneM. W.SugawaraH. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149.
*MacLeodM. A.GeorgeJ.TremblayP. F.Elton-MarshallT.DeWitD.GrahamK.WellsS. (2017). Dimensionality of the PTSD Checklist in a Canadian aboriginal sample. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 25, 4–21. doi:10.1891/1061-3749.25.1.4
41.
MarshH. W.HauK.-T.BallaJ. R.GraysonD. (1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 181–220. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3302_1
42.
MarshH. W.LüdtkeO.MuthénB.AsparouhovT.MorinA. J.TrautweinU.NagengastB. (2010). A new look at the Big Five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471–491. doi:10.1037/a0019227
McDonaldR. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
45.
McDonaldR. P. (2004). Respecifying improper structures. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11, 194–209. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1102_3
46.
McDonaldR. P. (2010). Structural models and the art of approximation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 675–686. doi:10.1177/1745691610388766
47.
*MordenoI. G.GoG. P.Yangson-SerondoA. (2017). Examining the dimensional structure models of secondary traumatic stress based on DSM–5 symptoms. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 25, 154–160. doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2016.10.024
48.
*MordenoI. G.NalipayM. J. N.SyD. J. S.LuzanoJ. G. C. (2016). PTSD factor structure and relationship with self-construal among internally displaced persons. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 44, 102–110. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.10.013
49.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 599–620. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_8
50.
NorrisF. H.PerillaJ. L. (1996). The Revised Civilian Mississippi Scale for PTSD: Reliability, validity, and cross-language stability. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9, 285–298. doi:10.1007/BF02110661
51.
OlbertC. M.GalaG. J.TuplerL. A. (2014). Quantifying heterogeneity attributable to polythetic diagnostic criteria: Theoretical framework and empirical application. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 123, 452–462. doi:10.1037/a0036068
52.
OsmanA.DownsW. R.BarriosF. X.KopperB. A.GutierrezP. M.ChirosC. E. (1997). Factor structure and psychometric characteristics of the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 19, 359–376. doi:10.1007/BF02229026
53.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
54.
RasmussenA.SmithH.KellerA. S. (2007). Factor structure of PTSD symptoms among west and central African refugees. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 20, 271–280. doi:10.1002/jts.20208
55.
RasmussenA.VerkuilenJ.HoE.FanY. (2015). Posttraumatic stress disorder among refugees: Measurement invariance of Harvard Trauma Questionnaire scores across global regions and response patterns. Psychological Assessment, 27, 1160–1170. doi:10.1037/pas0000115
56.
*SachserC.BerlinerL.HoltT.JensenT.JungbluthN.RischE.. . . GoldbeckL. (2018). Comparing the dimensional structure and diagnostic algorithms between DSM–5 and ICD-11 PTSD in children and adolescents. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27, 181–190. doi:10.1007/s00787-017-1032-9
57.
*SchnyderU.MüllerJ.MorinaN.SchickM.BryantR. A.NickersonA. (2015). A comparison of DSM–5 and DSM–IV diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder in traumatized refugees. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 28, 267–274. doi:10.1002/jts.22023
58.
*ShevlinM.HylandP.KaratziasT.BissonJ. I.RobertsN. P. (2017). Examining the disconnect between psychometric models and clinical reality of posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 47, 54–59. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.02.006
59.
ShiromA.MelamedS. (2006). A comparison of the construct validity of two burnout measures among two groups of professionals. International Journal of Stress Management, 13, 176–200.
60.
SilverS. M.IaconoC. V. (1984). Factor-analytic support for DSM–III’s post-traumatic stress disorder for Vietnam veterans. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 5–14. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198401)40:1<5::AID-JCLP2270400102>3.0.CO;2-N
61.
SimmsL. J.WatsonD.DoebbelingB. N. (2002). Confirmatory factor analyses of posttraumatic stress symptoms in deployed and nondeployed veterans of the Gulf War. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 637–647. doi:10.1037//0021-843X.111.4.637
62.
SkrondalA.Rabe-HeskethS. (2004). Generalized latent variable modeling: Multilevel, longitudinal, and structural equation models. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
63.
*SoberónC.CrespoM.Gómez-GutiérrezM.delM.Fernández-LansacV.ArmourC. (2016). Dimensional structure of DSM–5 posttraumatic stress symptoms in Spanish trauma victims. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 7, Article 32078. doi:10.3402/ejpt.v7.32078
64.
*TayA. K.JayasuriyaR.JayasuriyaD.SiloveD. (2017). Assessing the factorial structure and measurement invariance of PTSD by gender and ethnic groups in Sri Lanka: An analysis of the modified Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (HTQ). Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 47, 45–53. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.02.001
65.
*TayA. K.ReesS.ChenJ.KarethM.SiloveD. (2015). The structure of post-traumatic stress disorder and complex post-traumatic stress disorder amongst West Papuan refugees. BMC Psychiatry, 15, 111. doi:10.1186/s12888-015-0480-3
66.
ThurstoneL. L. (1948). Psychological implications of factor analysis. American Psychologist, 3, 402–408.
67.
TsaiJ.ArmourC.SouthwickS. M.PietrzakR. H. (2015). Dissociative subtype of DSM–5 posttraumatic stress disorder in U.S. veterans. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 66–67, 67–74. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.04.017
68.
*TsaiJ.Harpaz-RotemI.ArmourC.SouthwickS. M.KrystalJ. H.PietrzakR. H. (2015). Dimensional structure of DSM–5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms: Results from the National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 76, 546–553.
69.
Van DamN. T.EarleywineM. (2011). Validation of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale–Revised (CESD-R): Pragmatic depression assessment in the general population. Psychiatry Research, 186, 128–132. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2010.08.018
70.
*WangL.CaoX.CaoC.FangR.YangH.ElhaiJ. D. (2017). Factor structure of DSM–5 PTSD symptoms in trauma-exposed adolescents: Examining stability across time. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 52, 88–94. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.07.001
71.
WardL. C. (2006). Comparison of factor structure models for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Psychological Assessment, 18, 81–88. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.1.81
WeissD. S.MarmarC. R. (1997). The Impact of Event Scale–Revised. In WilsonJ.KeaneT. M. (Eds.), Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD (pp. 399–411). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
74.
WilliamsJ. B. W. (2001). Standardizing the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: Past, present, and future. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 251, 6–12. doi:10.1007/BF03035120
75.
*WortmannJ. H.JordanA. H.WeathersF. W.ResickP. A.DondanvilleK. A.Hall-ClarkB.. . . LitzB. T. (2016). Psychometric analysis of the PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5) among treatment-seeking military service members. Psychological Assessment, 28, 1392–1403. doi:10.1037/pas0000260
76.
XiaY.YangY. (2018). RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods [Advance online publication]. Behavior Research Methods. doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2
77.
YangH.WangL.CaoC.CaoX.FangR.ZhangJ.ElhaiJ. D. (2017). The underlying dimensions of DSM–5 PTSD symptoms and their relations with anxiety and depression in a sample of adolescents exposed to an explosion accident. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 8, 1–7. doi:10.1080/20008198.2016.1272789
78.
*ZhouX.WuX.ZhenR. (2017). Assessing the latent structure of DSM–5 PTSD among Chinese adolescents after the Ya’an earthquake. Psychiatry Research, 254, 33–39. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.04.029
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
